Comments on: Google takes lead on California driverless cars https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/ Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:23:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: Standing Fast https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-129154 Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:23:35 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-129154 In reply to G In Law.

Yes, I’ve read about the airborne version of driverless cars. And people actually think that is going to work–I mean, as a safe and sane form of personal transportation? What happens when the contraption malfunctions? Or there is a collision of two or more of them? And what about whoever is on the ground beneath the accident? How dumb do you have to be to think these things up?

]]> By: G In Law https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-129153 Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:14:57 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-129153 This is just the steppingstone to flying transportation. Driverless automobiles need to happen first, then we start traveling in the air.

]]> By: Standing Fast https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-129145 Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:30:45 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-129145 In reply to Queeg.

Beam me up, Scottie!

]]> By: Standing Fast https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-129143 Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:29:13 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-129143 In reply to ricky65.

Exactly. I think the manufacturer of the driverless vehicle should pay. After all, wouldn’t this have to be classified as a vehicle malfunction? Everyone already knows that red-light cameras never make mistakes.

]]> By: Queeg https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-129138 Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:36:17 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-129138 Comrades

Tech trinket makers , corporate food barons and Globalist slavers not ya friend.

Anything that breathes or moves will be taxed by Plutocrats and the Publicans.

The masses will come for the elites first!
That’s all you need to know on CWD.

]]> By: ricky65 https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-129036 Sun, 19 Feb 2017 17:34:35 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-129036 Just wondering: When a driverless car car runs a red light and is photographed by a driverless red light camera cop, who pays for the ticket?

]]> By: Standing Fast https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-128945 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:26:51 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-128945 In reply to ricky65.

Ricky:
Thank you for making my point for me. If rudderless and heartless aren’t working for us, why would driverless?

]]> By: Standing Fast https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-128847 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 01:30:12 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-128847 In reply to ricky65.

Drones? Don’t get me started.

]]> By: Spurwing Plover https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-128680 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:54:18 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-128680 A driverless car that takes moonbeam and newsom to the nearists prison and leaves them there in fact theres a episode of the classic series THE TWILIGHT ZONE about a man involved ina hit and run accident but his car wont allow him to escape his crime

]]> By: ricky65 https://calwatchdog.com/2017/02/15/google-takes-lead-california-driverless-cars/#comment-128585 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:55:06 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92995#comment-128585 Why not driver-less cars?
We already have a rudderless state government running with a heartless drone at the helm.

]]>