Oakland housing crisis: Plenty of blame to go around

From the Mexican border to the Bay Area, local governments along the California coast fret about short-term rental operations such as Airbnb eating up already limited housing stock. In response, homeowners who use such rentals to deal with the high cost of living fire back with claims that they’re being scapegoated for local officials’ ineffective response to the Golden State’s affordable housing crisis.

In Oakland, these arguments keep growing more intense as tech workers keep moving in. Uber’s plan to build a new headquarters in the city by 2018 only adds to city leaders’ concerns about housing costs.

But recent reports and surveys leave little doubt that in Oakland, both short-term renters and local officials bear responsibility for severe housing headaches.

At a recent city workshop on housing issues, officials said that only 333 of the 2,252 Oakland listings on such websites as Airbnb and VRBO — less than 15 percent — were available for long-term housing. The rest are only for short-term rentals.

With Oakland apartment vacancies running at 2 percent, it’s difficult to challenge the contention that the Airbnb effect is reducing availability and helping push long-term rental costs up.

A report by two groups which advocate for low-income residents —  Community Economics Inc. and East Bay Housing Organizations — showed that Oakland Airbnb listings had soared by 50 percent in the year ending in May 2016. This trend is accelerating, according to some activists, and is a contributing factor both to Oakland emerging as one of the costliest cities for housing in the U.S. and to a surge in homelessness. Zillow reports that in the five years ending in December, Oakland had the highest percentage increase in rent of any city in the nation.

But the deaths of 36 people in a December fire at an Oakland warehouse known as the “Ghost Ship” brought national attention to the city’s and the region’s hostility to adding housing stock. A Forbes analysis noted that from 2010 to 2015, while the greater San Francisco metropolitan area had added a half-million residents, only 100,000 new housing units were built, about half what was needed.

City plan would add 600 units — over 1o years

The problem is particularly acute in Oakland. From January 2013 to January 2016, the city only issued 1,332 permits to build new housing, the San Francisco Chronicle reported — fewer than far smaller cities such as Sunnyvale, Brentwood and Redwood City. Forbes depicted this as being driven by the “demonizing” of both developers and newcomers. The new housing wasn’t remotely enough to accommodate the 28,000-plus residents Oakland has added to the 390,000 it had in the 2010 census. In June 2014, a San Francisco Business Times article noted that at a time when the Oakland housing market was hot, there was not a single significant housing project being built in the city.

Mayor Libby Schaaf’s and the City Council’s most direct response to Oakland’s housing crisis came last March, when they approved new policies on fees that were intended to clear the way for construction of relatively inexpensive housing. But attempts to depict this as a major step forward were deflated by the city administrator’s office, which estimated the changes would only yield about 600 new housing units over the next decade.


Write a comment
  1. Richard Rider
    Richard Rider 23 January, 2017, 16:02

    When it comes to housing prices, it’s really quite simple: When government restricts housing supply (via zoning and expensive regulation) plus tacks on big costs to any housing built, an inadequate amount of housing is constructed. Consider:

    The vaunted post-recession “housing building boom” in California is fizzling out. Here’s a sobering graphic.


    More permits for single-family homes have been issued in Houston than in the entire state of California both:
    a) 2016 through March (9,184 in Houston vs. 9,081 in California)
    b) from 2011 through March 2015 (133,462 vs. 132,915).

    Related: The one-way rental rate for a 26-foot U-Haul truck from Los Angeles, CA to Houston, TX in mid-May is $2,371, which is about 3 times the $806 rental rate going in the opposite direction from Houston to LA.

    Reply this comment
  2. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 24 January, 2017, 13:39

    always leave it to the liberals to open the borders without consitering where to house them all

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

New Legislation Impacts ‘Unborn’

Katy Grimes: California’s liberal politicians have been raging publibly for the last several weeks because the head of the Department of

Sacto To Pawn Parking For Arena

 Katy Grimes:  Would you pawn a $5,000 Rolex for $150? While only someone desperate for quick cash would do something

Obamacare already gutting CA jobs

April 20, 2013 By John Seiler Obamacare officially is called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. But how can