CA air board may invalidate 1.3 million pollution-offset credits

CA air board may invalidate 1.3 million pollution-offset credits

ccarb_logoThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s repeated punishment of an Arkansas waste disposal firm has led the California Air Resources Board to consider invalidating 1.3 million environmental offset credits bought from the Arkansas company by California firms to offset the effects of air pollution.

On May 30, the U.S. EPA in Dallas ordered the Clean Harbors waste incineration facility in El Dorado, Ark., to pay a $39,900 penalty for manufacturing and using “16 regulated chemicals in excess of established reporting thresholds” in 2011. The EPA had previously fined Clean Harbors $581,236 for other violations of hazardous waste standards.

The day before the EPA’s latest fine, the air board had already issued a notice to industrial holders and traders of renewable energy certificates from Clean Harbors that their certificates could be invalidated because the facility may been noncompliant in 2011. CARB can invalidate credits for up to eight years after implementation of a pollution reduction project.

Offset credits are tradable energy commodities that represent one ton of avoided ozone emissions. California industries can buy them to meet air pollution reduction requirements in the Golden State — even if the avoided emissions are in another state. None of the questionable credits were issued under California’s cap-and-trade emissions reduction program.

Retiring refrigerators in Arkansas to comply with CA rules

clean.harbors.arkThe credits in question were issued for retiring old refrigerators that contained chlorofluorocarbons (also known as CFCs or Freon) that are believed to contribute to ozone depletion in the upper atmosphere. This kind of credit is called an Ozone Depleting Substance or ODS credit.

The ODS credits sell for $5 to $10 per ton. That means the California firms’ potentially invalidated credits cost from $6.5 million to $13 million. State holders of these credits include EOS Climate, Diversified Pure Chemical, Environmental Credit Corporation, Wilshire Standard Offsets and Pure Chemical Separation.

According to a chemicals and energy trade website, 87 percent of the 5.5 million ozone depletion credits issued by CARB were from the Clean Harbors facility. The 1.3 million credits now being reviewed are for the period that Clean Harbors was deemed potentially non-compliant.

In 2009, Clean Harbors was cited by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality for 47 violations of its operating permit.

Among the many problems: chemical clouds and leaks;  explosions and fires; mishandling of waste materials;  failure to respond to a hazardous waste emergency; failure to design, construct, maintain and operate the facility to minimize fire, explosions, releases of materials into the air, soil or water; failure to provide adequate liability insurance; and poor record-keeping.

In December 2012, neighboring residents of the Clean Harbors plant were subject to a voluntary evacuation due to a chemical fire.

Clean Harbors and client defend company’s record

Clean Harbors officials downplayed the actions of regulators. “We have compliantly destroyed hundreds of thousands of kilograms or chlorofluorocarbons at our state-of-the-art hazardous waste incineration facility,” a spokesperson said.

Jeff Cohen of EOS Climate, a San Francisco-based pollution credit brokerage firm that did business with Clean Harbors, also downplayed the penalties. He said the actions that led to the fines against the company had “no impact” on its ozone-reduction operations.

“I expect ARB will ultimately conclude that too and all the credits will remain valid,” Cohen said.

The state air board will issue a determination on whether the credits are acceptable 30 days after officials believe they have received all necessary information on the matter.


Write a comment
  1. Dork
    Dork 10 June, 2014, 16:57

    (also known as CFCs or Freon) that are believed to contribute to ozone depletion in the upper atmosphere

    At least they admit in the article that it is a belief and NOT A FACT or SCIENCE.
    When I was required to take a test in 1995 for my refrigerant license the Very First Sentence stated this very thing.

    We know there is no evidence to support our belief, but the need is so great we are banning them just in case.

    something to that effect is what it said.

    Reply this comment
  2. Wayne Lusvardi
    Wayne Lusvardi 11 June, 2014, 14:27

    Mr. Dork

    The word “belief” was not the words of the California Air Resources Board by the writer/reporter. Reputable scientists dispute any link between CFC’s or Freon and depletion of the ozone layer or global warming.

    Thank you for your knowledgeable comment.

    Reply this comment
  3. Hondo
    Hondo 11 June, 2014, 20:45

    Hey, this is ‘settled science’. Just like global warming. And we really didn’t just have the coldest winter in recorded history in North America either.
    This subject is so boring but so important. Obama’s EPA and Kali’s air board are doing their best to shut down all forms fossil fuel for generating power. Don’t they remember when Kali lost power in 2001 or so? Brown outs (a great name considering who is guv now) may come back soon. They’ll just blame in on Reagan.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

The San Diego Union-Tribune endorses a Democrat for president, first time ever

For the first time in its 148-year history, The San Diego Union-Tribune endorsed a Democrat for president — Hillary Clinton.

It's Illegal to Doubt Global Warming

John Seiler: A little-known codicil of AB 32 makes it illegal to question the existence of global warming or AB

When heroes become bureaucrats

JULY 26, 2011 This article first appeared in City Journal. By STEVEN GREENHUT On Memorial Day, a suicidal man waded