Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!
At their convention this weekend in L.A., instead of backing Jerry Brown for governor (again), maybe instead Democrats should back Jerry Springer. That would get his trashy shows off the air during the time when children watch, and Springer, a former mayor of Cincinnati, would be a better governor.
Democrats are worried that Brown’s former lead in the polls against gazillionaire Meg Whitman has eroded to zero, after she blew $59 million telling people she’s a nice person who will solve all their problems and isn’t Steve Poizner. Republicans honchos seem united behind her, if only so their consultants can cash in on some of her moolah. At the March 20 conference CalWatchDog.com held in Newport Beach, Hugh Hewett, the talk-show celebrity and lawyer, insisted that his fellow Republicans must back her.
It won’t be that easy for Meg, despite her billions of semolians. She might not appeal to grassroots Republican and nonpartisan voters.
Jerry, despite his Moonbeam reputation, also is a savvy, experienced politician. This will be his seventh statewide campaign: his father, Pat’s, three gubernatorial campaigns; sister Kathleen’s 1994 run for governor; Jerry’s losing 1982 U.S. senate campaign; and Jerry’s own two gubernatorial campaigns in the 1970s.
The state also keeps becoming more Democratic. White Republicans keep moving to other states, while immigrants from foreign lands keep coming here, and when they become citizens, keep voting about 70 percent Democratic. In the 2008 president election, Democrat Obama beat John McCain by more than 3 million votes in California, a heavy hurdle even for a dot-com executive.
Mid-term elections bring out more Republicans and fewer Democrats. And voter frustration, high this year, is taken out on the incumbent presidential party, the Democrats this year because of Obama. But I expect that Jerry will remind Californians that the sitting California governor is a Republican. Arnold, whom GOP bigshots backed strongly and fawned over because of his movie-star status, now is an albatross hanging around the party’s neck, including the Meg campaign. Jerry’s campaign is sure to say, “Do you want another rich Republican celebrity to mess up the state even more?”
I’m going to enjoy this election even though, if I can overcome my disgust and vote at all, it will be for a third-party candidate. But in a sense, it doesn’t really matter who wins. After the election, the New York bond houses will take the new governor-elect, and the Democratic and Republican leaders of the Legislature, into a room paneled with fine wood and say, “Congrats on your election. But show us the money to repay your bonds. You have to cut spending 20 percent more. And sell state property. You don’t have any choice. If you don’t pay, we’ll cut your bond rating to junk status, and destroy you.”
So, the cuts will come no matter what.
— John Seiler
Related Articles
S.F. cops shut down girl's lemonade stand
John Seiler: Just when you thought the Police State couldn’t get any worse, cops in San Francisco recently shut down a
Field’s upbeat Prop. 30 poll at odds with insiders’ assumptions
Nov. 1, 2012 By Chris Reed Has the fog that’s settled over national polling because of the gap between Nate
Referendums on passed legislation gain steam
Referendums on legislative actions may be making a comeback in California. Earlier this week, opponents of Senate Bill 277, the