CA GOP Saves Eminent Domain!


MARCH 18, 2011


California Republicans love to talk about limiting government, fighting bureaucracy and keeping taxes low, but on Thursday they proved that this is nothing more than a rhetorical device. Given the opportunity to rein in the size and power of government in a tangible way, Assembly Republicans – with one sole exception – punted. They rallied to save some of the most abusive and wastrel government agencies around.

As the California GOP begins its convention in Sacramento today, party members ought to at least understand where its Assembly members stand – on the side of big government, higher taxes and uncontrolled debt and against property rights, individualism and freedom. As the party blathers about luring minority and working-class voters, let it be clear that the GOP sided with the developers and government planners who want to drive minorities and working-class people off of their property. The Democrats are right: The GOP is the party of big business and privilege.

As part of the governor’s budget package, the Assembly voted on SB77, which would have ended the state’s redevelopment agencies. But only longtime redevelopment foe, Chris Norby of Fullerton, sided with taxpayers and property owners. The rest of the Assembly Republicans voted “no” or didn’t vote at all. Had even one of the Republicans joined Norby, the bill would have passed with a two-thirds majority. There may still be time, but the GOP is too busy celebrating that it stopped Brown on this one issue. They put partisanship above their own ideology. They stopped Brown in one of the few areas where Brown was right.

Redevelopment was started in 1945 as a means to upgrade decrepit urban areas, but in the ensuing years the state’s now-nearly 400 active redevelopment agencies have become horrific abusers of eminent domain. They routinely take private property from homeowners and small business owners and give it to developers on the cheap. Redevelopment has become a “tool” by which government agencies grab more tax revenues. They subsidize big-box stores and auto malls — it’s about luring sales taxes, not about upgrading blighted areas. Government officials don’t care whose rights they erode in the process of gaining more money for government.

Gov. Jerry Brown has targeted the agencies because they divert 12 percent of the state’s property taxes from traditional public services (schools, police, parks and firefighting) to corporate welfare. He figures the state can save about $1.7 billion annually as he seeks to close a gaping $26.6 billion budget hole. This should have been a no-brainer with any Republican with a brain. They proved themselves to be the party of numbskulls.

Redevelopment is about everything Republicans claim to loath: bureaucracy, debt, abuses of property rights, big government, excessive land-use rules, subsidized housing and fiscal irresponsibility. In California cities, redevelopment bureaucrats rule the roost and they leave a path of destruction wherever they go. They bully people and impose enormous burdens on taxpayers. The diversion of tax dollars to welfare queens mandates higher taxes, but the GOP sided with the redevelopment industry. They sided with agencies that run up hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer-backed indebtedness. They sided with government-directed stimulus programs, albeit local ones rather than federal ones.

Some, like Martin Garrick and Nathan Fletcher, sided with redevelopment because of their eagerness to get a taxpayer-subsidized stadium deal in San Diego. Others, such as Bob Huff, have always been closely allied with the City of Industry and other powerful redevelopment players. Most Republicans offered lame excuses. For instance, they argued that if redevelopment agencies were shut down, something new and equally bad would take its place. That’s an absurd argument. They might as well oppose tax cuts by arguing that the government will find other ways to raise the revenue.

The truth is California Republicans do not believe in limited government. They do not stand up for property owners. They are the party of corporate welfare. They oppose higher taxes, but that’s the only guiding principle of the party these days. And even that is suspect. Many Assembly Republicans, such as the pro-union members of the “no more cuts” caucus (Jim Silva, Brian Nestande and Paul Cook), vote in a way that virtually mandates higher taxes at some point. Then they get on their high horse and sign those bogus tax-fighting pledges. And you wonder why the GOP is fading away in this state?

If the GOP could not provide more than one vote to end redevelopment, then we know that their claims about pension reform and spending caps are bogus too. They will never provide the margin of victory on these matters, either. When push comes to shove, they will be bought off again and will offer similar excuses for why they really support reform but just couldn’t vote for it this time. Yet Republicans wonder why they have been relegated to irrelevancy, the laughingstocks of the California political world. Sure, they usually are better than Democrats, but they offer no cohesive and believable alternative to the Party of Unions.

Certainly, Republicans continue to hold firm against the governor’s proposed tax-extension vote, but I’m guessing we’ll get that vote eventually. For instance, the state’s unprincipled business community, led by the Democrat-friendly California Chamber of Commerce, is promising to support those Republicans who go soft on taxes. The Chamber just wants business-as-usual, and is perfectly happy if legislators tax the rest of us more – as long as its members’ special privileges are protected. That’s no way to build a broader movement.

The Chamber loves redevelopment also and redevelopment is a core issue. Anyone who supports it cannot claim to be a conservative, not if the term conservative has any meaning. It is the epitome of bad public policy, in that it gives governmental powers to the most powerful and politically well-connected players at the expense of the average citizen.

Ironically, the Democrats claimed to love redevelopment, but voted to end the agencies as a way to save money. Republicans often criticized the redevelopment process, but then rallied the troops to save it. Some Assembly Republicans even embraced a fiscally outrageous plan floated by the City of Industry to extend the life of redevelopment agencies and float more debt. Industry lobbyists were reportedly seen basking in their victory around the Capitol.

So Assembly Republicans are clear: They love Obama-style stimulus programs and corporate welfare. They trust planners and bureaucrats rather than the free market. They support higher taxes and more debt. And they believe that the government should be free to use eminent domain to take property from private owners and give that property to powerful private interests.

Let’s at least dispense with all the rhetoric. The party that saved eminent domain is no friend of the California taxpayer.


Write a comment
  1. Curtis Walker
    Curtis Walker 18 March, 2011, 20:20

    Thanks for a great, educational piece. Will link to it on my site and recommend it to others to do the same.

    Reply this comment
  2. Chris Bieber
    Chris Bieber 18 March, 2011, 21:25

    yet/still/again…you hit it(the fascism and elitism of the GOP) on the head ….exposing the rank and fetid hypocricy and arrogance of the “conservative” GOP team up there…

    Thanks for your sterling work up in the MiniPlenty of Sacramento.

    Wish you were still down here…keep up the good work….and thanks for it.


    Reply this comment
  3. Fred Smoller
    Fred Smoller 19 March, 2011, 00:41


    Reply this comment
  4. Bill Clemente
    Bill Clemente 19 March, 2011, 05:12

    Great job again… most citizens only become aware of issues when they hiy the front page… rarely does the masses keep their finger on the pulse at the local level… Thank you “Halfway to Concord” for being one of my watch dogs.

    Reply this comment
  5. Lloyd Guccione
    Lloyd Guccione 19 March, 2011, 06:10

    Dear Mr. Greenhut,
    Among the many points, obervations, and perspectives that you gave in your March 18, 2011 ‘Commentary’ there is one line in paragraph 11 which really caught my attention; it says it all. The sentence is; “It is the epitome of bad public policy, in that it gives governmental powers to the most powerful and politically well-connected players at the expense of the average citizen.” How true. And how does this come about? Because those who have money and power have the ‘tools’ necessary, in our current up-side-down democracy, to lord it over those of us of more modest expectations in life; they lord it over the poor, the working stiff, the young, the aged. They have become blinded by the brilliance of their coins and their swords.

    Reply this comment
  6. EastBayLarry
    EastBayLarry 19 March, 2011, 07:11

    There is no conservative aspect to the California GOP. They are beyond ‘dem-lite’ and have gone to ‘liberal-in-GOP-clothing’.

    Reply this comment
  7. Skep41
    Skep41 19 March, 2011, 07:54

    The contemptible Republiclowns strike again. But dont worry, when the state keels over and declares bankruptcy all the redevelopers will go down with the ship. With our pols so phenomenally stupid the day of reckoning cant be far off. The question remains, with voters stupid enough to elect this pack of miscreants what chance do we have to recover?

    Reply this comment
  8. David from Oceanside
    David from Oceanside 19 March, 2011, 09:51

    I gave up on the Republicans in 1982. You should too, its great to have no association with this crowd.

    Reply this comment
  9. EastBayLarry
    EastBayLarry 19 March, 2011, 20:27

    Well David from Oceanside, does that mean you are a democrat? Are you with some third party? Are you totally apolitical and just come here to make fun of the people who care enough to get involved?

    If the state and/or the country fail, it will mainly be because people like Dave wanted to disassociate themselves from the responsibility of a government of We The People.

    Reply this comment
    • Jeff
      Jeff 11 May, 2014, 07:23

      EastBayLarry, If you think that it’s Gov’t of we the people you are so wrong. It’s a Gov’t of we the money, Period, and if you are part of We the Money then you are also part of the problem. It’s no longer a Gov’t of We the People and hasn’t been for a long time. There is too much money being thrown at representatives for them to vote for the people. Until Lobbyists are thrown out of all levels of Gov’t it won’t change. Just because a person doesn’t claim one party or the other doesn’t really mean anything.

      Reply this comment
  10. Bob
    Bob 20 March, 2011, 19:23

    Supporting the two bills to end Redevelopment would not in any way put the CA Republicans in jeopardy of supporting tax-extensions/increases.

    Therefore, Mr. Greenhut is 100% correct in his analysis that the CA GOP has become the party that supports Kelo-type, non-Public uses of Eminent Domain.

    The CA GOP has also become the party of supporting deficits through Redevelopment bonds which are done without voter approval. In 2009, Redevelopment debt totaled $94 Billion.

    Many involved in trying to reform and cure Redevelopment issues such as Kelo-Eminent domain would not have dreamed of having a Democratic Governor propose the entire elimination and Republicans holding this at bay.

    Reply this comment
  11. JoeS
    JoeS 20 March, 2011, 20:59

    Great article.

    Remind these politicians that Right is Right. Stealing is wrong.

    Redevelopment is using the force of government to steal.

    Reply this comment
  12. Fred Sottile
    Fred Sottile 24 March, 2011, 15:19

    When will you partisan writers stop the shill job of writing articles like this and get down to the truth. We will not have a government of the people until we VOTE OUT every single politician in place today. Only then can we begin to get the attention of the very people we put in place to work for us. Our continued refusal to do this gives us the abusive government we deserve. Vote the Bums out or be ruled by them.

    Reply this comment
  13. Steven Greenhut
    Steven Greenhut 25 March, 2011, 13:59

    How does this article make me partisan, Fred? I am usually considered a conservative, and I am blasting the Republican Party and supporting the Democratic position here. This is the opposite of partisanship — I am criticizing my “own” side because it is violating a set of principles that I hold. Partisanship means supporting one’s party no matter what. Your argument is nonsensical as is your political prescription.

    Reply this comment
  14. Hcat
    Hcat 30 March, 2011, 10:41

    If we throw the bums out, we the people being who we are, and especially the kind of people that are more likely to present themselves for political office, we will just get new bums.

    Reply this comment
  15. Susan
    Susan 23 April, 2011, 14:14

    While all that may be true here’s all I know. My husband is in the Construction Industry. He is 54. RDA work is all his company has been able to get. No residential housing is hardly being built. No RDA work, no job, no house, no food, no clothes. Where is a broke 54 year old going to start over? The Construction Industry has already been decimated this will wipe it out almost completely. My husband says non union wages are back to 1970s levels. Who can live on that.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

20th anniversary of Waco raid

Feb. 28, 2013 By John Seiler If you think government “protects” you, remember what happened 20 years ago today: The

Asm. Lorena Gonzalez proposes labor protections for cheerleaders

Legislative committee hearings aren’t known for their heart-pounding excitement. But, you might hear a round of cheers to excite the