Crazifornia: Still more Cali-Incompetence on the Bay Bridge

170px-Bay_Bridge_collapseMay 23, 2013

By Laer Pearce

It’s been almost a quarter century — 23 years, seven months and five days, to be exact – since the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake knocked out a section of the eastern span of the Oakland Bay Bridge, causing one of the earthquake’s 57 fatalities.

Despite the huge chunk of time that’s passed, California is still bungling along without a safe replacement bridge in place.

Yes, the new span is supposed to be ready to open this Labor Day, Sept. 5. But whether it’s ready, and whether it’s safe, remain to be seen.  And the cost? The first bid came in at $1.4 billion, and we’re at $6.3 billion today — with some potentially very expensive fix-it work ahead.


Here’s a brief summary and timeline of the slowly unfolding human disaster that followed the natural disaster:

* After the quake, Republican Gov. Pete Wilson proposed a concrete viaduct as a replacement, which could be built cheaply ($1 billion, he thought) and safely.

* That idea was promptly shot down by haughty Bay Area leaders, who refused to accept something as pedestrian as a viaduct. (A viaduct is mundane — just several short spans tied together, getting from one side to the other without any showiness.)

* For the next 10 years, Bay Area politicians fought over an appropriate design, while the patched-together Bay Bridge remained vulnerable to the next big quake. 

* It was decided the western portion of the eastern span (leaving Yerba Buena Island towards Oakland) would be a “signature structure” and the rest would be … a viaduct.  A design contest was held, judged by the Engineering and Design Advisory Panel (EDAP) of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. You might be shocked to learn that many of the design finalists were proposals submitted by the very firms that employed EDAP members, and the ultimate winner was an EDAP member’s entry. “This posed a serious conflict of interest,” said one analysis. Indeed, especially since the selected design was more expensive than the alternatives.

* The mayor of Oakland at the time, Jerry Brown, protested mightily because the signature structure was as far away from Oakland as it possibly could be. He said the design “speaks of mediocrity, not greatness.” 

* Gov. Gray Davis put an end to the squabbling and moved the selected design forward, signature span, viaduct and all.

* When a single submitted construction bid was opened in September 2004, state officials were surprised to see it was $1.4 billion, about twice what the number-crunchers at Caltrans thought it would be.

* Gray was gone and Arnold was in, and in December 2004 Gov. Schwarzenegger canceled the contract, saying it was too expensive. Instead, he wanted an all-viaduct design. Ghosts of Pete Wilson!

* Signature span hawks fought back in a battle of conflicting cost estimates until, in November 2005, a “compromise” was reached that returned the signature span. It’s not clear to me what the countering half of this compromise was, but the cost of the delay is clear enough: as much as $400 million. That’s a small price to pay for great bridge architecture, right?

* Construction got under way, and a few months later, in April 2005, welds on the bridge were called into question.

* On October 27, 2009, a crossbar and two tension rods collapsed, dumping 2.5 tons of debris onto the upper deck roadway during the evening commute. One car and a delivery truck were struck, but no one was killed. The bridge was closed to traffic in both directions for six days.

* In November 2009, a cracked eyebar was discovered that would have closed the bridge had it not been under a temporary construction closure already.

* As detailed in my book “Crazifornia,” in November 2011 Caltrans got caught covering up that one of its staffers had fabricated the results of tests on the integrity of Bay Bridge concrete pours, including pours of the structure supporting the massively heavy signature span tower. A report on what this means to the bridge’s integrity is due out in Spring 2013 — any day now.

* In March 2013, three big bolts (3 to 19 feet in length) that connect portions of the bridge deck to concrete columns failed load tests. Subsequently, 30 of the bridge’s 96 bolts failed the test. Some of these bolts cannot be removed because the bridge has been built around them.

* Also in March, 32 galvanized steel rods snapped when being tightened. There are 1,900 such rods on the new bridge. The Sacramento Bee reported Caltrans justified use of galvanized steel rods based on their successful use on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, but provided this quote from a corrosion expert: “Low stress on [the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge] means nothing for the Bay Bridge, where the stress is so beyond the other application.”

* And just this last Saturday, the Sacramento Bee reported that incompetent construction and bureaucratic ineptitude have led to rust forming on steel tendons that are critical to the bridge’s safe operation. First, Caltrans did a duct tape fix (Really, with actual duct tape!), then they attempted to minimize this problem. Metallurgists expert in how steel performs under corrosive conditions have declared the rust to be a very big deal, however.

So, what did we get for our quarter century of waiting and 450 percent cost overrun? A bridge with a design that satisfies no one, that may not have met the basic requirement that it be safe, and that certainly will have much higher ongoing maintenance and repair costs than it should have.

Welcome to Crazifornia. And thank you, Caltrans.

Laer Pearce, a 30-year veteran of California public affairs, is the author of Crazifornia: Tales from the Tarnished State.


Write a comment
  1. David Austin Smith
    David Austin Smith 23 May, 2013, 09:40

    As a native Californian recently moved to Nevada, I can’t wait for the “Bullet Train”. This should be entertaining! I predict that the B. T. will make the Bay Bridge joke look like a good deal!!

    Reply this comment
  2. jimmydeeoc
    jimmydeeoc 23 May, 2013, 10:24

    Having read the references and anecdotes imbedded in CWD posts for some time, I’ll go out on a very sturdy limb and suggest that pretty much everyone here is over 40.

    With that said, I can confidently state: None of us will ever live to see the completed HSR project.

    Reply this comment
  3. stolson
    stolson 23 May, 2013, 10:46

    Sounds like a qualified non political bridge building firm needs to come in and analyze this whole grim scenario and make serious recommendations and how to fixes. Eliminate Caltrans. Otherwise, more fighting.

    Reply this comment
  4. Tax Target
    Tax Target 23 May, 2013, 11:01

    This all leads to a new term: Calnincompoops! Seems to fit!

    Reply this comment
  5. Dyspeptic
    Dyspeptic 23 May, 2013, 11:19

    @ David Austin Smith,

    First, congratulations on moving to a (sort of) free state. Second, do whatever you can to get Harry Reid out of the U.S. Senate. Third, feel free to gloat over not having to pay for all the graft, incompetence and corruption you read about here. Finally, if that really is your name you are either very brave or very naive. Remember, you’re only safe from Big Brother if you’re anonymous, ridiculously lucky or a member in good standing of the ProgBot-Libtard Oligarchy.

    @ jimmydeeoc,

    “I’ll go out on a very sturdy limb and suggest that pretty much everyone here is over 40.”

    Guilty as charged. However, what I lack in youthfulness I make up for with BAD ATTITUDE.

    Reply this comment
  6. Sean Morham
    Sean Morham 23 May, 2013, 13:04

    Can t wait for the HSR employees staffing the terminal. Note the dude cleaning the toilets at $150k per year with the 25 and out pension at 85 percent of his final pay(plus spiking), driving home in his state supplied electric Lexus turning in the home electricity bill for reimbursement. Sweet!

    Reply this comment
  7. ECK
    ECK 25 May, 2013, 20:38

    I am not surprised at any of this. A classic example of a “too large government” operation. This has been going on for at least 40 (time I’ve been a Californian) years. The CalTrans bureaucracy can’t manage anything. I’d bet that a huge majority of the most monetary successful projects they’ve had were ones that were wholly contracted to a private source. Witness the Hwy 1 Devil’s Slide project.

    Reply this comment
  8. Groundfisher
    Groundfisher 26 May, 2013, 06:52

    You failed to mention that the large box spans were fabricated In China, when there were/are so many people here in the US without jobs

    Reply this comment
  9. brad
    brad 28 May, 2013, 22:56

    Exactly why I’m planning on leaving the golden state.
    Parts of that bridge fell directly in front of me….

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Summary details high-speed rail problems

  As construction is going forward, now would be a good time to clear the air a little and summarize California’s high-speed

Democrats now see downside of CEQA

Feb. 11, 2013 By Steven Greenhut SACRAMENTO — Although many of California’s legislative Democrats are eager to “test drive” the

Boxer-Feinsten water bill stresses conservation, not supply

There are two ways to manage water. One way is to capture more water and store it for dry years.