Do Californians want to raise oil taxes?

Do Californians want to raise oil taxes?


Thomas SteyerAre Californians ready for another tax increase?

That’s what California hedge-fund manager Tom Steyer sought to find out in his “People’s Poll” on whether voters would support an added oil extraction tax in California. The tax would be 9.9 percent on a barrel of oil. It would raise up to $2 billion a year.

Steyer is not new to pushing tax increases. In 2012, voters approved his Proposition 39, which increased taxes $1 billion for corporations headquartered in other states.

Steyer’s political advocacy organization, NextGen Climate, retained the Benenson Strategy Group to conduct a poll on the prospects for voter approval of a statewide oil-pumping tax.  The poll was conducted of 800 likely voters in California.

The major findings: 64 percent to 75 percent of likely voters supported a new oil extraction tax.

Loaded Questions

But the poll was based on questions such as:

Q17.  Suppose you knew California is the only one of 22 oil producing states where oil companies extract oil for free.  Given this, would you say you strongly support charging oil companies an extraction fee in California, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose it? “


Strongly support 48%
Somewhat support 27%
Somewhat oppose 9%
Somewhat oppose 10%
Don’t know 6%

The above is what is called a loaded question.  Loaded questions contain a presumption that the attacked group is guilty.

Q17 presumes that oil companies are guilty of extracting oil in California for free, which is clearly not the case.  It is the “truth” — as in a half truth — that California does not have an oil extraction tax.  However, it has corporate, sales and individual income taxes on oil that generate about the same revenues as oil extraction taxes from other states.

In 2008, William Hamm, who once ran the non-partisan Legislative Analyst’s Office in California, and colleague Jose Alberro conducted a study, “Comparison of Oil Tax Burdens in the Ten Largest Oil Producing States.”  This study documented that California’s oil taxes are about average.  However, if oil-extraction surtaxes would be charged in California, the state’s combined oil taxes would be 40 percent higher than the combined oil taxes of any other state.

Age Bias

The Steyer poll respondents also were over-represented by those more than 65 years of age compared to the California population age profile of the U.S. Census:

Age-Range –
Californians Polled/Counted

Percent Steyer Poll

U.S. Census


18 to 64



– 17.6%

65 to 84




Don’t Know



Younger adult Californians were under-surveyed by 17.6 percentage points. And older Californians were over-sampled by 16.6 percentage points compared to U.S. Census age profile data.

This is an important slant because older respondents who drive less or not at all would be expected to be less concerned about increasing oil and gasoline prices.

Un-Representative Sample

Steyer’s poll also subtly over-surveyed Democrats, Independent and No Party Preference voters over Republicans.

Republicans only comprised 25 percent of the respondents to the poll, but 28.6 percent of the registered voters, according to the California Secretary of State.

Independent/No Party Preference voters made up 36 percent of those polled, but were only 21 percent of registered voters.

No opposition

Another problem with the poll is that it was conducted outside the normal political environment of an election. In an actual election, oil companies and such anti-tax groups as the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association would be expected to run adds pointing out that an oil tax increase inevitably would be be paid by drivers through higher prices at the pump — at a time when prices already have been going up.

Any oil tax increase would be put on the Nov. 2016 ballot. Which means it’s also hard to see what the political climate would be in a presidential election year. For example, although the Democratic nominee for president almost certainly would win in California, if a recession occurs, Democratic voter turnout might be dampened, hurting support for a tax increase.

Earlier this year, Gov. Jerry Brown, running for his own re-election this year, rejected the Steyer tax. He said in January, “I don’t think this is the year for new taxes. When I went up and down the state campaigning for Proposition 30, I said it was temporary and it is going to be temporary. I just think we need everything we can to live within our means before going back again to try and get more taxes.” 

Voters approved Prop. 30 in 2012, which increased taxes $7 billion.


Write a comment
  1. Ed the Independent Contractor
    Ed the Independent Contractor 15 May, 2014, 17:15

    Another situation where some smug, wealthy fellow feels that he knows more about what we poor folks need. Steyer has a history of backing every controversial green cause to come along. This is just what the public needs. Incomes are shrinking, inflation is going wild and this joker thinks that increasing the cost of gasoline that is already in the $4.00+ range is a good idea. This won’t hurt the California economy. It will help cripple it. Won’t hurt Steyer as he is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Good thing we have people like him to propose taxes like this because he doesn’t like oil production.

    Reply this comment
  2. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 16 May, 2014, 11:39

    Gas was $4.60 a gallon for regular at my local station today, a record high.

    In March 2013, the day before the US invaded Iraq, I pad $1.37 a gallon in Las Vegas.

    Reply this comment
  3. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 16 May, 2014, 11:40

    CA only has a 35% poverty rate, and the average CA public employee is comping over $150K per year, top 5%, so the oil tax is justified as our highly esteemed troughers should be 1%ers.

    They are heros’ and deserve “:)

    Reply this comment
  4. bob
    bob 16 May, 2014, 13:47

    The moron Colliefornian (as Ahnode sez) voters will pass this and then wonder why the price of gas goes up.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:
Tom SteyerWayne Lusvardioil taxNextGen

Related Articles

Video: Peter Schiff on economic collapse

Can American economic policies continue failing? Will California’s real estate always go up? Interviewed by’s James Poulos, Peter Schiff

Debaters clash over allowing corporate free speech

This is the first article in a two-part series on the battle against corporate political speech. The U.S. Supreme Court’s

New High-Speed Rail business plan mainly raises questions

This is Part 1 of a three-part series on the Draft 2014 Business Plan of the California High-Speed Rail Authority.