CA Legislature sends Brown microbead ban

MicrobeadsAfter a roller coaster ride through the Senate, a bill enacting the nation’s toughest ban on so-called “microbeads” headed to Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk for signature.

Doubts overcome

After sailing through the Assembly in May, AB888, introduced by Richard Bloom, D-Santa Monica, languished in Sacramento’s upper chamber. As the Sacramento Bee reported, “it was blocked by a vote of 19-16 in the Senate, where a similar bill died last year.”

Although granted reconsideration, the bill was dogged by the abstention of some Democrats leery of going too far and too fast toward the elimination of the popular cosmetic and hygienic additives. Suggesting the scope of the uncertainty, state Sen. Richard Pan, D-Sacramento — co-author of the state’s recent closure of vaccination exemptions — withheld his vote, arguing that technology should be given a chance to lower the risk posed by the beads to the environment, according to the Bee.

Sure enough, tweaking the bill’s allowance for microbes alternatives won enough support to put it over the top. Originally, Bloom’s language required “that only natural products, such as ground walnut shells, could be used as alternatives to microbeads,” as the Huffington Post noted. “When proponents of the bill agreed to remove those provisions, the legislation was granted reconsideration and passed in the Senate the following day.”

Pushing for a trend

Bloom swiftly hailed the bill’s passage by a 24-14 vote. In terms now becoming typical of legislation passed in Sacramento, he framed the regulations as a model the rest of the country was ready to embrace. “California is a national leader on environmental issues. It is my hope that this legislation, which will create the strongest protections in the country, will be used as a nationwide standard for eliminating harmful micro-plastics from personal care products,” he said, according to the Santa Monica Mirror. “We cannot afford to wait any longer to stop this pervasive source of plastic pollution.”

Key environmental groups echoed Bloom’s predictions. In a blog post, the 5 Gyres Institute, a co-sponsor of the bill, pointedly referenced a pending bill in Congress. “Since CA is by far the largest market for consumer care products in the country, it is likely that Federal Legislation currently under consideration (H.R. 1312) will follow the CA model,” 5 Gyres said.

“Unlike bans in states like Colorado, Maine, New Jersey, Illinois and Indiana, AB888 bans all types of plastic microbeads, including so called “biodegradable plastics,” many of which do not biodegrade in the marine environment. The bill will encourage companies to shift towards more sustainable, naturally derived alternatives like sea salt, apricot pits and walnut husks. AB888 would ban the sale of products containing plastic microbead by 2020.”

Compound fears

Activists have long complained of microbeads’ quiet, cumulative impact, which falls disproportionately on the coastal ecosystem especially beloved of Santa Monica’s environmentalist constituents. As Mother Jones observed, “the particles are so small that they aren’t caught in wastewater treatment plants and end up in waterways and oceans, where they don’t biodegrade and are frequently mistaken for food by fish and other marine animals. There are an estimated 300,000 microbeads in a single tube of face wash.”

At the same time, opposition to microbeads arose from Californians with more of a culinary interest in marine life. “Fish species that humans harvest have been known to eat micro-plastic particles and the toxins absorbed in those plastics transfer to the fish tissue,” the Mirror noted. “Humans eat fish and bivalves that have eaten microplastics which carry known dangerous toxins.” Bloom and others have also expressed concerns that microbeads can “pose a threat to humans when used in toiletries such as toothpaste, potentially sticking in gums and causing disease.”


Write a comment
  1. Just Another Disgruntled Citizen
    Just Another Disgruntled Citizen 14 September, 2015, 10:50

    Of course, I haven’t read this bill, so I don’t know if it has something stupid in it. But, if it is straightforward, then I hope Governor Brown signs it.
    I can’t think what argument there can be in favor of plastic microbeads in cosmetics, landfills, water, the ocean, seafood or humans. They not only have no nutritional value, they are toxic.
    Economic Liberty does not confer on commerce a right to cause harm to the people, because Liberty is not freedom from any kind of control. And, as Adam Smith said in 1776 in his landmark Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, it is government’s duty to regulate commerce only for the protection of the consumer (i.a.: the public).
    Microbeads are one of those things that are not an advancement of civilization.
    Sometimes our legislators get it right.

    Reply this comment
  2. Ted
    Ted 14 September, 2015, 11:03

    Doomers LOVE plastic!

    Reply this comment
  3. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 14 September, 2015, 17:18

    Liberal demacrat’s brains are so small you need a microscope to find them

    Reply this comment
  4. desmond
    desmond 14 September, 2015, 18:40

    I feel better with nukes in the hands of wacky Islamic terroists. Can t wait to hike down Van Ness in the post nuke war world wearing a No Microbeads sign. Finally will be able to afford a home in SF.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Fresno taxpayers submit signatures for water rate referendum

A group of Fresno taxpayers, who’ve been thwarted at every turn by city leaders, is expected today to submit thousands

Calderons indicted in massive bribery, fraud case

  State Sen. Ron Calderon and his brother Thomas, a former assemblyman, were indicted late Thursday in a massive bribery

Video: 2016 Showdown: Scott Walker vs. Jeb Bush Editor-in-Chief Brian Calle recently interviewed Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. This is Part 6, on Walker vs. former Florida Gov. Jeb