<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Noted liberal pundit: CA &#8216;affirmative consent&#8217; law a &#8216;radical experiment&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:35:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-98018</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-98018</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-98006&quot;&gt;SeeSaw&lt;/a&gt;.

Not everybody is born gay, seesaw. How naive of you. Some people choose that lifestyle for one reason or another. And now with the government intruding into our bedrooms with laws on heterosexual behavior, I am beginning to understand why a young man with a common orientation might decide to turn gay. 
Did you know that the State of California will prosecute an aids patient who knows that he or she is infected with aids and has sex with another person without disclosing his or her condition beforehand ONLY if the State can show the aids infected person ACTED WITH THE INTENT TO INFECT THE OTHER PERSON WITH HIV??? LOL!!!! That burden of proof on the State is incredible. The aids patient can simply claim that he or she had sex with the other person for the gratification of the act or that he/she was sexually aroused by the unknowing partner. But that there was NO INTENT to infect him or her!!!
See the difference in the context of the laws between the heterosexual and homosexual homosexual populations in California, seesaw. Oh, and yes. The LARGE LARGE majority of aids patients in California are gay. It is generally known to be a &#039;gay disease&#039; in the medical community.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-98006">SeeSaw</a>.</p>
<p>Not everybody is born gay, seesaw. How naive of you. Some people choose that lifestyle for one reason or another. And now with the government intruding into our bedrooms with laws on heterosexual behavior, I am beginning to understand why a young man with a common orientation might decide to turn gay.<br />
Did you know that the State of California will prosecute an aids patient who knows that he or she is infected with aids and has sex with another person without disclosing his or her condition beforehand ONLY if the State can show the aids infected person ACTED WITH THE INTENT TO INFECT THE OTHER PERSON WITH HIV??? LOL!!!! That burden of proof on the State is incredible. The aids patient can simply claim that he or she had sex with the other person for the gratification of the act or that he/she was sexually aroused by the unknowing partner. But that there was NO INTENT to infect him or her!!!<br />
See the difference in the context of the laws between the heterosexual and homosexual homosexual populations in California, seesaw. Oh, and yes. The LARGE LARGE majority of aids patients in California are gay. It is generally known to be a &#8216;gay disease&#8217; in the medical community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SeeSaw		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-98006</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeSaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-98006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[LIC thinks that people &quot;turn&quot; Gay--how sad is that!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIC thinks that people &#8220;turn&#8221; Gay&#8211;how sad is that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-98005</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-98005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I feel sorry for all the young men in our society and I detest the hoops that they have to jump through today to obey these assinine laws on sexual behavior enacted by these old men who can&#039;t even sustain erections any longer. It&#039;s sort of like old flaccid men who have never heard a damn shot fired in a military conflict starting wars and sending the young studs off to die in many cases for nothing more than campaign contributions from defense contractors. F them all. 
With all these laws how can any normal person have fun in the bedroom without being turned into a damned criminal? They are destroying whatever human pleasures we had left in this society.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel sorry for all the young men in our society and I detest the hoops that they have to jump through today to obey these assinine laws on sexual behavior enacted by these old men who can&#8217;t even sustain erections any longer. It&#8217;s sort of like old flaccid men who have never heard a damn shot fired in a military conflict starting wars and sending the young studs off to die in many cases for nothing more than campaign contributions from defense contractors. F them all.<br />
With all these laws how can any normal person have fun in the bedroom without being turned into a damned criminal? They are destroying whatever human pleasures we had left in this society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97889</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-97889</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97868&quot;&gt;Ulysses Uhaul&lt;/a&gt;.

&#039;Secular State&#039;? 

You mean like snuffing infants in the womb? Sure, there are strong arguments on both sides of the equation. I know that. But one thing you can&#039;t deny: Life is life and killing is killing. And each of us has to form a personal opinon. Is it right or is it wrong? The &#039;Secular State&#039; is no friend to life in the womb. And we know which political ideology that represents. Don&#039;t we? ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97868">Ulysses Uhaul</a>.</p>
<p>&#8216;Secular State&#8217;? </p>
<p>You mean like snuffing infants in the womb? Sure, there are strong arguments on both sides of the equation. I know that. But one thing you can&#8217;t deny: Life is life and killing is killing. And each of us has to form a personal opinon. Is it right or is it wrong? The &#8216;Secular State&#8217; is no friend to life in the womb. And we know which political ideology that represents. Don&#8217;t we? 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ulysses Uhaul		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97868</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulysses Uhaul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 07:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-97868</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Morality is not in vogue.......no law is needed but The Ten Commandments! Have we loved &quot;The Secular State&quot; too much?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morality is not in vogue&#8230;&#8230;.no law is needed but The Ten Commandments! Have we loved &#8220;The Secular State&#8221; too much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Reed		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97864</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 05:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-97864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97833&quot;&gt;Ulysses Uhaul&lt;/a&gt;.

Ulysses, your moral preening is obnoxious. This new law has conservative admirers and critics, and liberal admirers and critics. It has prompted impassioned debate on legal blogs. It is a worthy topic. It&#039;s getting lots and lots of news coverage.

But you just come along and dismiss it all. Jon Chait? Cathy Young? The obvious concern raised by having one legal standard for one group and another for a minority? 

They&#039;re all &quot;crap.&quot;

LOL! Thanks for the chuckle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97833">Ulysses Uhaul</a>.</p>
<p>Ulysses, your moral preening is obnoxious. This new law has conservative admirers and critics, and liberal admirers and critics. It has prompted impassioned debate on legal blogs. It is a worthy topic. It&#8217;s getting lots and lots of news coverage.</p>
<p>But you just come along and dismiss it all. Jon Chait? Cathy Young? The obvious concern raised by having one legal standard for one group and another for a minority? </p>
<p>They&#8217;re all &#8220;crap.&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL! Thanks for the chuckle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David M. Hodges		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97858</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David M. Hodges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-97858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97857&quot;&gt;David M. Hodges&lt;/a&gt;.

Actually, I should say I expressed my own doubts about the law at that time. I&#039;m not sure they&#039;re at all &quot;similar&quot; to those offered here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97857">David M. Hodges</a>.</p>
<p>Actually, I should say I expressed my own doubts about the law at that time. I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;re at all &#8220;similar&#8221; to those offered here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David M. Hodges		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97857</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David M. Hodges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-97857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had some similar thoughts on the law back when the legislators passed it (29 August 2014): http://piouseye.com/eyesite/2014/08/consent-only-repeated-yeses-will-do-say-state-lawmakers/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had some similar thoughts on the law back when the legislators passed it (29 August 2014): <a href="http://piouseye.com/eyesite/2014/08/consent-only-repeated-yeses-will-do-say-state-lawmakers/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://piouseye.com/eyesite/2014/08/consent-only-repeated-yeses-will-do-say-state-lawmakers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ulysses Uhaul		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulysses Uhaul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-97833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[this is a crap article not worthy of comment.....

Move on.......we don&#039;t need puff comments from chubby old men!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a crap article not worthy of comment&#8230;..</p>
<p>Move on&#8230;&#8230;.we don&#8217;t need puff comments from chubby old men!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/noted-liberal-pundit-ca-affirmative-consent-law-a-radical-experiment/#comment-97809</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68950#comment-97809</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So here&#039;s my guess as to what will happen over the next couple of years... This new law goes into effect and we find that college men are still getting accused of rape if the woman changes her mind after they have sex. So men begin to video tape the consent to provide more proof of their lack of coercion when having sex. 

So, since these videos are probably being taken via a smart phone, Google, Facebook, as well as the feds now are accessing these records. Soon, these videos go viral and women get pissed. The law is reminded and sex returns to the bedroom and away from government interference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here&#8217;s my guess as to what will happen over the next couple of years&#8230; This new law goes into effect and we find that college men are still getting accused of rape if the woman changes her mind after they have sex. So men begin to video tape the consent to provide more proof of their lack of coercion when having sex. </p>
<p>So, since these videos are probably being taken via a smart phone, Google, Facebook, as well as the feds now are accessing these records. Soon, these videos go viral and women get pissed. The law is reminded and sex returns to the bedroom and away from government interference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-11 07:44:05 by W3 Total Cache
-->