Assembly passes ‘punitive’ tax bill

June 27, 2013

By Katy Grimes

check

SACRAMENTO — As the Legislature is about to recess for the summer, tax increase bills are the immediate focus. When the Legislature reconvenes August 5, it may not have a Democratic Supermajority. Several legislators won local elections and will be taking up their new positions, reducing the Democrats’ numbers below the two-thirds threshold.

Tax bills need a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to pass — and they are getting it.

AB 458, by Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski, D-Fremont, claims to prevent a tax loophole that allows companies to take a deduction when a court holds them liable for punitive damages.

“There has been much discussion recently about whether California corporations pay their fair share of taxes,” Wieckowski said in testimony today about AB 458, which I attended. “This bill does not attempt to address that issue, but it does take on one business tax deduction that I believe everyone can agree is logically indefensible. Punitive damages should not be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses.”

But Assemblywoman Shannon Grove, R-Bakersfield, a business owner, challenged the state practice of penalties to punish employers. “The law says employers have to list a specific address for the employer’s bank on paychecks, or the state imposes a $50 per-employee penalty on the employer,” she said. “We punitively punish employers in this state to the point they are all leaving.”

Grove identified  numerous other ridiculous requirements on employers, all passed by the Legislature. “I urge a ‘no’ vote and ask you to stand up for business owners.”

Unique and strict California wage and hour laws

What Grove was talking about was the state-mandated itemized listing of 11 different items an employee must receive on a pay stub:

* Inclusive dates of the pay period;

*Name of the employee and last four digits of the Social Security number;

*Name and address of the employer;

*All applicable hourly rates in effect during the pay period and the corresponding number of hours worked at each hourly rate by the employee.

Failure to include all required information with each paycheck can result in penalties of $100 per employee, per violation, up to a maximum of $4,000 per employee, according to the State of California Labor Commissioner.

California law also requires employers to keep a copy of all payroll records, showing the daily hours worked and the wages paid to its employees for at least three years, or be assessed a $250 penalty as an initial citation, and a $1,000 penalty for each subsequent violation.

“It’s a stretch to say a tax on business owners is not putative,” said Assemblyman Brian Jones, R-Santee. “In the United States, California ranks as the least business-friendly state in the nation. And California ranks as one of the least legal-friendly in the nation.”

Jones called the bill “nonsense.” That rankled the lawyers in the Assembly.

“Penalties are not putative damages,” said Assemblyman Roger Dickinson, D-Sacramento, a lawyer. “Putative damages are imposed by a judge and jury,” he added, appearing to split hairs. “Why would we give a tax break to someone who oppresses or does something constituting fraud?”

“It does not balance our budget,” Wieckowski said. “It will raise only $400,000 in additional revenue a year.” He said businesses assessed punitive damages have committed “some reprehensible action.”

AB 458 passed the Assembly with the two thirds necessary, 54-24, on a party-line vote.

5 comments

Write a comment
  1. I'mjustsayin'...
    I'mjustsayin'... 27 June, 2013, 14:51

    “some reprehensible action.” … describes how this Super-majority is running roughshod over the California voters and business owners. Legislating on a whim…no matter the consequences.

    Reply this comment
  2. skippingdog
    skippingdog 27 June, 2013, 19:54

    So is it “punitive” or “putative”? There seems to be some mixing and matching of the terms in the story.

    Reply this comment
  3. Hondo
    Hondo 27 June, 2013, 22:07

    The ‘reprehensible action’ is being unable to read the ten thousand pages of legalize the is the state labor code. I am collage educated, but I feel like Trayvon’s brain dead girlfriend, Jeantel, when trying to figure out our labor laws. No one can read or figure out that ‘cursive’.
    Hondo….

    Reply this comment
  4. Steve Mehlman
    Steve Mehlman 29 June, 2013, 12:26

    How funny! I have never seen any tax increase of any amount for any purpose that the ‘Dog does not considered “punitive.” So what’s the “news” here? Your headline is absurd.

    Reply this comment
  5. Queeg
    Queeg 30 June, 2013, 08:34

    Bagdad Bob’s clone speaks!

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

CARB acted like 'mob enforcer'

APRIL 14, 2010 By ANTHONY PIGNATARO The metaphor Kit Enger uses most often when talking about the California Air Resources

Justice for Oscar Grant?

Steven Greenhut: When I’ve written about controversial police shootings in my time as a columnist and editorial writer for the

Survey: Voters want more police oversight, reform

This year, Californians wanted more police reform than they’ve gotten. The results of a new poll, touted by activist groups, revealed