NASA Exposed Global Warming Hoax

July 28, 2011 - By Katy Grimes

Just as NASA was gaining some steam on blowing the cover off of the global warming hoax using real science, President Barrack Obama threw a monkey wrench into the space program.

A new study published by the science journal Remote Sensing highlights NASA satellite data which shows that the atmosphere has been shedding heat long before United Nations computer models predicted. And the study indicates that far less future global warming will occur than global warming zealots have claimed.

In Forbes’ analysis “New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism,” author James Taylor shows that the study really does blow a gaping hole in alarmists’ theories, and it should blow a hole in the massive government subsidies being shelled out as well.

“When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a ‘huge discrepancy’ between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are,” wrote Taylor.

But NASA’s demise seems certain with President Obama’s recent announcement of a “refocusing” of NASA’s budget on global warming and other political agendas instead of pursuing manned space flight. The refocus of NASA funding couldn’t be more brutal, with NASA science debunking the global warming agenda.

Opponents of NASA have been horrific hypocrites recently, touting the benefits of “privatized” space flight, in order to justify ending NASA’s manned space capabilities. “Of all the other federal functions ripe for privatization — the dinosaur postal service for example — Obama targets the one function that provides both national security benefits and requires massive accumulation of capital to conduct. Too bad Obama’s zeal to wipe out manned space flight through privatization doesn’t extend to other parts of the federal government,” J. Christian Adams of Pajamas Media so aptly points out in Obama Pulls the Plug on a Great Run in Space.

Why not privatize Amtrack instead? Amtrack is a colossal waste of taxpayer funding with even less reliability than the postal service.

Or end the very expensive push to expand government health care, which will only compete with the country’s private health care – still one of the best health care systems in the world.

Solar and wind subsidies have also exponentially increased since 2008, despite the unreliability of both as a primary source of alternative energy. This is one area of government where mountains of money could be saved as well as encouraging private market solar and wind solutions.

But that does not fit the liberal agenda of government expansion and takeover.

It’s difficult not to see a conspiracy with NASA’s demise; space has measurable benefits including military benefits. But China, Russia and even India will be directing space travel now, and probably end up cutting off America’s needed military access to space.

The Obama administration’s NASA decision will have long-term ramifications including but not limited to America’s military.

One comment left on Adams’ story resonated particularly: “Obama shares the common progressive hostility to actual science… Real science, especially space science, has a terrible potential to discover things that progressives cannot deny, or co-opt for their grand plans. Imagine what would happen to their plans for an “energy limited” Utopia with solar power satellites pumping out a few terawatts of power each day, as opposed to their preferred “appropriate technology” surface receptors, which have a couple of small problems- called “night” and “the atmosphere.”

NASA’s massive budget has been largely unaccountable for decades – this many agree upon. And Democrats have resented the money spent on space travel and instead have always prefered spending on social programs. And now, the President is going to give them the money and put thousands of NASA employees out of work. So much for the “jobs, jobs, jobs” which use real science.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  1. Jeff says:

    What a joke this article is.

  2. Joe says:

    Hey, Jeff. Just WHY is it a joke? Give your reasons, backed by citations, and, unlike the anthropocentric warmers, give both sides of the argument so we can judge for ourselves.

  3. John says:

    So Global Warming is FAKE?

  4. Fedupwithmorons says:


  5. Marty says:

    Fake? The globe warms and cools on a historic 1,500 year cycle. Of course we only have 4,500 years of documented history to go on. Man made global warming? With a span of about 8 degrees man may contribute an additional .05 degree to that. We won’t burn and become hell that’s for sure. And NOT worth trillions of dollars in expense. So much more to say, read the science for your selves not the politics.

  6. melbrookes says:

    global warming hoax is required for globalists to run the world. and just who are these arrogant elitists who think “they”” can run the entire world?

    I think I know the name of one…..

  7. janecobb says:

    I’m just glad this hot debate is over with, I mean, why focus on global warming when we could be working on economy or end world hunger?

  8. Ben says:

    Since this story has been debunked several times and the editor of Remote Sensing resigned over it and apologized for its publication, shouldn’t this be taken down?

  9. CalWatchdog says:

    Ben: We’re not in the habit of placing our articles of this type down the “memory hole,” but will provide corrections or retractions if necessary. That the editor resigned might be because he suffered political pressure from the global-warming establishment. As the Climategate emails have shown, that establishment is very powerful politically. If you wish, please provide a refutation of the evidence in the original article on which Katy Grimes based her story. I’ll put it up here as a comment. We welcome debate.

    — John Seiler, managing editor.

  10. Brian says:

    Excellent Article ! I too have been researching this subject and what I have found is alarming to say the least. Many folks have no idea where this myth is going to lead us. Just do a little research on Agenda 21 and one can see clearly that they ( the US government )are hell bent on taking private property from citizens,through regulations and new laws. what is the most alarming is that most of these new regulations & laws originate from agencies outside of the US. They are already taking and rezoning privately held wetlands throughout the US.

    Much of my personal research has lead me to the conclusion that the US has been working behind citizens backs, with the European Union in one big land-grab. Even the European Union has a manual for American citizens that states ” The USA is encouraged to join the European Union, but must understand they need to give up some of their sovereignty to become a member.” They want YOUR land for the Queen!
    Her financial adviser is pushing for a “World Currency & his new weather graphics website ” They really want your GPS coordinates and address!

    Another interesting point is that the last countries seeking admission to the EU are Romania & Turkey. Whats my point? Well, go to the European Unions website and look at the map,check out what countries are attached to the base of Turkey, Iran, Iraq & Syria. Is all this turmoil and war an accident, or due to the expansionist policy’s of the EU? They already have written of their plan, most Americans probably never even read it. Here is some of their ideas on how they will use YOUR PROPERTY ,please take the time to read it.

  11. Brian says:

    PS: Here is a link to the man who stands to gain the most perpetuating this Global warming scheme.

  12. James says:

    what’s the matter you pathetic scaretactic alarmists, your global warming hoax has been exposed more than this, especially with wiki leaks, proving thousands of emails with scientists faking data to fit their fictional facts on global warming, so please……… meanwhile I’m driving my big 8 cylinder high performance SUV with extreme pleasure!!

  13. […] What happens when the facts are the same, but the interpretation is different? Global Warming a Hoax? […]

  14. dumb says:

    im sick of US policies , you americans need to wake up.

  15. Bill says:

    As with politics, military ect……. In truth, we only and will always ONLY know what we are allowed to know…. I do not rely on what NASA says just because they are NASA.. Of course they are gonna say what they have to to keep their jobs.

    I will continue to listen to the Earth, our progressive weather and the ever changing quality of our air..
    It does NOT require a Rocket Scientist to figure out that we are only hurting ourselves and the future of next generations.
    Even if it were not so,, I am not really that interested in continuing to make the Arab Nations wealthy from my sweat… Myself, I will continue to give my money to American companies,,,,

  16. tj says:

    its the illuminati

  17. GL says:

    Dear Global Warming Sheeps, I have some shares in lets say Solyndra would you like to buy them?

  18. The Truth says:

    We haven’t been around long enough with this Magnatude of pollution , to say that global warming isnt real. Research that, why are the caps melting? Why is hotter every year longer? It’s The Middle Of Noveember and it’s 20 degrees warmer then it was 10 years ago .. So that 8 degrees and .05 degrees is BS!! Explain That!?
    so someone who believes that global warming is fake… Please!… Enlighten me? TY

  19. Harold Faulkner says:


    People in the USA, are being told by the U.S. government and media that global warming is man-made. If that is true, how can the government and media explain the high temperatures the earth has experienced in past years when there were far fewer people? Let us look back in the world’s history: for example, between roughly 900AD and 1350AD the temperatures were much higher than now. And, back then there were fewer people, no cars, no electric utilities, and no factories, etc. So what caused the earth’s heat? Could it be a natural occurrence? The temperature graph at the bottom of this article shows the temperatures of the earth before Christ to 2040.

    In the book THE DISCOVERERS published in February 1985 by Daniel J. Boorstin, beginning in chapter 28, it goes into detail about Eric the Red, the father of Lief Ericsson, and how he discovered an island covered in green grass.

    In approximately 983AD, Eric the Red committed murder, and was banished from Iceland for three years. Eric the Red sailed 500 miles west from Iceland and discovered an island covered in GREEN grass, which he named Greenland. Greenland reminded Eric the Red of his native Norway because of the grass, game animals, and a sea full of fish. Even the air provided a harvest of birds. Eric the Red and his crew started laying out sites for farms and homesteads, as there was no sign of earlier human habitation.

    When his banishment expired, Eric the Red returned to congested Iceland to gather Viking settlers. In 986, Eric the Red set sail with an emigrant fleet of twenty-five ships carrying men, women, and domestic animals. Unfortunately, only fourteen ships survived the stormy passage, which carried about four-hundred-fifty immigrants plus the farm animals. The immigrants settled on the southern-west tip and up the western coast of Greenland.

    After the year 1200AD, the Earth’s and Greenland’s climate grew colder; ice started building up on the southern tip of Greenland. Before the end of 1300AD, the Viking settlements were just a memory. You can find the above by searching Google. One link is:

    The following quote you can also read about why there is global warming. This is from the book EINSTEIN’S UNIVERSE, Page 63, written by Nigel Calder in 1972, and updated in 1982.

    “The reckoning of planetary motions is a venerable science. Nowadays it tells us, for example, how gravity causes the ice to advance or retreat on the Earth during the ice ages. The gravity of the Moon and (to a lesser extent) of the Sun makes the Earth’s axis swivel around like a tilted spinning top. Other planets of the Solar System, especially Jupiter, Mars and Venus, influence the Earth’s tilt and the shape of its orbit, in a more-or-less cyclic fashion, with significant effects on the intensity of sunshine falling on different regions of the Earth during the various seasons. Every so often a fortunate attitude and orbit of the Earth combine to drench the ice sheets in sunshine as at the end of the most recent ice age, about ten thousand years ago. But now our relatively benign interglacial is coming to an end, as gravity continues to toy with our planet.”

    The above points out that the universe is too huge and the earth is too small for the earth’s population to have any effect on the earth’s temperature. The earth’s temperature is a function of the sun’s temperature and the effects from the many massive planets in the universe, i.e., “The gravity of the Moon and (to a lesser extent) of the Sun makes the Earth’s axis swivel around like a tilted spinning top. Other planets of the Solar System, especially Jupiter, Mars and Venus, influence the Earth’s tilt and the shape of its orbit, in a more-or-less cyclic fashion, with significant effects on the intensity of sunshine falling on different regions of the Earth during the various seasons.”

    Read below about carbon dioxide, which we need in order to exist. You can find the article below at:

    Of the 186 billion tons of carbon from CO2 that enter earth’s atmosphere each year from all sources, only 6 billion tons are from human activity. Approximately 90 billion tons come from biologic activity in earth’s oceans and another 90 billion tons from such sources as volcanoes and decaying land plants.

    At 380 parts per million CO2 is a minor constituent of earth’s atmosphere–less than 4/100ths of 1% of all gases present. Compared to former geologic times, earth’s current atmosphere is CO2- impoverished.

    CO2 is odorless, colorless, and tasteless. Plants absorb CO2 and emit oxygen as a waste product. Humans and animals breathe oxygen and emit CO2 as a waste product. Carbon dioxide is a nutrient, not a pollutant, and all life– plants and animals alike– benefit from more of it. All life on earth is carbon-based and CO2 is an essential ingredient. When plant-growers want to stimulate plant growth, they introduce more carbon dioxide.

    CO2 that goes into the atmosphere does not stay there, but continuously recycled by terrestrial plant life and earth’s oceans– the great retirement home for most terrestrial carbon dioxide.

    If we are in a global warming crisis today, even the most aggressive and costly proposals for limiting industrial carbon dioxide emissions and all other government proposals and taxes would have a negligible effect on global climate!

    The government is lying, trying to use global warming to limit, and tax its citizens through “cap and trade” and other tax schemes for the government’s benefit. We, the people cannot allow this to happen.

    The Earth’s Temperature Graph should be shown below:

    If the Earth’s temperature graph is not shown above, you can see this temperature graph at the link:

    You can copy the temperature graph and place it in your computer.

  20. Lamar says:

    Global Warming should be outlawed

  21. Grey says:

    When people claim consensus it’s not science it’s a religion, When people demonize skeptics, it’s not science, it’s religion. Without skeptics science could not exist.

Archive By Categories
  • California economy
  • Corruption
  • Demographics
  • Education
  • Fracking
  • Health Care
  • Income inequality
  • Infrastructure
  • Inside Government
  • Law enforcement
  • Media
  • Obamacare
  • Obamacare implementation
  • Pension Reform
  • Politics and Elections
  • Regulations
  • Rights and Liberties
  • Seen at the Capitol
  • Taxes
  • Technology
  • Thought police
  • Thoughtcrime
  • Waste, Fraud and Abuse