NASA Exposed Global Warming Hoax

Just as NASA was gaining some steam on blowing the cover off of the global warming hoax using real science, President Barrack Obama threw a monkey wrench into the space program.

A new study published by the science journal Remote Sensing highlights NASA satellite data which shows that the atmosphere has been shedding heat long before United Nations computer models predicted. And the study indicates that far less future global warming will occur than global warming zealots have claimed.

In Forbes’ analysis “New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism,” author James Taylor shows that the study really does blow a gaping hole in alarmists’ theories, and it should blow a hole in the massive government subsidies being shelled out as well.

“When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a ‘huge discrepancy’ between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are,” wrote Taylor.

But NASA’s demise seems certain with President Obama’s recent announcement of a “refocusing” of NASA’s budget on global warming and other political agendas instead of pursuing manned space flight. The refocus of NASA funding couldn’t be more brutal, with NASA science debunking the global warming agenda.

Opponents of NASA have been horrific hypocrites recently, touting the benefits of “privatized” space flight, in order to justify ending NASA’s manned space capabilities. “Of all the other federal functions ripe for privatization — the dinosaur postal service for example — Obama targets the one function that provides both national security benefits and requires massive accumulation of capital to conduct. Too bad Obama’s zeal to wipe out manned space flight through privatization doesn’t extend to other parts of the federal government,” J. Christian Adams of Pajamas Media so aptly points out in Obama Pulls the Plug on a Great Run in Space.

Why not privatize Amtrack instead? Amtrack is a colossal waste of taxpayer funding with even less reliability than the postal service.

Or end the very expensive push to expand government health care, which will only compete with the country’s private health care – still one of the best health care systems in the world.

Solar and wind subsidies have also exponentially increased since 2008, despite the unreliability of both as a primary source of alternative energy. This is one area of government where mountains of money could be saved as well as encouraging private market solar and wind solutions.

But that does not fit the liberal agenda of government expansion and takeover.

It’s difficult not to see a conspiracy with NASA’s demise; space has measurable benefits including military benefits. But China, Russia and even India will be directing space travel now, and probably end up cutting off America’s needed military access to space.

The Obama administration’s NASA decision will have long-term ramifications including but not limited to America’s military.

One comment left on Adams’ story resonated particularly: “Obama shares the common progressive hostility to actual science… Real science, especially space science, has a terrible potential to discover things that progressives cannot deny, or co-opt for their grand plans. Imagine what would happen to their plans for an “energy limited” Utopia with solar power satellites pumping out a few terawatts of power each day, as opposed to their preferred “appropriate technology” surface receptors, which have a couple of small problems- called “night” and “the atmosphere.”

NASA’s massive budget has been largely unaccountable for decades – this many agree upon. And Democrats have resented the money spent on space travel and instead have always prefered spending on social programs. And now, the President is going to give them the money and put thousands of NASA employees out of work. So much for the “jobs, jobs, jobs” which use real science.



Write a comment
  1. Jeff
    Jeff 28 July, 2011, 17:48

    What a joke this article is.

    Reply this comment
    • DDofAL
      DDofAL 16 March, 2017, 06:25


      Reply this comment
  2. Joe
    Joe 29 July, 2011, 09:46

    Hey, Jeff. Just WHY is it a joke? Give your reasons, backed by citations, and, unlike the anthropocentric warmers, give both sides of the argument so we can judge for ourselves.

    Reply this comment
  3. John
    John 4 August, 2011, 15:49

    So Global Warming is FAKE?

    Reply this comment
  4. Fedupwithmorons
    Fedupwithmorons 8 August, 2011, 13:34


    Reply this comment
  5. Marty
    Marty 22 August, 2011, 06:49

    Fake? The globe warms and cools on a historic 1,500 year cycle. Of course we only have 4,500 years of documented history to go on. Man made global warming? With a span of about 8 degrees man may contribute an additional .05 degree to that. We won’t burn and become hell that’s for sure. And NOT worth trillions of dollars in expense. So much more to say, read the science for your selves not the politics.

    Reply this comment
    • John Mcgoo
      John Mcgoo 3 March, 2015, 01:03

      Marty I agree: If someone from Hollywood would write a scifi script saying that a trace gas was going to destroy Planet Earth we would all be laughing. The problem is that most people cannot grasp the scope of their problem. I know this might hurt some brains out there but here goes- CO2 is a very heavy gas much more heavy than water vapor check out its specific gravity. Think of this very simple experiment: take dry ice (frozen CO2) and put it into water what happens – it fills the container then falls over the sides then it seeks low ground – the liberals on Broadway have been using it for years. Sure if you super-heat CO2 it could gain some altitude but not for long because it has a very low K value its Thermodynamic value to gain and hold energy. So it would drop like the gas rock it is. That is why so much is found on the ocean floor to become future fossil fuels. Also as you gain altitude the amount of CO2 is almost non-existent this is one set of data hidden in the discussion. Another thing to think about, the next time you drink a carbonated soda remember that the bubbles coming out of your drink is non-other than that poison of the environment “CO2”!!!

      Reply this comment
    • John
      John 27 January, 2016, 12:29

      Here’s a question for you “Marty”. Explain how we have 4,500 years of history to support the claim that global warming is a true issue. America alone has invested far too much money towards global warming, which we know almost nothing about.

      Reply this comment
    • Steven Manders
      Steven Manders 31 October, 2019, 16:28

      Marty, your “facts” are all wrong. Climate fluctuates, but not on a 1,500 year cycle. Man has warmed the climate by 0.85 C in the last 50 years or so, and by 3 C in the Arctic. No, that wont make us burn in hell, and not cost trillions of dollars to do something. Your comments are what I would expect by a bunch of men who were drinking at a bar, not technically meaningful

      Reply this comment
  6. melbrookes
    melbrookes 30 September, 2011, 14:02

    global warming hoax is required for globalists to run the world. and just who are these arrogant elitists who think “they”” can run the entire world?

    I think I know the name of one…..

    Reply this comment
  7. janecobb
    janecobb 4 April, 2012, 08:06

    I’m just glad this hot debate is over with, I mean, why focus on global warming when we could be working on economy or end world hunger?

    Reply this comment
  8. Ben
    Ben 30 April, 2012, 09:21

    Since this story has been debunked several times and the editor of Remote Sensing resigned over it and apologized for its publication, shouldn’t this be taken down?

    Reply this comment
  9. CalWatchdog
    CalWatchdog 30 April, 2012, 16:33

    Ben: We’re not in the habit of placing our articles of this type down the “memory hole,” but will provide corrections or retractions if necessary. That the editor resigned might be because he suffered political pressure from the global-warming establishment. As the Climategate emails have shown, that establishment is very powerful politically. If you wish, please provide a refutation of the evidence in the original article on which Katy Grimes based her story. I’ll put it up here as a comment. We welcome debate.

    — John Seiler, managing editor.

    Reply this comment
  10. Brian
    Brian 16 May, 2012, 23:54

    Excellent Article ! I too have been researching this subject and what I have found is alarming to say the least. Many folks have no idea where this myth is going to lead us. Just do a little research on Agenda 21 and one can see clearly that they ( the US government )are hell bent on taking private property from citizens,through regulations and new laws. what is the most alarming is that most of these new regulations & laws originate from agencies outside of the US. They are already taking and rezoning privately held wetlands throughout the US.

    Much of my personal research has lead me to the conclusion that the US has been working behind citizens backs, with the European Union in one big land-grab. Even the European Union has a manual for American citizens that states ” The USA is encouraged to join the European Union, but must understand they need to give up some of their sovereignty to become a member.” They want YOUR land for the Queen!
    Her financial adviser is pushing for a “World Currency & his new weather graphics website ” They really want your GPS coordinates and address!

    Another interesting point is that the last countries seeking admission to the EU are Romania & Turkey. Whats my point? Well, go to the European Unions website and look at the map,check out what countries are attached to the base of Turkey, Iran, Iraq & Syria. Is all this turmoil and war an accident, or due to the expansionist policy’s of the EU? They already have written of their plan, most Americans probably never even read it. Here is some of their ideas on how they will use YOUR PROPERTY ,please take the time to read it.

    Reply this comment
  11. Brian
    Brian 17 May, 2012, 00:16

    PS: Here is a link to the man who stands to gain the most perpetuating this Global warming scheme.

    Reply this comment
  12. James
    James 1 September, 2012, 18:49

    what’s the matter you pathetic scaretactic alarmists, your global warming hoax has been exposed more than this, especially with wiki leaks, proving thousands of emails with scientists faking data to fit their fictional facts on global warming, so please……… meanwhile I’m driving my big 8 cylinder high performance SUV with extreme pleasure!!

    Reply this comment
  13. dumb
    dumb 21 October, 2012, 13:12

    im sick of US policies , you americans need to wake up.

    Reply this comment
  14. Bill
    Bill 13 November, 2012, 16:57

    As with politics, military ect……. In truth, we only and will always ONLY know what we are allowed to know…. I do not rely on what NASA says just because they are NASA.. Of course they are gonna say what they have to to keep their jobs.

    I will continue to listen to the Earth, our progressive weather and the ever changing quality of our air..
    It does NOT require a Rocket Scientist to figure out that we are only hurting ourselves and the future of next generations.
    Even if it were not so,, I am not really that interested in continuing to make the Arab Nations wealthy from my sweat… Myself, I will continue to give my money to American companies,,,,

    Reply this comment
  15. tj
    tj 19 April, 2013, 10:00

    its the illuminati

    Reply this comment
  16. GL
    GL 2 May, 2013, 21:47

    Dear Global Warming Sheeps, I have some shares in lets say Solyndra would you like to buy them?

    Reply this comment
  17. The Truth
    The Truth 18 November, 2013, 20:36

    We haven’t been around long enough with this Magnatude of pollution , to say that global warming isnt real. Research that, why are the caps melting? Why is hotter every year longer? It’s The Middle Of Noveember and it’s 20 degrees warmer then it was 10 years ago .. So that 8 degrees and .05 degrees is BS!! Explain That!?
    so someone who believes that global warming is fake… Please!… Enlighten me? TY

    Reply this comment
    • Mitchina
      Mitchina 6 October, 2015, 07:35

      How can I be certain that Global Warming is a bunch of bull? Easy, I have freaking common sense – by far the most dangerous American there is to the established liberal elite machine. There is a difference between pollution and what these morons are saying. Yes, we need to be mindful of polluting our planet – that I agree with, but that is not what the zealots are saying. They are lying, self serving bastards, all of them.

      Al Gore made a striking prediction; “The North Polar ice cap is falling off a cliff. It could be completely gone in summer in as little as seven years. Seven years from now.” Since then recent satellite images show that not only have the icecaps not melted but they’ve expanded in size by 43% to 63% and since 2002, the ocean temperatures have fluctuated less than 1 degree. the world has warmed .36 degrees Fahrenheit over the last 35 years (they started measuring the data in 1979 and Global warming reversed its rise in 1998.

      Did you know that In 2001, before leaving office as vice president, Gore was worth less than $2 million. Since then, he has grown his wealth to $100 million, almost entirely by investing in a handful of “green-tech” companies; 14 of which received more than $2.5 billion in loans, grants, tax breaks, and more from the Obama administration? I don’t get any fuzzy feelings from politicians about anything, let alone think they are EVER telling me the truth.

      Temperatures have only risen .36 degrees since 1979 and the bulk of that rise was in the 1990s. Earth’s temperatures rise and fall based on its exposure to the sun. Are we now going to claim mankind is killing the sun?

      $22 billion of taxpayers’ money – the amount that the U.S. gvt spends to stop the “global warming” epidemic. That comes out to $41,856 every minute. Or, to put it in perspective, that is twice as much as what our government spends on securing our borders.

      See how the so called scientific (the politically threatened or bought scientists) facts are NOT facts while the biggest individual polluters in the world are becoming super rich off this LIE!? You are so damn blind… follow the money.

      Reply this comment
  18. Harold Faulkner
    Harold Faulkner 26 June, 2014, 14:00


    People in the USA, are being told by the U.S. government and media that global warming is man-made. If that is true, how can the government and media explain the high temperatures the earth has experienced in past years when there were far fewer people? Let us look back in the world’s history: for example, between roughly 900AD and 1350AD the temperatures were much higher than now. And, back then there were fewer people, no cars, no electric utilities, and no factories, etc. So what caused the earth’s heat? Could it be a natural occurrence? The temperature graph at the bottom of this article shows the temperatures of the earth before Christ to 2040.

    In the book THE DISCOVERERS published in February 1985 by Daniel J. Boorstin, beginning in chapter 28, it goes into detail about Eric the Red, the father of Lief Ericsson, and how he discovered an island covered in green grass.

    In approximately 983AD, Eric the Red committed murder, and was banished from Iceland for three years. Eric the Red sailed 500 miles west from Iceland and discovered an island covered in GREEN grass, which he named Greenland. Greenland reminded Eric the Red of his native Norway because of the grass, game animals, and a sea full of fish. Even the air provided a harvest of birds. Eric the Red and his crew started laying out sites for farms and homesteads, as there was no sign of earlier human habitation.

    When his banishment expired, Eric the Red returned to congested Iceland to gather Viking settlers. In 986, Eric the Red set sail with an emigrant fleet of twenty-five ships carrying men, women, and domestic animals. Unfortunately, only fourteen ships survived the stormy passage, which carried about four-hundred-fifty immigrants plus the farm animals. The immigrants settled on the southern-west tip and up the western coast of Greenland.

    After the year 1200AD, the Earth’s and Greenland’s climate grew colder; ice started building up on the southern tip of Greenland. Before the end of 1300AD, the Viking settlements were just a memory. You can find the above by searching Google. One link is:

    The following quote you can also read about why there is global warming. This is from the book EINSTEIN’S UNIVERSE, Page 63, written by Nigel Calder in 1972, and updated in 1982.

    “The reckoning of planetary motions is a venerable science. Nowadays it tells us, for example, how gravity causes the ice to advance or retreat on the Earth during the ice ages. The gravity of the Moon and (to a lesser extent) of the Sun makes the Earth’s axis swivel around like a tilted spinning top. Other planets of the Solar System, especially Jupiter, Mars and Venus, influence the Earth’s tilt and the shape of its orbit, in a more-or-less cyclic fashion, with significant effects on the intensity of sunshine falling on different regions of the Earth during the various seasons. Every so often a fortunate attitude and orbit of the Earth combine to drench the ice sheets in sunshine as at the end of the most recent ice age, about ten thousand years ago. But now our relatively benign interglacial is coming to an end, as gravity continues to toy with our planet.”

    The above points out that the universe is too huge and the earth is too small for the earth’s population to have any effect on the earth’s temperature. The earth’s temperature is a function of the sun’s temperature and the effects from the many massive planets in the universe, i.e., “The gravity of the Moon and (to a lesser extent) of the Sun makes the Earth’s axis swivel around like a tilted spinning top. Other planets of the Solar System, especially Jupiter, Mars and Venus, influence the Earth’s tilt and the shape of its orbit, in a more-or-less cyclic fashion, with significant effects on the intensity of sunshine falling on different regions of the Earth during the various seasons.”

    Read below about carbon dioxide, which we need in order to exist. You can find the article below at:

    Of the 186 billion tons of carbon from CO2 that enter earth’s atmosphere each year from all sources, only 6 billion tons are from human activity. Approximately 90 billion tons come from biologic activity in earth’s oceans and another 90 billion tons from such sources as volcanoes and decaying land plants.

    At 380 parts per million CO2 is a minor constituent of earth’s atmosphere–less than 4/100ths of 1% of all gases present. Compared to former geologic times, earth’s current atmosphere is CO2- impoverished.

    CO2 is odorless, colorless, and tasteless. Plants absorb CO2 and emit oxygen as a waste product. Humans and animals breathe oxygen and emit CO2 as a waste product. Carbon dioxide is a nutrient, not a pollutant, and all life– plants and animals alike– benefit from more of it. All life on earth is carbon-based and CO2 is an essential ingredient. When plant-growers want to stimulate plant growth, they introduce more carbon dioxide.

    CO2 that goes into the atmosphere does not stay there, but continuously recycled by terrestrial plant life and earth’s oceans– the great retirement home for most terrestrial carbon dioxide.

    If we are in a global warming crisis today, even the most aggressive and costly proposals for limiting industrial carbon dioxide emissions and all other government proposals and taxes would have a negligible effect on global climate!

    The government is lying, trying to use global warming to limit, and tax its citizens through “cap and trade” and other tax schemes for the government’s benefit. We, the people cannot allow this to happen.

    The Earth’s Temperature Graph should be shown below:

    If the Earth’s temperature graph is not shown above, you can see this temperature graph at the link:

    You can copy the temperature graph and place it in your computer.

    Reply this comment
    • Mitchina
      Mitchina 6 October, 2015, 07:38

      Stop, just STOP WITH ALL THE TRUTH, FACTS and Common Sense stuff. Gesh.. you may be responsible for the cranial explosion of millions of people. I think that is enough guilt to silence you but if that doesn’t work, soon the knock at your door will be the U.S. Gvt… there to “help” you.

      Reply this comment
  19. Lamar
    Lamar 11 September, 2014, 10:53

    Global Warming should be outlawed

    Reply this comment
  20. Grey
    Grey 17 November, 2014, 04:38

    When people claim consensus it’s not science it’s a religion, When people demonize skeptics, it’s not science, it’s religion. Without skeptics science could not exist.

    Reply this comment
  21. Phil blackwell
    Phil blackwell 18 February, 2019, 15:02

    Any journalists out there writing articles about man made global warming causing all the bad weather ie. polar vortex, and getting government money as a subsidy! The Canadian Trudeau gov’t has approved 600,000,000$ to hand out to the media for Trudeau approved production and articles about global warming and the pollutant c02?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

CalPERS ignores Legislature on Iran

Feb. 25, 2010 By KATY GRIMES Nearly three years ago, California legislators passed AB221 requiring the sale of investments in

Top 20 Worst Bills To Veto

CalWatchdog thought that today’s 2010 TOP TWENTY BILLS TO VETO by The Flash Report, was worthy of sharing. Compiled by Senator Mimi

KFI’s John & Ken discuss ‘Browndoggle’ with CWD’s Chris Reed

March 16. 2013 In an interview with CalWatchdog contributor Chris Reed, KFI 640 AM’s John and Ken discussed the fiasco