Schools chief who tolerates bond scams wants to float own bond

Dec. 5, 2012

By Chris Reed

The use of 30-year school “construction” bonds to pay for routine maintenance and short-lived electronics like laptops is a huge, ongoing, but basically uncovered scandal in California. Since automatic annual pay raises for most teachers don’t get suspended when revenue is flat or declining, in many state school districts, California’s recent budget woes have lead to compensation eating up 90 percent or more of the operating budget.

So what do schools beholden to teachers unions do to cover costs that used to be in the operating budget? They make kids illegally pay for some school-related program, constantly pester parents with fundraising efforts and, oh yeah, use 30-year borrowing to pay for basic upkeep and electronics that aid in learning but last two years or less.

How does the state’s top educator feel about the latter practice? When I interviewed him, he all but said ho-hum.

“… state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson expressed more sympathy for the irresponsible officials who engaged in it than for the taxpayers who are brutalized by it. He cited the ‘stress’ officials faced because of the state’s budget woes and implied it was understandable and reasonable for routine maintenance becoming a ‘capital improvement’ cost paid for with bonds.

“Torlakson declined to offer the slightest criticism of the folly that is 30-year borrowing to pay for products that will be broken in four years or less. His concession to appearances: ‘I’ve asked my staff on school construction to look into this and figure out where the line is on what’s eligible.'”

And now what does Torlakson want to do? Float a possibly unaccountable bond of his own, one in the megabillions.

No, it’s not a case of, “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.” Torlakson is all for the scams. It’s more like, “Hey, I want a piece of that action!”


Write a comment
  1. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 5 December, 2012, 07:41

    Floating long term bonds- construction, CAB or any other type- to cover daily ongoing expenses- it is fiscal insanity and the beginning of the end, if not the end of the end…..and you wonder why we are so screwed up.

    Reply this comment
  2. Sean Morham
    Sean Morham 5 December, 2012, 09:52

    Torlakson is part of the educator generation, that has seen learning standards decline, less discipline, increased cost, but higher teacher/admin salaries, higher pensions. Culture and the decline of the family certainly have an effect, but facts are facts; Torlakson and his peers have sucked more out of the system for themselves while the output they are measured by: educating, has gotten worse. He is a piece of &*$#.

    Reply this comment
  3. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 5 December, 2012, 16:54

    Tom Torlakson was a dem in my county when I lived in the bay area, he is a trougher for sure

    Reply this comment
  4. SeeSaw
    SeeSaw 6 December, 2012, 11:57

    Most people who buy a home, cannot afford to have it, unless they defer paying it off for 30-40 years. Why is doing the same, via bonds, in order to provide services for the citizens, bad?

    Reply this comment
  5. Sean Morham
    Sean Morham 6 December, 2012, 14:12

    The one in San Diego was in house terminology, a loan with a balloon at the end(1 billion). As I understand it, the municipality would have to save the funds for the one billion, which includes principal and deferred(as well as comppounded interest). It would be equivalent for you to buy a house and give the loan to your kids(grandkids) for them to pay off.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

CalPERS rate hike slams cities

Californians are finding out how Gov. Jerry Brown is going to deal with the state’s pension crisis: make the taxpayers

1,400 Workers in $200,000 Club

John Seiler: How would you like to make $200,000 a year? Join the California government. State budget and deficit problems?

‘Liberal’ 9th Circuit backs government spying

June 10, 2013 By John Seiler The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is supposed to be the most liberal