What’s being ignored in the Calderon scandals

What’s being ignored in the Calderon scandals

It’s interesting to see what stories the big newspapers choose to run, and more interesting to see what they ignore. Rather than never letting a good scandal go to waste, big media is part of making the news, or keeping some news quiet.calderon_t

More than one week ago, the Hews Media Group broke a big story about California State Assembly Speaker John Perez collaborating with former Assemblyman Tom Calderon and Central Basin Municipal Water District officials, “in an attempt to coerce three Maywood Mutual Water Districts into taking on unwanted projects that if they did not accept, the districts, as Calderon said, would be ‘dissolved with a stroke of a pen.’”

One of the water districts’ general managers later asked who Tom Calderon was, with Calderon answering, “I was a State Assemblyman, my other brothers were Assemblymen too, so (laughing) we got the politics covered.”

The projects would have landed Calderon and his allies, as well as the Central Basin Municipal Water District, a lucrative $25 million dollar consulting contract to “fix problems” that one Maywood Mutual Water District General Manager insisted twice in the audio recording “we don’t have, or we were already working with the WRD to fix,” Randy Economy and Brian Hews reported.

Hews Media Group has three audio tapes of the meetings and deal making, which are now in the hands of the FBI.John_Pérez_2011

“Calderon is heard on the audio recording saying he was ‘summoned’ by Speaker Perez and the Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to call the meeting that included Enrique Gasca, one of Perez’s top staff lieutenants, CBMWD General Manager Art Agiular, Sergio Palos, General Manager of MMWD #1, Gustavo Villa, GM of MMWD #2, and Bob Ruhlf, who is the GM in District #3,” Hews reported.

This is big news worthy of a RICO investigation. RICO is the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, passed in 1970, to eliminate the ill-effects of organized crime on the nation’s economy.

But since the Hews Media Group October 24 story, it’s been only crickets in the mainstream media.

The other Calderon scandal

Instead, most news outlets are focused on the latest scandal surrounding Sen. Ron Calderon, D-Montbello, Tom Calderon’s brother and chairman of the Senate Select Committee on California’s Film and Television Industries. He stands accused of offering to help provide a state tax credit for films that cost less than a $1 million.993730_580629288670400_1521315881_n

On Saturday, I published a story about Freshman Assemblyman Ian Calderon, D-Whittier, Ron’s nephew, authored two bills in 2013, AB 344 and AB 533, also involving the movie industry. And, Freshman Assemblyman Ian Calderon, 28, was given the chairmanship of the Arts, Entertainment, Sports, Tourism and Internet Media committee, by Speaker John Perez.

Again, it’s been crickets in the main stream media.

It is likely that representatives of Assembly Speaker Perez made some phone calls discouraging further reporting of his Calderon connection. Hews Media Group reported that the Los Angeles Times was also provided with the audio tapes, but refused to do the story.

The meeting, the dealcalderon_t

At the time of the meeting, Hews Media Group reported that records show Calderon was being paid $11,000 per month by Central Basin Municipal Water District for “public affairs.”

Aguilar begins the meeting with an explanation of why they were “summoned” by Perez and Villaraigosa and then says to the Maywood Mutual Water Districts general managers, “anything can happen if the money is there.”

“Almost three minutes into the meeting, Enrique Gasca enters the room and is introduced as Speaker Perez’ Director by Calderon,” Hews wrote. “Calderon goes on to say, ‘if we can’t make this (the project) happen we are all in a lot of trouble, in terms of things you want from Sacramento and his (Speaker Perez) ability to retaliate or encourage things… I have never seen a Speaker who does not get what he wants.’”

Calderon continues: “Here’s the deal, we need to be proactive, if we are not, if we do not put a plan together we can all support, the MMWD’s can be dissolved with (Calderon snapping his fingers) a ‘stroke of the pen’, it can be done,” reported Hews Media Group.

“One of the GM’s angrily says, ‘and this is your solution to better quality water?’”

“Calderon answers him, ‘it (the water quality) doesn’t matter, the (goal of the project) does not matter.’”971426_369444129823618_1901605208_n

The bill that Calderon was talking about was Assembly Bill 240, first authored by Perez after he became Speaker. The current bill was authored by Assemblyman Anthony Rendon, D-Lynwood.

The bill was also being pushed by former Assemblyman Tom Calderon, and only targeted the Maywood Mutual Water District.

AB 240 was signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown.  According to Rendon, “AB 240 addresses the water quality problems in the 63rd Assembly district by requiring mutual water companies like those that that deliver water to Maywood’s residents to comply with the Brown Act and the Public Records Act—two icons of public agency law.”

The audio recording has Calderon telling the group that “the quality of the water is not an issue, but painting a perception that the water is bad is the intent and if the water is presented as being bad, then the money will be there.”

He goes on to say, “if we can do that, then that will make him (Speaker Perez) feel comfortable enough to go ahead and move forward (to disburse the $25 million). He (Perez) will want to have an independent agency receive the disbursement-Calderon indicates that CBMWD as the agency-and would be the appropriate entity to control the process.”

Twenty minutes into the meeting one of the Maywood water districts general managers asks “what do you want us to do?” Calderon’s response was, “as long as it is agreeable to us (Calderon, Aguilar), I don’t think the Speaker (Perez) is going to care how it is done, as long as it is getting there,” Hews reported.

Aguilar then prompts the GM’s for a “needs list” and tells them that, “it is in the best interests of you and your owners to cooperate with us and Speaker Perez.”

“In what was probably indicative of the entire meeting, one GM says to Aguilar, ‘so you want me to give you a list of things that I need to replace to solve a problem I don’t have.’” Aguilar’s response was a loud laugh followed by “yeah.”

For the audio recordings, click HERE.


Write a comment
  1. Randy Economy
    Randy Economy 5 November, 2013, 11:33

    Thanks Katy and CAL WATCH DOG for this RAW look into what we have been going through as hard hitting, working class, COMMUNITY journalists here in the JUNGLE of media in California! If anyone wants to talk to me or Brian Hews, my Publisher, PLEASE feel free to call our office at 562 407 3873. Randy

    Reply this comment
  2. Manuel Arago
    Manuel Arago 5 November, 2013, 23:41

    Thank you for pointing out this insolent act of abuse of taxpayer’s funds. In order to stop the corruption in Sacramento and at the local levels we need your help and assistance in identifying and coordinating legal resources that will step up to challenge specific illegal acts at the local level?

    Possible solution – Asking conservative legal entities or counsel members to establish pro bono or reduced fee service pools for specific geographical areas so concerned citizens can provide legal artifacts to support moving forward on critical governmental events that were executed in an illegal manner.

    Your content services are uniquely suited for recruiting conservative members to financially support these legal entities or for assisting in organizing these legal entities. I am all for protecting our first amendment rights but besides the HJTA there seems to be no other legal entity or organization that will step forward to challenge illegal events at the local level.
    There are quite a few responsible conservative citizens here in the South Bay area (Torrance, Redondo Beach, El Segundo, Palos Verdes) that would be more than willing to pool $1K-2K contributions to support legal attacks against the collective bargaining’s manipulation of publically presented information and governmental compliance requirements.
    FYI – another set of noteworthy ethical violation we suggest you look at is the documented Torrance City Council ethical violations at http://www.friendsoftorrance.com (See blog sites).
    In addition we recommend you review the the blog concerning the Critical Information About Torrance’s Pension Problems blog at: http://www.friendsoftorrance.com/critical_information_about_torrance_s_ca_pension_problems.
    In this blog we point out the fact that Torrance’s Police Chief 2011 pension contribution of $131,195 was the 16th largest pension contribution out of ~1.2 million 2011 California Controllers Government Compensation records.
    We would just like to make sure that everybody knows Torrance’s (CA) top seven (7) senior Safety Officers (Police & Fire) are in the top 1/1000 of one (1) percent (0.0014%) of the highest paid personnel in the state of CA out of approximately ~1.2 million CA public employees based on their FY 2011 pension contributions.
    Torrance has seven (7) senior Safety Officers (Police & Fire) in CY 2011 where taxpayers paid in more than required annual pension contributions > $100,000. Yes, seven (7) Safety Officers pension contributions were greater than $100K. In fact the average for these seven Safety Officer’s pension contributions was ~$113,000.
    Torrance’s annual pension contribution rate for our Police Department (TPD) on July 1st 2014 (FY 14/15) will be at a minimum ~57.60% of their covered TPD payroll and ~52.60% for our Fire Department. On July 1st 2013 Torrance taxpayer’s contributions for our average annual pension & Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) contribution costs for each police officer was ~$72,000 and for each fireman it was ~$63,000. These annual pension contribution costs are in addition to their pay and benefits.

    It is time to stop this spending madness and readjust our priorities to ensure we stop mortgaging our children’s future standard of living to pay for these multi-million dollar pension annuities Torrance is handing out.

    Reply this comment
  3. eck
    eck 6 November, 2013, 19:31

    With so many pols like this, we’re doomed.

    Reply this comment
  4. Marcia Hanscom
    Marcia Hanscom 7 November, 2013, 18:42

    This is yet ANOTHER reason that we – the experienced & educated public – are fed up with these big water bonds. We must wake up the rest of our citizens as to what these agencies, electeds and their cronies in consultancies and contractors are collaborating on for “projects.” When I first read the story by Economy – with the quotes about how the project wasn’t needed, I couldn’t help but wonder how we could get our hands on a similar recording re: the Malibu Lagoon Massacre boondoggle. We who fought that terrible, destructive and unnecessary project KNOW that conversations like that had to have happened. “We are going to do this project whether or not it is needed. We’ve convinced the Governor it’s about jobs!” That MUST have been said – but who has the recording? Or the guts to blow the whistle on other bureaucrats? And now the same sort of unnecessary and EXPENSIVE project is being planned at the Ballona Wetlands Ecological Reserve on the LA coast. It’s another boondoggle, with millions in bond money spent just to STUDY the plan they already know they want to do.

    Reply this comment
  5. Tom Bemis
    Tom Bemis 22 November, 2013, 15:54

    You forgot to ask a few simple questions: Just what exactly is going to happen to this $25,000,000 when it gets to the CBMWD slush fund, and why precisely is it “appropriate” that they receive this money? Surely it has nothing to do with their ability to disperse that money to whom they so choose?.?.? And who do you suppose that might be? NOT THEM for sure! Come on folks. Wake up. It’s time to take a turn in the conservative direction don’t ya think?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

L'Aristocracy de CalPERS

Steven Greenhut: Someone sent me this hilarious video about California’s government royalty. It’s a little long but very, very funny:

Government held to far lower standard than private sector

The gap between the standards seen in the private sector and the public sector have never seemed bigger. In the

Rent control proposition proving tough sell even to Democrats

With the cost of housing driving California’s emergence as the state with the highest percentage of impoverished households, it’s easy