Initiative reform — one bridge short
As someone who participated in the working group on initiative reform package that ended up as SB1253 by state Sen. Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, and signed by Gov. Jerry Brown last week — I can say the bill is, well, okay as far as it goes. But to invert a title used for a World War II book, A Bridge Too Far — which tells the story of the Allies trying to go too far with a battle strategy — the initiative reform in my mind came up one bridge short. In other words, it did not go far enough.
The bill lengthens the signature gathering period a month, a plus for grassroots organizations. It allows proposition proponents to pull an initiative if a legislative compromise is reached, an incentive for ballot measure authors to work with the Legislature and vice-versa; and certainly a step that can save state money and voter aggravation.
The measure also brings the Legislature into initiative discussions early. Once proponents collected 25 percent of the signatures needed to qualify for the ballot, the Legislature would hold committee hearings on the measure. This, of course, means additional work for committee staff and members and those who count the signatures.
Tim Draper’s unsuccessful Six Californias initiative, under these rules, would have had its day in front of legislative committees (and one would assume be covered by many media observers).
Last bridge
However, SB1253 didn’t cross the last, crucial bridge.
Discussed endlessly in the work group was the sensitive issue of writing the titles and summaries for ballot initiatives. Currently, that job resides with the attorney general.
Attorneys general of both parties have been criticized over the years for slanting titles and summaries to benefit certain political interests. This should not come as a shock because the attorney general is a partisan officer.
That is why many supported turning over the initiative title and summary authorship to a more neutral party. The idea of removing the job of writing a ballot initiative title and summary from a partisan elected official is one I long supported, as I recommended in 2011 at a conference sponsored by the Supreme Court Historical Society and the League of Women Voters.
That reform did not make it into SB 1253 — a bridge too far for a majority of the working group and Steinberg, but a bridge that should be crossed.
Related Articles
Uneasy balancing act for CA economy
California headed into 2016 with a stabilizing economy that nonetheless left many residents uneasy. On the work front, the year
State's Unions Win Another Court Battle
The state worker furlough situation is getting curiouser and curiouser. Yesterday Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch ruled that
CA lawmakers back in the saddle again
SACRAMENTO — After a nice long winter's rest, the California Legislature is back in the saddle again. And they hit
