Lawmakers counter ballot proposal with watered down transparency measures

transparencyLawmakers will consider two transparency bills on Wednesday in an effort to head off a ballot measure that would go to greater lengths.

The Constitutional Legislative Transparency Act, backed by Republican donor Charles T. Munger, Jr., is a constitutional amendment requiring the Legislature make available online the final version of a bill at least 72 hours prior to a vote on either the Assembly or Senate floor. The Legislature-introduced versions, however, would make this apply to only votes in the second house.

The CLTA would also require all open legislative meetings be recorded with the videos posted online within 24 hours, while the Legislature-introduced versions only require it be done “promptly.”

Another provision of the Munger-backed measure gives permission to individuals to record and share their own videos of open meetings, while the Legislature-introduced versions do not.

“Unfortunately the current legislative proposal is not palatable, though we continue to work with the Legislature in hopes we can agree on a reform that takes transparency forward, not backward, from what’s already headed for the November ballot,” said Josh Rosa, a spokesman for the measure’s committee, Hold Politicians Accountable. 

State law requires lawmakers to hold informational hearings on voter-supported initiatives.

3 comments

Write a comment
  1. Mike
    Mike 14 June, 2016, 20:07

    Off subject, me and wife just talked. She is a union Democrat, and she asked the question, why are there so many mass shootings since Obama became President? What is he doing or not doing?
    Appreciate any answers? Blaming on Bush and Republicans does not do it. Can t be Trump, he has not been a political figure for most of Obama terms. My wife is a Teamster, so BS likes Josh Earnest don t fly. She says she would make him lickclean her ass, after dropping a bowl load to get him to stop.

    Reply this comment
  2. eck
    eck 14 June, 2016, 20:33

    Transparency is an anathema to progressives (the CA democrats, no?). They think they’re the elite and know they’re right and the “peons” (us) don’t know squat. So don’t let them know – they might get the “wrong ideas”. Pathetic.

    Reply this comment
  3. bob
    bob 15 June, 2016, 13:18

    Politicians think they know what’s best for everyone so they feel they have no need for transparency.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Special contracts allow ‘full-time’ teachers to work for both union and district

It’s been called “ghost teaching,” and it thrives in California. Full-time teachers are paid six-figure salaries to work for their

Brown debuts big budget revision

Gov. Jerry Brown has unveiled the highly-anticipated revision to his annual state budget, teeing up final spending negotiations in Sacramento

Recall Gov. Jerry Brown

John Seiler: Let me be the first to say it: Recall Gov. Jerry Brown. As I’ve been predicting since last