<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Charter critics have potent new tool to block approvals, renewals	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2023 20:34:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: baby dogecoin ราคา		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/#comment-150980</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[baby dogecoin ราคา]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2023 20:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=98268#comment-150980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reading your article has greatly helped me, and I agree with you. But I still have some questions. Can you help me? I will pay attention to your answer. thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading your article has greatly helped me, and I agree with you. But I still have some questions. Can you help me? I will pay attention to your answer. thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward Ryan		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/#comment-149679</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2019 02:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=98268#comment-149679</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Edward Ryan
Edward Ryan8 November, 2019, 12:26
I’d like to comment on corruption by the California Attorney General’s failure to investigate a formal 75 page complaint on the LAPD Crime-buster Vigilante Facebook scandal matter. This is a serious matter as the Los Angeles criminal justice system skews when it comes to fair justice for all as LA homeless are attacked by LAPD supported vigilantes, then arrested and jailed if the try to fight back in self- defense. Now there is proof of “jury trial rigging “by LA Prosecutor and LAPD Slo for Topanga. Both are members of the secret vigilante Facebook group, and 2 other Vigilante group members as witnesses for a bogus littering trial where Van Nuys Judge Harmond seems to play along by issuing an extreme sentence. LAPD command now spreads disinformation saying LAPD members only posted insults to homeless when the truth is LAPD supplied tracking and other info to vigilante members. The info was used to do violent crimes and community terror stalking onto targeted homeless victims. A homeless advocate and activist for LA political reform was harassed then convicted and incarcerated for months when he was attacked on 12/29/16 in Van Nuys by the same LAPD crew. False police reports were used and judge Mulcahy Van Nuys court prevented the mentioning of vigilante abuse at trial. This happened to Ed Ryan edryan221@gmail.com who had to flee LA after release because of more vigilante harassment by LAPD connected crews. Ryan’s jaw was smashed by a vigilante attacker wielding a hammer and LAPD refuse to take his complaint and investigate. Ryan now lives in Mass as LA Court court issued a probation violation warrant to further silence him. LA superior Court Presiding Judge, Kevin Brazile has so far ignored Ryan’s comprehensive complaint. Ryan challenges reporters to read the 8/1/18 complaint to Atty Gen Becerra that has plenty of screen shots of captured vigilante and LAPD postings to surely warrant the Cal AG to investigate, but he remains silent on the issue. Also remaining totally silent on this atre LA Mayor Garcetti I’d like to discuss Corruption in Los Angeles as the LAPD Crime-buster vigilante Scandal is being ignored and all LA city Councilors. LA City Atty Furey also is silent even though his long time Deputy Karin Philips is involved and is being reported to Cal BBO flor ethical violations of not disclosing vigilante group membership by entire prosecution team in People v Kevin Perelman , the van Nuys Superior Court jury trial in front of LA Superior Court Harmond that was rigged Atty Philips and LAPD SLO Dines]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward Ryan<br />
Edward Ryan8 November, 2019, 12:26<br />
I’d like to comment on corruption by the California Attorney General’s failure to investigate a formal 75 page complaint on the LAPD Crime-buster Vigilante Facebook scandal matter. This is a serious matter as the Los Angeles criminal justice system skews when it comes to fair justice for all as LA homeless are attacked by LAPD supported vigilantes, then arrested and jailed if the try to fight back in self- defense. Now there is proof of “jury trial rigging “by LA Prosecutor and LAPD Slo for Topanga. Both are members of the secret vigilante Facebook group, and 2 other Vigilante group members as witnesses for a bogus littering trial where Van Nuys Judge Harmond seems to play along by issuing an extreme sentence. LAPD command now spreads disinformation saying LAPD members only posted insults to homeless when the truth is LAPD supplied tracking and other info to vigilante members. The info was used to do violent crimes and community terror stalking onto targeted homeless victims. A homeless advocate and activist for LA political reform was harassed then convicted and incarcerated for months when he was attacked on 12/29/16 in Van Nuys by the same LAPD crew. False police reports were used and judge Mulcahy Van Nuys court prevented the mentioning of vigilante abuse at trial. This happened to Ed Ryan <a href="mailto:edryan221@gmail.com">edryan221@gmail.com</a> who had to flee LA after release because of more vigilante harassment by LAPD connected crews. Ryan’s jaw was smashed by a vigilante attacker wielding a hammer and LAPD refuse to take his complaint and investigate. Ryan now lives in Mass as LA Court court issued a probation violation warrant to further silence him. LA superior Court Presiding Judge, Kevin Brazile has so far ignored Ryan’s comprehensive complaint. Ryan challenges reporters to read the 8/1/18 complaint to Atty Gen Becerra that has plenty of screen shots of captured vigilante and LAPD postings to surely warrant the Cal AG to investigate, but he remains silent on the issue. Also remaining totally silent on this atre LA Mayor Garcetti I’d like to discuss Corruption in Los Angeles as the LAPD Crime-buster vigilante Scandal is being ignored and all LA city Councilors. LA City Atty Furey also is silent even though his long time Deputy Karin Philips is involved and is being reported to Cal BBO flor ethical violations of not disclosing vigilante group membership by entire prosecution team in People v Kevin Perelman , the van Nuys Superior Court jury trial in front of LA Superior Court Harmond that was rigged Atty Philips and LAPD SLO Dines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Standing Fast		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/#comment-149611</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Standing Fast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 23:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=98268#comment-149611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are defending land use policy that favors developers over ordinary people, homeowners and renters who are a city&#039;s greatest asset.  The government program that paved the way for the anti-NIMBY movement promotes public funding and eminent domain abuse for private projects.  That is not constitutional, but it is a federally-sanctioned law under the authority of HUD.  It is NOT good for business.  Our local government officials like it because it gives them great powers to control land use in their jurisdictions.  It is about jobs for the boys, granting favors to rich and powerful people who contribute to political campaigns, and so forth.  You are not in favor of true Liberty if you think people who don&#039;t want giant development projects in their neighborhoods are selfish. It is the politicians, developers, and real estate investors who are selfish.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are defending land use policy that favors developers over ordinary people, homeowners and renters who are a city&#8217;s greatest asset.  The government program that paved the way for the anti-NIMBY movement promotes public funding and eminent domain abuse for private projects.  That is not constitutional, but it is a federally-sanctioned law under the authority of HUD.  It is NOT good for business.  Our local government officials like it because it gives them great powers to control land use in their jurisdictions.  It is about jobs for the boys, granting favors to rich and powerful people who contribute to political campaigns, and so forth.  You are not in favor of true Liberty if you think people who don&#8217;t want giant development projects in their neighborhoods are selfish. It is the politicians, developers, and real estate investors who are selfish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/#comment-149610</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=98268#comment-149610</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Think about that &quot;rejection on financial grounds&quot; means for charters.  Fundamentally it means that with higher overhead, administrative bloat and a greater and greater proportion of funds diverted to retirement funds, school districts can use it to shut down their more efficient and effective competition.  

By the way this is nothing new.  Remember when the ACA created the smaller more nimble insurance companies that were supposed to save people money on insurance premiums?  In our state, some did and actually succeeded in reducing consumer costs while being profitable.  But the clever folks who wrote the law (the legacy health insurance carriers like Blue Cross - Blue Shield) put in a poison pill which said that if other insurers had losses, the profitable ones could be assessed because they were assumed to skim off a healthier portion of the population. The amount of money assessed turned out to be 2x their total profit.  They quickly went out of business.  

Nobody makes perverse incentives quite like the government.  There is a reason healthcare and education costs twice as much as anywhere else in the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about that &#8220;rejection on financial grounds&#8221; means for charters.  Fundamentally it means that with higher overhead, administrative bloat and a greater and greater proportion of funds diverted to retirement funds, school districts can use it to shut down their more efficient and effective competition.  </p>
<p>By the way this is nothing new.  Remember when the ACA created the smaller more nimble insurance companies that were supposed to save people money on insurance premiums?  In our state, some did and actually succeeded in reducing consumer costs while being profitable.  But the clever folks who wrote the law (the legacy health insurance carriers like Blue Cross &#8211; Blue Shield) put in a poison pill which said that if other insurers had losses, the profitable ones could be assessed because they were assumed to skim off a healthier portion of the population. The amount of money assessed turned out to be 2x their total profit.  They quickly went out of business.  </p>
<p>Nobody makes perverse incentives quite like the government.  There is a reason healthcare and education costs twice as much as anywhere else in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dc1		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/#comment-149609</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dc1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=98268#comment-149609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/#comment-149608&quot;&gt;deweaver&lt;/a&gt;.

Nothing like having a monopoly, and controlling the state government as well. It&#039;s a good gig...they donate money to get their friendlies elected, then they get to &#039;negotiate&#039; with them for all sorts of goodies and benefits. The only losers are taxpayers and students....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/#comment-149608">deweaver</a>.</p>
<p>Nothing like having a monopoly, and controlling the state government as well. It&#8217;s a good gig&#8230;they donate money to get their friendlies elected, then they get to &#8216;negotiate&#8217; with them for all sorts of goodies and benefits. The only losers are taxpayers and students&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: deweaver		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/#comment-149608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deweaver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=98268#comment-149608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile the quality of the education continues downward.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile the quality of the education continues downward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dc1		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/10/15/charter-critics-have-potent-new-tool-to-block-approvals-renewals/#comment-149607</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dc1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=98268#comment-149607</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If the teachers union is in support it clearly will be good for them, but bad for students and likely bad for taxpayers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the teachers union is in support it clearly will be good for them, but bad for students and likely bad for taxpayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-05-03 09:50:02 by W3 Total Cache
-->