State government will have to start subsidizing Amtrak soon

Jan. 24, 2013

By Chris Reed

Congress and most presidents have long been ridiculously tolerant of Amtrak and its never-ending need for federal aid — the equivalent of massive ongoing annual bailouts. But five years ago, lawmakers actually got a little fed up. The result was a law that required states to assume the subsidies on routes of less than 750 miles that were entirely within their boundaries, beginning in late 2013.

As the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday, this is already causing consternation in New York, Pennsylvania and other states, which expect to have to foot annual bills in the tens of millions of dollars.

Bullet Train Pic1Here in California, this should set up an entertaining subplot in the battle over high-speed rail. It is difficult to quickly determine what the state’s Amtrak tab will be in coming years. The lengthy PDF of the state transportation budget for 2013-14 does not include any line-item expenditures showing an Amtrak subsidy, but the funds could easily be buried within a larger category. Also unclear from looking at the Amtrak California website is how many routes the state will have to subsidize. Some of the most popular routes that end in Los Angeles or San Francisco actually originate thousands of miles away in other states and apparently will continue to get federal subsidies.

Nevertheless, it is obvious that California is going to need to come up with millions of dollars to take over the subsidies for interstate routes such as those linking Sacramento and the Bay Area, and Sacramento and Los Angeles. And the need for the state to heavily subsidize Amtrak’s in-state routes will underscore one of the oldest and strongest critiques offered by critics of California’s bullet-train project and rail projects in general: They will never break even or make money because just about no train in the U.S. breaks even or makes money.

This will be a useful reminder — one more warning that the bullet train will never be a cash cow, whatever the grandiose promises made for Proposition 1A in 2008 or made now by Gov. Jerry Brown.

I would have put that it was a “powerful reminder,” but then I remembered this insane L.A. Times editorial.

For some people, belief in the bullet train has a quasi-religious vibe. Unfortunately for Californians and for rationality in general, that includes the editorialists of the state’s largest and most powerful newspaper.

2 comments

Write a comment
  1. Ian M. P. Hake
    Ian M. P. Hake 24 January, 2013, 09:34

    This is a thoughtful piece. We ought to stop subsidizing the “free”ways too. In fact, all transportation infrastructure in California should be pay to play. When the hell is the 405 going to break even? NEVER! Let’s get rid of this boondoggle.

    Reply this comment
  2. us citizen
    us citizen 24 January, 2013, 12:52

    Hey, you can sit on the 405 and have lunch and dinner on it, in the same day. Whats wrong with you!!??? 🙂

    Yes, the train to now where should get the axe.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

L.A. could consolidate elections

Los Angeles is considering holding its local elections at the same time as national ones. According to the L.A. Times,

You moderate! No, I'm not!

The Republican gubernatorial race, epitomized by last night’s debate between Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner and former eBay executive Meg Whitman,

Can we repeal AB 32 now?

AB 32 is the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. It is cutting state greenhouse-gas emissions by 25 percent by