Starving CA govt. begins to devour itself

Housing wealth - cagle cartoonDec. 18, 2012

By Mark Cabaniss

Caught between rising pension costs and  declining tax receipts, several local governments in California have gone bankrupt, including the city of San Bernardino, which has stopped making its required contributions to the California Public Employees Retirement System.  CalPERS is threatening to sue.

Meanwhile, the county of San Bernardino is thinking of trying to help the local economy by injecting it with billions of dollars, which, unfortunately, it doesn’t have.  So the people who run the county are thinking of simply seizing the money by using eminent domain.  But an examination of the plan reveals a simple scheme in which the right hand of government robs the left hand of government, because the idea that has been floated is simply to confiscate the money from institutional investors — and many of these institutional investors are pension funds, including government pension funds like CalPERS.

The plan came from Mortgage Resolution Partners, or MRP, of San Francisco, and it goes like this:   local governments would try to help local homeowners out of the housing crash by using eminent domain to condemn underwater mortgages, then refinance the mortgages with lower principal amounts, which would then have lower monthly payments, so local homeowners wouldn’t have to take the losses from the bursting of the property bubble.

MRP would take a $4,500 fee for each refinanced home. As there are an estimated 20,000 to 30,000 homes in San Bernardino County that would be good candidates for the plan, that would make MRP’s cut $90 to $135 million in San Bernardino County alone.  And the plan might expand elsewhere in California, even other states.

A public purpose supposedly would be served because each refinanced homeowner would suddenly have hundreds of dollars of “free money” each month to pump into the local economy.  But so far, there has been no mention of who would lose all of this free money, other than some vague references to “Wall Street.”

Robbing Peter…

At first glance, this seems like a typical government plan to rob Peter to pay Paul; to give “free money” to local residents, which money has been taken from some guy, somewhere, “out there.”  However, the proposed mechanics of the plan make it doubtful that all of the negative effects from the confiscation could be foisted off onto some nebulous, nefarious rich Wall Street types in other states.

More likely, it’s going to be robbing Peter to pay Peter — one part of government robbing another part.

A good, and even mostly sympathetic, article explaining the plan was written by Ben Hallman for the Huffington Post. When banks make a home loan, they don’t keep all the mortgages.  Many of them are sold off to other investors, in pools, to mitigate the effect of individual defaults.

These pooled mortgages that are sold off are of two types: agency debt and non-agency debt.  Agency debt refers to mortgage debt that is guaranteed by the federal government through one of its agencies, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  These government-owned home loans comprise the largest pool of underwater mortgages across the country, estimated at 3.3 million, but these loans would not be included in the MRP plan.  Instead, the plan would confiscate, through condemnation, only privately-owned, non-agency debt. Hallman explained:

“Private investors, including pension funds like California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the giant bond fund Pacific Investment Management Co., own much of the rest of the outstanding mortgage debt, which adds up to about 10 percent of all loans.

“These mortgages, though small in number, are most likely to be deeply underwater, and thus are in the most danger of failing. Privately owned loans are three times as likely as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loans to be underwater, for example. [Chief Strategy Officer John] Vlahoplus of Mortgage Resolution Partners said the eminent domain proposal is designed to target exactly these privately held mortgages that are at the highest risk of foreclosure.”

So the plan is to specifically target and seize CalPERS and other pension funds’ assets and give them away to lucky underwater homeowners — minus MRP’s cut, of course.  At bottom, this is a scheme for government to rob government pension funds, among other funds, to get the money to bail out underwater housing.

Fighting back

Some Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association members, perhaps mindful of their fiduciary duty to investors to protect the investments that are supposed to secure their retirements, began discussing ways to fight back when the confiscation plan was first floated.

But California’s irony-free Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder demanding criminal prosecution of the targeted victims, who had been talking to each other about possible responses, as having violated the antitrust laws.

Newsom hasn’t had to write a letter demanding the prosecution of anyone at CalPERS — yet.  And he hasn’t had to write a letter demanding the prosecution of anyone at the Retired Peace Officers Association of California, or the California Judges Association — yet.

But CalPERS had a dismal rate of return of only 1 percent in 2011, despite having an assumed rate of return of 7.75 percent at the time (since reduced slightly to 7.5 percent), which was used in all their calculations projecting that their fund is solvent.  And California taxpayers and California government retirees are increasingly at odds about who should pay how much for a system that is increasingly seen as wildly unsustainable.

So, a few questions: What if CalPERS does become insolvent?  And what if the taxpayers are simply too broke to bail out an insolvent CalPERS?  Against that looming backdrop, shouldn’t CalPERS’ leadership at least try to protect their fund assets from naked confiscation? Shouldn’t they say something?  A peep?

So far, CalPERS is like Sherlock Holmes’ dog that hasn’t barked, leading one to wonder whether being backstopped by the taxpayers for investment losses has anything to do with their silence, even while a looting party is forming to come after their retirees’ assets. It is probably just a question of time until the CalPERS retirees realize they are in the crosshairs of a plan to forcibly seize their retirement assets.

When that happens, and the politicians realize they have to face down retired cops and firefighters rather than faceless Wall Streeters, perhaps this ridiculous plan to use government to confiscate the private property of some people and give it to other people will be laughed off the public stage.

13 comments

Write a comment
  1. Hondo
    Hondo 18 December, 2012, 09:18

    I say let them brawl, let them fight it out. Get a ring side seat to watch the unions and the corrupt San Berdoo govt duke it out. No skin off my back.
    When are these people going to figure out that there is no ‘scheme’ that can fix the problem. The answer is extended economic growth. Sound financial management.
    Hondo….

    Reply this comment
  2. BobA
    BobA 18 December, 2012, 09:41

    Hondo:

    Amen Hondo! And I’m a municipal bond investor and there’s no way in hell I’d even buy a bond issued by the city & county of San Bernardino. Let they fry in their own fat.

    The city of Los Angeles is also in trouble but their Mayor is the darling of the democrat party so that city’s problems gets little mention in the MSM.

    You and I both know what the ultimate solution will be when all the machinations mentioned in this article exhaust themselves and goes nowhere: more taxes and higher fees! The magic elixir of all politicians who have ever skulked and prowled upon the earth.

    Reply this comment
  3. jimmydeeoc
    jimmydeeoc 18 December, 2012, 10:45

    “….but their Mayor is the darling of the democrat party….”

    The cherry on top. Here’s a man who is arguably the worst mayor in memory, who in a saner time would be banished to a dual-wide in Adelanto, but solely because of his ethnicity Dems are bruiting him for even higher office.

    So no doubt we’ll be seeing Tony’s toothy grin and empty head on TV for the next two decades.

    Reply this comment
  4. us citizen
    us citizen 18 December, 2012, 11:38

    Oh puleeese dont taunt us with more of Villagrossa…….this man is an idiot.

    Reply this comment
  5. BobA
    BobA 18 December, 2012, 12:15

    jimmydeeoc, us citizen:

    That’s what makes him the darling of the democrats. Intelligence and common sense are not prerequisites for being a democrat. Heck, you don’t even have to know how to walk and chew gum at the same time to be a democrat.

    Just look good, smile & wave and know how to blame republicans on cue. The handlers (puppet masters) will do the rest.

    Proof? Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, et al. “Quod Est Demonstradum”.

    Reply this comment
  6. us citizen
    us citizen 18 December, 2012, 12:30

    Wait!!! You forgot Reid and Feinstein…………:) They wouldn’t settle for an et al. lol

    Reply this comment
  7. The Rt Rev Ted Steele
    The Rt Rev Ted Steele 18 December, 2012, 14:06

    BobA–= Conlige suspectos semper habitos——Look it up little buddy— all you do is repeat the talking points….

    Reply this comment
  8. BobA
    BobA 18 December, 2012, 15:05

    Rev. Ted:

    Very clever but when I speak of democrats, it’s always the same brain dead democrats suspects. No point in rounding them up; we know where they are and it looks like they aren’t going anywhere either.

    Reply this comment
  9. The Rt Rev Ted Steele
    The Rt Rev Ted Steele 18 December, 2012, 18:02

    A very dull investigator “rounds up the usual suspects”. Are you a dull boy Bob?

    Reply this comment
  10. SeeSaw
    SeeSaw 18 December, 2012, 23:26

    There are as many intelligent people in this State/Country who are Democrats as there are the same who are Republicans. You lost the election BobA, because there are a lot more Democrats with common sense than there are Republicans. Get over it.

    Reply this comment
  11. Mrs. White
    Mrs. White 19 December, 2012, 08:54

    “The trades unions will be one of the agencies that will bring upon this earth a time of trouble such as has not been since the world began.” [Daniel 12:1]

    Reply this comment
  12. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 19 December, 2012, 18:00

    The Rt Rev Ted Steele says:

    BobA–= Conlige suspectos semper habitos——Look it up little buddy— all you do is repeat the talking points….
    ==

    LOL..now Teddy is a Latin language expert who lectures others on talkig points- pot meet kettle 🙂

    Reply this comment
  13. Ted Steele DD
    Ted Steele DD 19 December, 2012, 19:35

    Poor Poodle……..

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Union battles Caltrans over “inadequate” new office space, $1.7 million partitions

A public employees’ union is questioning Caltrans’ pricey decision to move one of its district offices from one side of

Confusion: Each Calif. state agency uses different accounting numbers

Aug. 20, 2012 By Wayne Lusvardi In 15th century Italy, the Medici Bank issued two sets of currency: gold Florins for

Local governments approve numerous tax increases: Part 2

This is Part 2 of a series of stories about tax increases passed throughout California in the November 5 elections.