Lawmakers seek probe of CA refineries

Nov. 30, 2012

By Joseph Perkins

Taking time out from negotiations over the fiscal cliff, a half-dozen U.S. senators asked the Justice Department this week to investigate whether “market manipulation” by California oil refineries led to the run up in gasoline prices the Golden State’s motorists suffered in both May and October.

The lawmakers, led by California Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, suggest that “false reporting” by refineries, including Chevron, Valero Energy and Tesoro, “created a perception of a supply shortage when in fact refineries were still producing.” In their letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, they urge a “refinery-by-refinery probe.”

The lawmakers are disingenuous. They attribute California’s all-too-frequent gasoline price spikes to predatory pricing by evil oil companies, while completely ignoring laws enacted by the state Legislature, rules enforced by state regulatory agencies, that have given California the most expensive gasoline on the U.S. mainland, almost guaranteeing occasional price spikes.

Indeed, even the “independent” energy consultant retained by Sens. Feinstein, Cantwell, et al. to “examine the oil industry on the West Coast,” acknowledges the uniqueness of the Golden State’s gasoline market.

“The West Coast is an ‘island’ in the North American gasoline market because there is no gasoline pipeline across the Rockies,” wrote Robert McCullough, in a report this month. “Within this island,” he added, “California is an even smaller island, since California law mandates a specific formulation for gasoline during spring and summer months.”

So California oil refineries need not artificially limit the state gasoline supply to drive up pump prices. They need not manipulate the market at the expense of California motorists. The regulators in Sacramento already have done that for them.

Fewer refineries

Indeed, over the past three decades, California’s population has nearly doubled, yet the state has not allowed any new refineries to be built. In fact, at least 10 California refineries have permanently shut down over the span, reducing the state’s overall refining capacity 20 percent.

California’s 20 remaining refineries have to produce at near maximum capacity to meet the gasoline demand of California motorists. And when even one refinery shuts down unexpectedly, it creates an immediate gasoline shortage, which leads to the run up in pump prices to which Sen. Feinstein and her colleagues attribute to market manipulation.

But there was no market manipulation when a massive fire broke out this past August at Chevron’s 245,000 barrel-a-day Richmond oil refinery.

Nor when Chevron in September shut down its KLM pipeline, which carries up to 85,000 barrels of crude each day crude oil from the Central Valley to Bay Area refineries, due to the presence of elevated organic chloride levels in the crude stream.

Nor when ExxonMobil was forced to reduce production by 65,000 barrels a day at its Torrance refinery last month after a problem at a Southern California Edison substation caused a power outage at the refinery.

Instead of siccing the Justice Department’s prosecutorial hounds on California’s refineries,  Feinstein and her Senate colleagues would better serve the interests of California motorists by taking a hard look at both state and federal regulations that have done much to make the West Coast an island in North America’s gasoline market, and the Golden State an even smaller fuel island.

The only problem with California’s refineries is that there aren’t enough of them.

 

6 comments

Write a comment
  1. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 30 November, 2012, 16:36

    Another “probe”, “investigation”…I have seen 15 or more of these going back 35 years, nothing will happen, just like the other 15 when nothing happened.

    We have 4 major oil companies who are gaming the system in an oligarchy, that is the problem, when Standard Oil was busted in 1910 it was split in 34 different companies- do the math of then vs now.

    Reply this comment
  2. Tax Target
    Tax Target 1 December, 2012, 07:56

    What else can we expect from dumbest of the dumb Senators from Kalifornsky. These two babes don’t have a neuron between them. I look forward to these morons leading us off the apocalyptic cliff.

    Reply this comment
  3. Ted Steele, Janitor
    Ted Steele, Janitor 1 December, 2012, 16:17

    LOL

    Rex the super Poodle

    an opinion about EVERYthing! Like an old woman! Oh—gee——sorry——-maybe the Poodle IS an older woman……my bad…..sorry maam.

    Reply this comment
  4. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 1 December, 2012, 21:10

    Teddy, stop spamming the board…..

    Reply this comment
  5. dltravers
    dltravers 2 December, 2012, 20:58

    When the Cheveron fired happened the other refinery postponed planned maintenance outages for as long as they could. As the planned outages were set back they continued to produce fuel at lower rates because they couldn’t produce higher rates until after the maintenace occured.

    Reactor catalysts need to be replaced, leaking pumps need to be taken out of service, old pipes need replacing and more. Just wait till two more refining companies leave Foolafornia in the next few years.

    You aint seen nothing yet…

    Reply this comment
  6. BobA
    BobA 3 December, 2012, 08:00

    This is a totally disingenuous by Boxer and Feinstein. They already know why gas prices are so high in California and they also know that Californians are so ignorant and stupid that they’ll buy this so-called “investigation” as if it’s going to make a damn bit of difference in the price and availability of gasoline. It won’t but don’t tell the ignoramuses in California that.

    What the point in complaining about high taxes, high gas prices, rising food costs, high crime rates, etc., etc. when we keep voting for the very same politicians who are responsible for the problems to begin with? We deserve the politicians we vote for and all the negative consequences they wrought upon us.

    Boxer and Feinstein’s investigation will amount to nothing more than a fat paycheck, courtesy of the US tax payers, for a few consulting firms (aka, lobbyists) from which a percentage of the payout will make its way back into Boxer and Feinstein’s campaign coffers.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Government incompetence behind Bay Bridge fiasco

July 9, 2013 By Chris Reed The latest revelations about the Bay Bridge’s construction shortcomings point straight to incompetence as

Poizner plays Iran politics

Feb. 15, 2010 One of the best ways to evaluate the merits of any politician’s proposed new rule or power

A welcome bow to telecom deregulation

April 20, 2012 By Joseph Perkins The California Public Utilities Commission is displeased. In a meeting April 17 in San