Solar power no help during CA’s late peak winter hours

Solar power no help during CA’s late peak winter hours


Solar power tower, wikimediaSolar power is popular nowadays as a “renewable,” non-polluting energy source. It helps California comply with AB32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which mandates a 25 percent reduction in greenhouse gases in the state by 2020.

“Even on short winter days, California is breaking solar energy records,” declared environmental writer Chris Clarke on the website of KCET, America’s largest independent public TV station, which broadcasts across Southern California.

Clarke was jubilant that solar power had generated more than 2,800 megawatts of electricity just before noon on that day. There also was 1,898 megawatts of rooftop solar power generated on Dec. 4, but that was for the entire 24-hour day.  

Archived data for Dec. 4 is not available from the California Independent System Operator’s (ISO) website. So I double-checked the amount of solar power flowing into the state energy grid for Thursday, Dec. 11.  The numbers tell a different story.

Having served on the California Energy Crisis Task Force in 2001 for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (to which I currently have no affiliation of any kind), I believe I can competently double-check the claims about a major breakthrough for solar energy in California.  To understand the numbers that follow, it should be understood that a megawatt is enough electricity to power about 1,000 homes for one hour during non-peak load hours and a kilowatt is enough for one home for one hour.

Solar power marginally helpful during mid-day

During the midday hours from 2:30 to 5:30 p.m., it was true that solar power was producing from 6.77 to 8.15 percent of demand, as shown below:

Solar Contribution to CA Power Grid for Dec. 11 Mid Day Hours

Time Total Megawatts Solar Megawatts Generated Solar Percent of Total Power Demand
2:30 pm 28,500 2,200 7.72%
3:30 pm 28,000 2,000 7.14%
4:30 pm 27,000 2,200 8.15%
5:30 pm 31,000 2,100 6.77%
Source: Cal-ISO, Dec. 11, 2013  Note: All excerpted from charts so numbers are approximate

Solar power not helpful during late hour peak load in winter 

The problem is that, in California, the peak demand for electricity comes late in the day, from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m., especially on cold winter nights such as Dec. 11.  During those hours, solar energy only contributed 5.07 percent at 6:30 pm, 1.48 percent at 7:30 pm, and zero percent from 8:30 pm onward, as shown below.

Solar Contribution to CA Power Grid for Dec. 11 Late Peak Hours

Time Peak Hour Demand Megawatts Solar Megawatts Generated Solar Percent of Total Power Demand
Noon MID DAY PEAK 27,000 1,750 6.48%
6: 30 pm SUNSET HOUR PEAK 31,500 1,600 5.08%
7:30 pm 27,000 400 1.48%
8:30 pm 29,000 0 0%
9:30 pm WINTER LATE HOUR PEAK 31,500 0 0%
Midnight to midnight
24 hour day
703,000 11,700 1.66%
Source: Cal-ISO, Dec. 11, 2013  All numbers approximate

On December 11, there were two peaks in energy demand: one at 6:30 p.m. at 31,500 megawatts and another at 9 p.m., also at 31,500 megawatts.  The demand for electrical power at 7:30 p.m. was the same as for noon: 27,000 megawatts.    

During the entire 24-hour day of Dec. 11, solar energy contributed only 1.6 percent to the state power grid.

No demonstrable smog reduction

Moreover, there was no demonstrable decrease in air pollution on Dec. 11 that could be attributed to solar power’s output.  Unlike conventional power plants, solar power uses no fuel and thus does not emit air pollution.

But the mild 68 degree temperature in Los Angeles on Dec. 11 was not enough to produce an Inversion Layer effect, where warmer air at high elevations traps relatively cooler air below, creating a smog trap.  The South Coast Air Quality Management District reported air quality as “Good” for Dec. 11.  Remote centralized solar power plants may be reducing carbon dioxide emissions, but not within the crucial urban smog traps.


Here are the conclusions I was able to draw from comparing one winter day’s output of electricity from centralized solar power plants in California and imported solar power from surrounding states:

  1. Thus far, centralized solar power is only marginally helpful in managing peak power loads during the mid-afternoon.
  2. Centralized solar power is not helpful in managing sunset and late-hour peak power loads during the winter.
  3. Centralized solar power does not demonstrably reduce air pollution on mild temperature winter days due to the modest Inversion Layer effect in California on colder days.
  4. Solar power generation may have set a state record for megawatts generated on Dec. 4.  But, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administrationelectricity generated from solar photovoltaic and solar thermal power plants are the two highest-priced sources of power by a wide margin. Centralized solar power runs from 15.9 cents to 25.1 cents per kilowatt-hour on average.  This is compared to 6.65 cents per kilowatt-hour from an efficient natural gas power plant that reduces air pollution by two-thirds over a coal-power plant.  And electricity from a non-polluting hydropower plant only costs 8.89 cents per kilowatt-hour on average. 

The media reports of record-setting solar power output are misguiding. Centralized solar power is an expensive option that doesn’t help meet late hour peak energy demands from 6:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. in California, particularly during cold winter nights.

California has 10 existing large centralized solar power plants with a capacity of 713 megawatts and 14 pending solar power plants capable of producing 5,742 megawatts of power in the planning pipeline.

California can look forward to more hot solar power capacity, which won’t help in meeting late hour demands on cold winter nights, unless very expensive battery storage systems costing $250 to $4,500 per kilowatt hour are installed along electric transmission power line routes. A typical home in a mild climate uses 5,000 to 30,000 kilowatt hours of electricity per year to run its natural gas heater in their home.

California has a lot of new centralized solar power coming online and battery storage systems that are being built on environmentalist faith, not proven technology. Better keep a warm sweater for cold winter nights in California unless you want to a huge winter electric power bill.


Write a comment
  1. Kathleen
    Kathleen 14 December, 2013, 12:48

    Solar does not work well in fog either. Software for battery back-up sucks up much of the power, constantly charging the batteries. Home use should have a simplified home panel.

    Reply this comment
  2. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 14 December, 2013, 22:23

    Solar ranks up there with elixirs, tonics, snake oil distributed by tinkers in the Wild West.

    Reply this comment
  3. Wayne Lusvardi
    Wayne Lusvardi 15 December, 2013, 13:13

    Renewable energy is just a justification for building a Democratic Party constituency within the electric power industry that is beholden to politics for permanent subsidies. The air pollution won’t be reduced within California’s smog basins but in remote desert areas where there is no air pollution problem. This is the price of a mixed economy where political goals have to be mixed in with economic goals.

    If this is what Californians want then they will get enormous utility bills that will continually have to be offloaded onto the middle class and business in tiered electric rates. This will mean gutting conservation because a large part of the total electric ratepayers will be subsidized to run up their electric bills because others are paying for it. And California will eventually have to shift it lifestyle: reduced watching of Monday night football, no night soccer practice under lights, no evening church services (other than by candle light), and no turning on A/C or heat from 6:30 to 9 pm unless you want a big power bill for the month. These sacrifices will be justified as doing your part to clean the air when in reality it is your sacrifice to create redundant union jobs for a redundant green power system. But you can gloat about its moral superiority and the conspicuous consumption of your rooftop solar panels subsidized by other electric ratepayers.

    Reply this comment
  4. Dan Garreett
    Dan Garreett 17 December, 2013, 19:58

    I have solarpower on three homes I own. I have not had an electric bill since the installations were activated. I pay a $15.85 fee to be connected to the grid. Solar works great unless you are republican.

    Reply this comment
  5. Wayne Lusvardi
    Wayne Lusvardi 18 December, 2013, 11:15

    This sort of thinking reflects the new postmodern economy of California where everyone tries to find a subsidy at someone else’s expense instead of trying to build a true economy. California is transitioning to a mixed energy economy where 50% of it will depend on subsidies and the other 50% will have to carry the burden. Hey, look at me “I’ve go free solar” seems to be the boast. But there is no free lunch or free solar. The costs just get spread over all those electric ratepayers that don’t have rooftop solar systems.

    Reply this comment
  6. Queeg
    Queeg 20 December, 2013, 10:39


    You have a scrap heap of junk obsolete parts and a bogus warranty by pagama boy for future repairs. Solar is the biggest con since Hudson’s shiny beads to Manhsttan Indians!

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Root Canal For Single-Payer Health Bill

JAN. 26, 2012 By KATY GRIMES Despite warnings that tooth decay in children can lead to a life in prison,

Brown proposal would force local school tax increases

Feb. 12, 2013 By Wayne Lusvardi Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposed re-engineering of the California public school finance system takes a

Sweeping new legal challenge to bullet train

A massive California Environmental Quality Act lawsuit was filed June 4 in Sacramento Superior Court over the newly certified environmental