California Was Impervious To Change

This article was first published in City Journal.

NOV. 4, 2010


No state is in a bigger fiscal jam than California, with its structural budget deficit and massive unfunded liabilities for well-compensated public employees. The state’s business climate is atrocious, and unemployment has topped 12 percent. Yet California voters on Tuesday not only sidestepped the national backlash against liberal Democratic policies; they declared that they want more of them.

The voters resurrected the career of their 1970s-era governor, Jerry Brown—well known for his “small is beautiful” policies, which squelched infrastructure growth in what was then a rapidly growing state, and for his support for collective bargaining rights for public-employee unions, which paved the way for many of the state’s fiscal problems today. Those unions bankrolled his campaign for governor this time around. Brown even declared during a debate with rival Meg Whitman that “everything is on the table,” meaning that he would consider fiddling with Proposition 13, which limits property taxes and has been the third rail of California politics. Brown insists that he won’t support tax increases without a referendum, which at least offers a preview of what’s coming.

A cast of liberal Democratic candidates in California managed to survive the nationwide Republican onslaught. Senator Barbara Boxer won reelection. San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom, who brazenly defied state law on gay marriages and who fought against pension reform in his city, won overwhelmingly in his race for lieutenant governor. Conservatives helped his cause by supporting a write-in candidate in order to deny the post to tax-raising liberal Republican Abel Maldonado. Bill Lockyer won reelection as state treasurer, despite stating recently at a Milken Institute forum that there was no pension crisis and offering this take on the state’s $300 billion–plus unfunded pension liability: “There is a point in having decent pensions in both public and private life and instead of attacking and victimizing people let’s talk about the inadequate pensions in the private sector and figuring out how to fix that problem.” Democrats even won a few state assembly seats that should have gone to Republicans in an ordinary year, let alone during a Republican wave.

Californians are accustomed to hobbling along with political leadership that sees government as the first answer to everything. But Tuesday’s most disturbing results were on ballot initiatives. Yes, voters rejected a state-parks tax proposal and refused to undermine legislative redistricting, but they supported Proposition 25, which lowers the state’s two-thirds vote requirement for passing budgets. This will push Republicans in the legislature further to the margins, and the dominant Democrats will have additional tools at their disposal to raise taxes early and often. While there’s considerable debate over whether Prop. 25 will allow certain tax increases with a simple majority, there’s no question that the unions and Democratic leadership in Sacramento are celebrating the passage of this destructive measure.

Voters also approved the noxious Proposition 22, which carves out a portion of the state budget for eminent-domain-abusing redevelopment agencies. And they handily rejected Proposition 23, which would have suspended the state’s global-warming law until unemployment came down to a more reasonable level. Some of us had great hope that Proposition B, which would impose modest reforms on San Francisco’s pension and health-care systems for retired employees, would win passage. It was sponsored by the city’s public defender, Jeff Adachi, a progressive who argued that pension reform was necessary to stave off cuts to other city programs. It went down to overwhelming defeat.

California is said to be a national trendsetter, but Tuesday night, it lagged behind the rest of the country. The state continues to move toward the financial precipice. It’s becoming more likely that California is, as former state librarian Kevin Starr put it, a “failed state.” For this, Golden State voters have no one to blame but themselves. I can only take comfort in H. L. Mencken’s words: “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.”

No comments

Write a comment
  1. S. Perry
    S. Perry 4 November, 2010, 12:54

    Brown has another opportunity now to make sure that infrastructure is adequately funded, beginning with high-speed rail.

    Reply this comment
  2. Honest Abe
    Honest Abe 4 November, 2010, 22:40

    SF city workers already agreed to pay their own fair share of retirement contributions in full and on schedule July 1,2011. The “big savings” hoped for in this poorly thought out piece of written scapegoating and bullying came from the “healthcare” component.
    Wealthy authors, greedy bankroller venture capitalist and billionaire backers of this divisive proposition sought to use HEALTHCARE CUTS to boost their “savings” figure which they shamelessly touted knowing full well that such drastic cuts would displace the most vulnerable, namely children and retirees who cannot otherwise afford PREVENTIVE healthcare.
    SF voters recognized that cuts to PREVENTIVE healthcare would cost tax payers double, triple and quadruple when REACTIVE healthcare like urgent care and emergency room services at the medical industry’s skyrocketing rates and exorbitant costs and fees would be the only remaining options for many unable to afford or qualify for reasonably priced medical coverage -by voting NO on B

    Reply this comment
  3. Paul Taylor Examiner
    Paul Taylor Examiner 5 November, 2010, 08:19

    The clear message from the national midterm elections is that President Obama’s progressive policies have not worked for economic recovery, and his other risky domestic initiatives are widely unpopular. This midterm election also shows California, and Obama, to be out of step with the American political mood.

    California, generally seen as forward leaning politically, has voted to move in reverse — back to the government-growing, tax-and-spend liberalism that has brought us 12.5% unemployment, job-killing environmental and business regulations, and ubiquitous taxes. Except for rejecting marijuana legalization, the other approved ballot initiatives blindly perpetuate the militant immigrant, labor union and environmental special interests that have crushed California prosperity for the foreseeable future.

    What this election should have been for California is a therapeutic intervention to change its addiction to big government. Sadly, the election results will read like an obituary of failed progressive political policies and has beens. The national political trajectory is changed with this election; and it will leave California behind as a failed state.

    California has wiped out on the conservative wave election. This confirms California’s status as a failed state under the oppression of militant immigrant, labor and green special interests. The once “Golden State” is broke and broken.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Election losers still win big

Dec. 3, 2012 Katy Grimes: The chief strategist for Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign has finally spoken out about what happened.

CA sheriffs sue on L.A. gun magazine law

With gun rights and regulations emerging as a hot-button issue in California politics, the city of Los Angeles has provoked

CA GOP labors to read Latino tea leaves

Though the political ground has been shifting in California, new research is giving Republicans only hints about how to woo Latino voters. Much