Illogical liberal view of Sen. Ted Cruz’ Canadian birth

Ted Cruz - wikipediaMay 29, 2013

By John Seiler

Sometimes I wish people would take a course in logic. Here’s a free one.

The Chronicle reported in a story by Richard S. Dunham:

“It seems like an obscure court case from a dusty old law book, but if Canadian-born Texas Sen. Ted Cruz decides to run for president, you’re likely to hear a lot about United States vs. Wong Kim Ark.

“In the 1898 case, the Supreme Court voted 6-2 to repudiate the exclusive language of the infamous Dred Scott case and create an expansive definition of the Constitution’s “natural-born citizen” clause.

“That’s important because the Constitution requires that the president be a natural-born citizen – and Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, in 1970.”

So far so good. But then this:

“In 2008, both presidential nominees faced lawsuits to disqualify them based on their place of birth….

“GOP nominee John McCain, the son of a naval officer, was born in the Panama Canal Zone, then a U.S. territory, in 1937, months before Congress approved a law guaranteeing birthright citizenship to children of military personnel serving abroad. To erase any doubt, the U.S. Senate approved a bipartisan resolution confirming McCain’s citizenship, and a legal challenge to his eligibility was rejected.

“There was far more fuss over false claims that McCain’s Democratic rival, Obama, was born in Africa. A series of lawsuits were tossed out of court.

“None of the anti-Obama ‘birthers’ has stepped forward to challenge Cruz.”

In the comments section, someone named “caldroolidge” (oh, liberals are so clever!) wrote:

“None of the anti-Obama ‘birthers’ has stepped forward to challenge Cruz. You mean they were a bunch of lying hypocrites from the beginning? Shocking.”

Do you see the problem? In 2008, both McCain and Obama were candidates for president. But Cruz is not a candidate. He might be in the future; he likely will be. But as of today, he isn’t. So there’s no reason to “challenge Cruz.”

And the “birthers” only would be “lying hypocrites” if they didn’t challenge Cruz if he becomes a candidate. Caldroolidge also calls them a “bunch,” tying them together. But there were thousands of “birthers,” and it’s almost certain that, should Cruz run in 2016, some of them will challenge him as well on his birth.

I also remember that this came up in the 1968 election when Republican Michigan Gov. George Romney, born in Mexico to American parents, ran for president. He was challenged on his birth, but he faded in early primaries so the issue never got legs. He was Mitt’s pa.


Spock logicHere’s a syllogism Dunham and Droolidge seem to be advancing:

Major Premise: The “birthers” challenge any candidate for president not born in the U.S. on his eligibility.

Minor Premise: X is a candidate for president not born in the U.S.

Conclusion: Therefore, the “birthers” will challenge X on his eligibility.

But the Minor Premise is false in the case of Cruz because he’s not a candidate. So the syllogism is false.

I grew up with liberal professors and politicians who could think. Guys like Sen. Eugene McCarthy and my professor at the University of Michigan, Carl Cohen. Even though we disagreed on many things, I learned from them and admired them.

Not that conservatives are all that great at logic either, but liberalism seems to have descended into paralogy and name calling.

1 comment

Write a comment
  1. Hondo
    Hondo 30 May, 2013, 20:50

    Obama’s own biography says he was born in Kenya. The one he gave to his book publisher. That bio stayed that way till just after he announced he was running for president. For 16 years it stayed like that, saying he was born in Kenya. It was even updated after the 04 convention speech. It still said he was born in Kenya. The Chicago tribune reported he was Kenyan born. Obama was the original birther. The book publisher covered for Obama, saying that they wrote his bio. Apparently he is the only person in the history of publishing that didn’t write his own bio.
    I believe he was born in Hawaii. I believe he mislead many people about his background so he would appear more worldly. A sin of his youth. I have sinned too. People will forgive youthful indulgences. If you ask for forgiveness.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

How to overfill prisons: Have SEC look at CA school districts

March 20, 2013 By Chris Reed The federal indictments this week of CalPERS’ former president and his alleged briber show

Stemming police violence/misconduct: Why LAPD should emulate Rialto PD

The more I watch the law-enforcement complex at work, the more I think our criminal-justice system is often akin to

Being CalPERS means never having to say you’re sorry

Jan. 20, 2013 By Chris Reed So CalPERS is found to allow ridiculous, outrageous double-dipping by salaried employees that boosts