‘Sin tax’ would burn cigar-smoking lawmakers


220px-Four_cigars

Tobacco taxes are relatively easy for lawmakers to pass because they are a tax on a hated and “sinful” habit — smoking. But the smoking tax proposed in SB 768 would extend to cigars, a  favorite vice of many lawmakers and Capitol elites.

There are several chichi cigar lounges within walking distance of the Capitol, where in many cases the real political business of the state takes place.

A sin tax is a state-mandated tax added to products or activities seen as vices, such as alcohol, tobacco and gambling. These taxes are levied by governments ostensibly to discourage use without making the products illegal, while raking off taxes to pay for government programs.

Smoke tax

SB 768 is by Sen. Kevin DeLeon, D-Los Angeles. It would boost cigarette taxes $2 per pack. As I wrote earlier, the bill likely would promote cigarette smuggling.

But this bill is more than just a $2 per pack tax on cigarettes. SB 768 also targets cigar and pipe tobacco by creating a disproportionate tax increase on these products. Because of how the state excise tax works, there is no cap on the amount of tax that can be charged on cigars or pipe tobacco. If SB 768 passes, the state excise tax applied to cigars would go from 31 percent per cigar, to 75 percent.

On top of that, the state and local sales tax — as high as 10 percent in some cities — would be charged. Plus the recently enacted federal excise tax of 52.4 percent on cigars.

Total: California consumers would pay a total tax rate of 137.4 percent per cigar. This translates into nearly $1.40 in taxes for every $1 of product.

This tax reminds me of a car I rented while on a visit to Seattle: The city taxes cost me more than the actual cost to rent the car.

Tobacco products

Tobacco products are an important source of revenue for the nearly 34,000 retailers in California. According to the National Association of Convenience Stores, tobacco sales account for 35 percent of all in-store sales.  Many of these retailers are small “mom and pop” stores that specifically cater to the cigar and pipe market.

SB 768 will irreparably harm these retailers and small businesses by forcing them to cut jobs or even close their business altogether.

We’ve already seen this happen. After Proposition 10 was passed in 1999 and the tobacco tax rose by 50 cents, there was a 26 percent decrease in the taxable sales of tobacco within two years, forcing many retailers out of business. Because of the federal excise tax, the maximum tax rate on large cigars has surged more than 700 percent and has already resulted in significant layoffs within the cigar industry, according to Stogie News.

States with high tobacco taxes open the door to smuggling and black market sales. This illegal activity puts a strain on law enforcement and results in a loss of revenue to businesses, as well as to the state.

According to a January study by the Tax Foundation, 60 percent of the cigarettes sold in New York state are smuggled from other states or Indian reservations with lower tobacco taxes.

According to a CNN summary of the study, “The report said that tobacco smuggling and the tax rate have risen practically in tandem since 2006. The New York State tax on cigarettes has risen 190% since that time, as the rate of smuggling increased 170%.”

Tax hit

The State Board of Equalization has found that California will actually lose hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue if SB 768 passes.  Even legislators have become weary of funding programs using tobacco tax revenue because of its instability.

Californians aren’t the biggest fans of tobacco taxes anyway. In 2006, voters rejected a $2 tax on tobacco and more recently, in 2012, a $1 tax on tobacco. What makes politicians think Californians will be supportive now?

Smokers have always been easy targets, but there’s a bigger picture here. SB 768 will negatively affect our economy, jobs and the livelihood of millions of Californians.

 

By Katy Grimes

12 comments

Write a comment
  1. Rex the Wonderdog!
    Rex the Wonderdog! 19 July, 2013, 11:42

    More taxes-YES, just what we need!

    Reply this comment
  2. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 19 July, 2013, 12:17

    Poodle get back to your snow cone machine/ career job at the Adelanto truck stop.

    Reply this comment
  3. Dyspeptic
    Dyspeptic 19 July, 2013, 13:56

    “Tobacco taxes are relatively easy for lawmakers to pass because they are a tax on a hated and “sinful” habit — smoking.”

    Scratch a “Progressive” and you will always find an uptight, Puritanical, meddlesome hypocrite just beneath the surface. So if it is sinful or unethical to profit from a dangerous substance like tobacco, isn’t it just as unethical to derive any income or revenue from this great scourge of humanity, i.e. from tax revenue?

    Hey Uhaul, you seem awfully familiar with truck stop culture. Hows that toilet cleaning job a Terrible Herbst working out for ya?

    Reply this comment
  4. Dyspeptic
    Dyspeptic 19 July, 2013, 14:08

    Hey Uhaul, I forgot one more thing. When you clean those restrooms at The Herbst, don’t forget to restock the butt gaskets!

    Reply this comment
  5. Steele, Ted, When only the very best will do!
    Steele, Ted, When only the very best will do! 19 July, 2013, 14:57

    Poor Dysphoric—- an opinion about EVERYthing and always wrong!

    LOL!

    Reply this comment
  6. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 19 July, 2013, 15:35

    Teddy….Dys has no life but posting at his doomer dungeon in his Kmart skivvies…

    Reply this comment
  7. jimmydeeoc
    jimmydeeoc 19 July, 2013, 21:48

    Uhaul. Your “clever” personal attacks are so tiresome. You have demonstrated nothing more than a fairly broad knowledge of the Mojave’s High Desert.

    Reply this comment
  8. Queeg
    Queeg 20 July, 2013, 08:39

    Jimbo….that is where CWD posters post at the local desert librairies in mobile single wides….if no levity….CWD posters on balance are very alarming and should be under strict observation and pacification meds….

    Reply this comment
  9. The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm)
    The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm) 20 July, 2013, 13:09

    Jimmy— I find Queeg’s posts refreshing. Short on punctuation, but dense with gonzo observation about the sad confluence of doomer and the small mobile home movement.

    Relax little buddy, we’re all hoping your sad life get’s better! Buck up!

    The Ted Unit

    Reply this comment
  10. Queeg
    Queeg 20 July, 2013, 19:11

    Punctuation unappreciated by inland rednecks anyway….if CWD wants an urban poet…..got the wrong poster.

    Reply this comment
  11. The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm)
    The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm) 21 July, 2013, 08:15

    Queeg— Remember. the brilliant poet ee cummings wasn’t i big punctuator either! You’re in good company.

    Reply this comment
  12. Queeg
    Queeg 21 July, 2013, 19:57

    Yeah know that Cummmings….he invented the P-51 Mustang engine……must a moonlighted writin!

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Will unions now thank Wall Street?

Steven Greenhut: Last week, I was a witness on a mock trial at Freedom Fest, in which public employee unions

David Cay Johnston replies to my tax blog

Due to some technical problems, David Cay Johnston’s reply to my blog, “Tax increases boost jobs?,” was delayed two days

New PPIC election Poll

Katy Grimes: A new poll just released by the Public Policy Institute of California of  2,002 people surveyed reports, “Jerry