Early release from CA prisons now a flood

Early release from CA prisons now a flood

prison - california department of corrections photo

Spurred by a series of court decisions ruling the state’s prison crowding unconstitutional, Gov. Jerry Brown’s ongoing “realignment” effort sought to make adequate room for the state’s worst convicts by diverting lesser criminals to county jails. There, however, the changes have caused a snowball effect. A recent Los Angeles Times investigation has shown that newly encumbered counties turned to early release to lighten their own load — sending serious offenders back out on the streets with only a fraction of time served.

Analyzing jail data, the Times discovered that “incarceration in some counties has been curtailed or virtually eliminated for a variety of misdemeanors, including parole violations, domestic violence, child abuse, drug use and driving under the influence.” In Los Angeles County, where one in four jailed Californians are found, 10 percent of time served was “often” enough to release male inmates back into society, compared to just 5 percent for female inmates.

With a prison system as complex and bureaucratic as California’s, the perils of early release have proven to be just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences. In recent months, for instance, even parole violators have wound up in county, not state, jails. Los Angeles County has had to add 500 staffers to cope with the new flood of probationers, while Riverside County alone has added over 140.

The cumulative effect has been a so-called “revolving door” in the jail system, with the line blurring between the incarcerated and the law-abiding public. Dangerous inmates have left jail prematurely, only to return on fresh charges; even parolees who didn’t revisit jail on parole violations have remained part of the administrative system, which has incorporated automated kiosks to help supervise released cons.

According to the Times investigation, the sheer numbers of Californians involved have raised profound doubts about how long the current improvised system can go on. In 2011, California averaged 9,700 released inmates per month. Now, that number has reached 13,500 a month, with more than 17,400 hitting the streets in October alone.

Realigning cash

State and county officials said it’s an open secret that legislators knew about realignment’s consequences. That made it easy for localities to hit up Sacramento for a quick infusion of substantial funds — $850 million last fiscal year and over $1 billion this time around, according to state corrections department spokesman Luis Patino.

The flood of money following the flood of inmates has created incentives for an even larger state-funded prison system. Although realignment has reduced the state prison population, it has kickstarted a process where California pays for a county-level system that grows to compensate. Some $80 million in state dollars were recently awarded to Stanislaus County for a big new jail expansion — the first project drawing from Phase II of the $1.2 billion allocated by Assembly Bill 900, the Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007.

Although an additional $44 million has flowed to a “re-entry facility” meant to help inmates with less than a year left in their sentence return to society, even left-leaning criminal justice critics have objected to the heavy costs associated with realignment. Vonya Quarles, an organizer with the All of Us or None organization, told the Modesto Bee that the Stanislaus project “is good for jobs and the builders, but the outcome of jail expansion has been nothing but failure,” underscoring the over $50,000 cost to keep an inmate in county jail for a year.

Measuring impact

In an effort to quantify the impact on crime caused by realignment, the Sentencing Project recently released the results of an investigation covering the 2006-2012 period. The study claimed that violent crime decreased by 21 percent, even while the prison population fell by 23 percent.

While proponents of realignment may be relieved to see such statistics, critics would likely point out that the six-year span of the study does not include the current spike in violent offenders released early.

6 comments

Write a comment
  1. Donkey
    Donkey 21 August, 2014, 05:43

    A corrupt “justice” system created the over crowding in our prisons, releasing those that are not murders is a good thing to do!! 🙂

    Reply this comment
    • eck
      eck 9 February, 2015, 21:12

      One can only hope one of these guys molests your wife or daughter or boosts your car. Maybe then you’ll have a different opinion.

      Reply this comment
  2. Donde
    Donde 23 August, 2014, 09:37

    Yeah. Rapists, child molesters, drug dealers and thieves never killed anybody so it’s a good thing to let them go too.

    We can tolerate crime but murderers need to be punished. Two years in prison should teach them a lesson.

    Reply this comment
  3. Robert
    Robert 27 August, 2014, 10:26

    Donkey’s statement is childishly simplistic. He basically says a victim’s only recourse for justice is posthumous.

    Reply this comment
  4. KatS
    KatS 27 October, 2014, 16:17

    The saddest part is that they have taken away a law abiding citizen’s ability to deter criminals and to protect our property and ourselves.

    Brandish a weapon as a warning to a suspicious subject/would be burglar, rapist, murderer, etc… and guess what you become… a criminal yourself!

    They even take the power out of your dog for protection. Somebody trespasses on your property or breaks into your house… your dog can’t legally defend you anymore. If it bites, no matter how small the dog or minor the injury… your dog could be taken from you, wind up euthanized, or at least you will be fined by Animal Control… and then sued by the criminal!

    Booby traps are illegal, throwing rocks or sticks, shooting anything even a slingshot, etc… you’ve broken the law and become a criminal! Especially in a city environment.

    Now we get to worry about home invasions because our neighbors have a “garden” y drug house next door… and yeah, “oh, sorry… we got the wrong address” won’t cut it when the bangs come down!

    Hmmm? …law abiding citizen… or a victim… Gee, let me think about that a minute…oops!… too late!

    Reply this comment
    • eck
      eck 9 February, 2015, 21:16

      Amen. It’s getting harder and harder to remain a tax-paying Californian every day. This state has become an insane asylum.

      Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply


Tags assigned to this article:
jailsJerry BrownprisonsrealignmentJames Poulos

Related Articles

Rep. Darrell Issa leads bipartisan push for visa reform

  With contending pieces of legislation now up for consideration in Congress, California has returned to the national spotlight on one

Mortgage lawsuit against Gov. Brown reopens old wounds

It’s a hallmark of modern-day government: Allocate money for one purpose, spend it for another. Congress isn’t the only culprit.

Maryland’s poor hammered by energy price spike — CA’s next

A point that can never be made enough about the policies of California Democrats is how much they actually hurt