Investigating the CA Delta

Investigating the CA Delta

Stop the TunnelsBefore attending an event for the Pacific Research Institute, CalWatchdog.com’s parent think tank, earlier this month I drove around two areas of California I had not been to: the Delta and Silicon Valley. California is such a vast state that even the late Huell Howser only scratched the surface in his hundreds of documentaries on the Golden State. But I wanted to see first hand these two areas that we often write about.

One  shocking thing about Northern California is how horrible the roads are. Not just the back roads, but the main freeways and state arteries: I-80, I-680, I-580, I-880, I-280, I-5, 101, 82, 84, 1 and numerous others. All are crumbling.

That’s the same as in Southern California. I often drive on the roads in Los Angeles and Orange counties, and all are uniformly bad.

This is a scandal for a state as wealthy as California. And it’s a contrast to when I was in the U.S. Army and was posted to California in 1978 to learn Russian at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey. I was amazed at how great the roads were, uniformly smooth with reflector lights across the white and yellow stripes in the middle. It contrasted with the roads in my native Michigan, which have to be rebuilt every spring after the assault of the harsh winters. For several years after the 1974 Depression that damaged the state, and sent the auto industry into its long decline, the repairs had not been adequate.

The California roads of 1987, when I came here to write for the Orange County Register, were not as sparkling as those of 1978. Yet they still were in fairly good condition. But today the state’s roads are those of the Third World.

The culprit was Gov. Jerry Brown during his first stint as governor, 1975-1983. He declared an “era of limits” and sharply cut back on road construction. He was wrong. The state’s population has risen from 20 million in 1970 to 38 million today — nearly doubling. So we have a state infrastructure built for 20 million people but which carries 38 million.

Now he wants to “solve” the problem by building the $68 billion (probably much more) California High-Speed Rail. How many of these rickety roads could be fixed for that money?

The Delta

My friend Steven Greenhut, now the UT-San Diego’s new California columnist, lives near Sacramento and drove me around the Delta. The Delta is made up of thousands of levees built in the late 19th Century largely by immigrant Chinese laborers. Some of their descendants still live in the area. But as with most Americans, most Chinese have moved on to larger cities.

The area now largely is know for its farming, irrigated by the levees. I saw vast farms of corn and pears.

The old buildings in the towns there now are being transformed into quaint boutiques. We had lunch at Al’s Place in the city of Locke. It looks like a “hole in the wall place” but now is fairly famous, and serves great steak.

Brown Caltrans Web siteThe area’s roads, typically crumbling, are dotted with “Stop the Tunnels” signs. They reference Brown’s plan to build tunnels under the Delta at a cost of $23 billion. Supposedly this would solve the “problem” of the Delta now producing the wrong mix of inland water from the mountains and saltwater from the Pacific Ocean.

As my colleague Wayne Lusvardi has written on CalWatchdog.com, the tunnels would be another expensive, wasteful, unneeded Brown boondoggle. They would destroy the current Delta ecosystem and uproot the lives of the farmers and others whom I saw in the Delta.

Caltrans reportedly has been ripping up the anti-tunnels signs people are posting on their front lawns next to state roads. Do you think they will rip down Brown’s campaign signs during his expected 2014 re-election bid? His picture now appears in the top left corner of their Web site. He’s their boss.

6 comments

Write a comment
  1. Wayne Lusvardi
    Wayne Lusvardi 31 July, 2013, 15:45

    What the proposed Delta Tunnels are is an unnecessary waste because Northern California front organizations — called environmental organizations — have mad anything but the most expensive option for re-engineering the Delta the ONLY option. The reason tunnels are being considered is because the “locals” don’t want surface canals through their farms and communities.

    But Southern California needs to find some way to replace water lost to Arizona from the Colorado River. And water deliveries from northern have been drastically cut due to bogus lawsuits over the Delta smelt (which still are continuing even though the National Resources Defense Council lost their case. Another smelt court case is proceeding regarding the Federal controlled Central Valley Project).

    It is interesting to note that Texas has had a drought and took $2 billion out of their general fund reserves for water system improvements. Meanwhile it may be years before California gets any new reservoirs because of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). There is no such counterpart environmental law in Texas.

    Reply this comment
  2. Bill - San Jose
    Bill - San Jose 31 July, 2013, 16:35

    Brown introduced unions to public workers. Cost of government x 1000.
    Brown leveraged a bad run in Oakland into an even worse run in Sacto.

    Saw a bumper sticker today:

    “Work Harder! Millions of people on welfare on depending on you.”

    Nuff said.

    Reply this comment
  3. stolson
    stolson 1 August, 2013, 08:14

    Well, what is the best overall plan, then?

    Reply this comment
  4. Gary
    Gary 1 August, 2013, 09:45

    As a John Muir conservationist/Conservative I say we need to halt the rape of the Delta by both parties. Sending water south to make sure 2,000,000 illegals can have a drink is insane.

    Reply this comment
  5. double l
    double l 1 August, 2013, 16:03

    Regarding the roads of CA, the money changers are not willing to maintain the roads despite the amount of money that is generated through fuel taxes.
    Regarding the Delta, a prominent farmer from the Delta suggested that the current flow be improved by dredging and rebuilding the levees. A peripheral canal or tunneling through the Delta would rate right up there with the high speed rail fiasco.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Steinberg rushing arena bill through last days of session

Strange bedfellows are camping out under the bleachers to oppose an arena in Sacramento for the Kings pro basketball team.

Ballot initiative pits water against high-speed rail

What’s more important: High-speed rail or water? Proponents of a proposed ballot measure would force voters to choose just that. The

CA GOP labors to read Latino tea leaves

Though the political ground has been shifting in California, new research is giving Republicans only hints about how to woo Latino voters. Much