Why ‘climate change’ is a useless phrase
In the late 2000s, “climate change” began replacing “global warming” as the phrase used to encourage government intervention to prevent man-caused climate catastrophes. In 2006, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, greatly increasing regulatory control over state industries.
Shortly after, “global warming” went out of favor, replaced by “climate change.” Just two years later, in his acceptance speech at the 2008 Democratic National Convention, candidate Barack Obama didn’t mention “global warming,” only “climate change.”
For example, in a debate over global warming on our site last week, one commentator wrote, “It’s called climate change, John. You have record cold in some places and record heat in others.”
But the phrase “climate change” is a logical fallacy called a tautology, also called circular reasoning. According to the Philosophy Index, “A tautology in logic is a formula that is always true on any valuation or interpretation of its terms.”
Or as I put it, something that explains everything, explains nothing.
Here are some examples of tautologies:
- Either it will rain tomorrow or it won’t rain.
- Bill will win the election or he will not win the election.
- She is brave or she is not brave.
- I will get in trouble or not get in trouble.
- Mary will turn the light on or turn it off.
So here are some examples using “climate change”:
- Climate change is causing the earth to warm and cool.
- Climate change is causing more and fewer hurricanes.
- Climate change is causing greater and lesser crop harvests.
- Climate change is causing higher and lower sea levels.
- Climate change is causing smaller and larger polar ice caps.
Government
Of course, the main reason this logical fallacy is used is to increase government control over our lives to make sure “climate change” doesn’t destroy the planet. It doesn’t hurt that some connected crony capitalists, such as Al Gore, have become even richer by investing in global warming/climate change technology boosted by governments.
The problem has cropped up that the global-warming hypothesis is hard to advance when temperatures have ceased increasing the past 15 years. And although one year doesn’t make a trend, it doesn’t help that much of the United States continues to freeze under record low temperatures.
So “climate change” seems a better phrase because it can, as has been shown, mean anything. The problem though is that, although most people are not logicians, many people can sense something isn’t quite right about phrases based on logical fallacies.
A common fallacy is the argument based on an irrelevant appeal to an authority, such as a celebrity pitching a credit card or diet program. (Appealing to a real authority, such as a physician to heal your aliment, may be valid.) Many people understand that the celebrity isn’t a banking expert; or might have lost weight not because of the advertised program, but because of personal chefs and trainers only the rich can afford.
With a tautology like “climate change,” at least some people understand that it’s a phrase with no explanatory value.
(Note: I am is not arguing about whether or not global warming is occurring, only that those who believe it is occurring should use that phrase, not “climate change.”)
52 comments
Write a commentWrite a Comment
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Related Articles
Agency lauds enormous fine on business
Jan. 18, 2013 By Steven Greenhut When you talk to business owners who are considering a move out of state, their
Missing from CA’s economic ‘comeback’: Los Angeles
Gov. Jerry Brown’s daily push to depict California as being in a sharp rebound from the 2007-2009 economic meltdown ignores
Report predicts surprisingly strong CA turnout in primary
The conventional wisdom holds that primary turnout in California is generally weak unless there is a particularly contested election of
The phrase “climate change” is only useless in the more ignorant parts of the world….well…..hmmmmm……..like here in the USA!
Ted: Read again what I wrote. As I noted at the end, I was not (in this article) denying man-caused global warming. I was just pointing out that “climate change” is a useless phrase. Please deal with that part of it. Explain how a tautology is NOT a logical fallacy.
John, at least Teddy didn’t try to say Ronnie Raygun invented “climate change” 😉
Poodle– You’re confusing climate change with carbon credit.
It’s ok little buddy!
LOL John– OK– You have correctly defined tautology. Of course you’re a denier in this important bulletin and of course this short alert about the lexicon, I guess, prosecutes your point in some way?
You’re a caution!
The Ted Concept.
This will be brutal…..you’re head could explode…..but….here goes…..colder in winter and hot in summer makes for rebuts a plenty…..Teddy save me!
first, they deny it,
next, they say “it conflicts with the bible”,
then they say, “I knew it all along.”
“Amazingly, science is not based on belief. It is based on evidence. According to the National Academy of Sciences, the definition of science is “The use of evidence to construct testable explanations and predictions of natural phenomena, as well as the knowledge generated through this process.”
“People often ask if I believe in global warming. I now just reply with the question: ‘Do you believe in gravity.'” — Neil deGrasse Tyson
Simple quotes seem cleaver, but when looked at closely fail to pass the logic/reason test.
TCS, it’s people like you that caused Thomas Paine to write the “Age of Reason.” If you ever want to expand your intellect you should read the book, but I am not assured that you have the ability to comprehend his perspective. 🙂
I’ve read it. I was responding to Johns discussion of argument by appeal of authority.
Neil deGrasse Tyson is not just a celebrity, he IS a real authority. From what I have seen and read of Dr. Tyson, he would disagree with Johns understanding of science, AND his definition of the word “tautology”.
AND, Dr. Tyson still uses the phrase “global warming”.
Well said Moderation Douglas—- Dr. Tyson is in good company with the vast majority of the world’s climate Phd’s!
Or maybe we should get our science from Rush? Hmmmmm…
Douglas: My main argument was not about an appeal to authority; I just used that as an example of another type of fallacy. My main argument was that “climate change” was a logical fallacy because it holds no meaning. I was not talking about man-caused global warming in this article, as I noted at the end.
But of course what you say the composition isn’t about is precisely what the composition IS about.
John, trying to reason with a person entrenched with dogma he celebrates is a non-winning game. It is on a par with radical Muslims, it’s their way or the highway!! 🙂
Regardless your feelings for Neil TCS his quick and cleaver statement are not even congruent. Gravity has nothing to do with the religion of Al Gore and his global warming lie.
This phony doctrine is all about the control of individuals not connected to the RAGWUS. 🙂
Well, I thought it was cleaver.
“Well, I thought it was cleaver.”
I am SURE Teddy did too Douglas.
🙂
No Poodle– I thought is was “clever”. YOU thought is was cleaver.
Teddy, don’t even look up “cleaver” in the slang dictionary. You’ll get us all banned.
Kinda Freudian.
Douglas: Read again what I wrote. As I noted at the end, I was not (in this article) denying man-caused global warming. I was just pointing out that “climate change” is a useless phrase. Please deal with that part of it. Explain how a tautology is NOT a logical fallacy.
Please see my response supra.
The Ted System
These people believe the earth is flat, the the world is less than 5,000 years old, etc.,etc. So gravity might be stretch for them.
Now there is an original thought!! LOL 🙂
Well said Steve!!!!!
Steve: Read again what I wrote. As I noted at the end, I was not (in this article) denying man-caused global warming. I was just pointing out that “climate change” is a useless phrase. Please deal with that part of it. Explain how a tautology is NOT a logical fallacy.
For the record, I don’t believe the earth is 5,000 years old. I also do not believe that a tautology is a valid argument; it is a fallacy.
Yes John, you are correct about tautology. When indirectness is the cornerstone of your religion then all that is left is blind faith. Global warming is bad religion. 🙂
LOL– Hey John– Looks like ol Duncey agrees with ya! That must make ya feel pretty confident ol buddy.
oh my
Only because John is correct. Now where is the school that is offering climate change PHD’s TCS? 🙂
John you are absolutely correct!! Even the scientists have no clue what they are talking about. These same quacks had the refrigerant R-12 removed from production because it was destroying the ozone only to find out it never reaches high enough to even effect the ozone, the solar winds have been doing the real damage, and doing it since the beginning of this world.
“Scientists have been trying to find out why the rate of global warming has eased in the past 20 years while greenhouse-gas emissions have surged to a record. Today’s paper elaborates on a theory that deep seas are absorbing more warmth by explaining how that heat could be getting there.”
“The net effect of these anomalous winds is a cooling in the 2012 global average surface air temperature of 0.1–0.2 degree Celsius, which can account for much of the hiatus in surface warming observed since 2001,” the researchers wrote. They’re led by Matthew England, a professor of oceanography at the University of New South Wales in Australia.
Now we can take a look at TCS’s godlike figure and his solution for controlling the weather:
Global warming activist Al Gore told the World Economic Forum “making fertility management ubiquitously available” is key to the future of civilization and efforts to limit global warming. Gore said such efforts to manage African women’s fertility were important in his desire to reduce the growth of human population.
In the lefts attempts at control of individuals they have created a religion of weather, which has the widely held belief as ever changing. Hence want is the root of this change? Al Gore above sees population as the problem, but only the Black population of Africa. This is TCS’s leader!!
Now dance for me TCS, twirl your feathers my parrot. Tell me how your leader Al has the answers to redeem your wicked RAWUS feeding soul. 🙂
RAWWUS?
OR
SQWIDWID?
Think about it little buddies!
Sorry TCS, RAGWUS!! 🙂
Oh, and a DIADA !
You sure do!! 🙂
Dr. Donkey has been very eloquent on this thread…..my kit includes little on climate…..Teddy is he correct?
Yes UU, the Donkey is correct!! 🙂
Yes — Duncey is a PhD level climate scientist, you can trust anything he says on the matter, 100% I just give him a hard time because he is a devil worshipper ™
There are no PHD’s in climate science TCS. As close as you are going to get is your buddy Al, and one of his top solutions is to stop Africans from breeding.
Now dance for Al Ted(TCS). 🙂
Yes Sir Dr. Duncey. LMAO!
Of course there’s this one–
http://www.princeton.edu/cics/graduate-degree-program/
Ouuuuuuuuuuch– and this one!
http://www.climatescience.cam.ac.uk/opportunities.html
Keep your knees high my little climate controlling dancing parrot!! Tell me more little man about how you and Al are going to control the weather. How much CO2 are we allowed? How much nitrogen? Should we have Monsanto genetically engineer plants that double their oxygen output?
Come on TCS, is it that we just need more RAGWUS feeders to produce more regulations for the private citizens?
Parasites in bureaucracy, starring TCS!! 🙂
Oh– Duncey, and then there’s this other PhD in Climate science…LMAO
http://aoes.gmu.edu/climate_dynamics
Oh and this one–
http://scrippseducation.ucsd.edu/Graduate_Students/Prospective_Students/Program_Areas/climate.php
and about 30 more! LMAO— God Bless ya little buddy but once again this year you win the CWDMIPA
CWD’s Most Incorrect Poster Award 2014!
Go SQWIWID!!!! LOL
PLEASE keep posting!
I knew I could get you to dance harder TCS, spread those feathers my parrot, now show us how any of this academia has helped your friend Al, since 2001 the atmosphere has been cooling. Now dance for me TCS, just dance!!
The Great Lakes are soon to be completely frozen over my little tax stealing parasite. 🙂
Zzzzzzzz– it’s winter little buddy— or should I say Climate PhD little buddy? LMAO
Still he dances, as the Great Lakes completely freeze over, faster TCS, faster!!! Help Al little parrot!! Dance!! 🙂
Can you do 1 pushup little buddy?
Dance my Tu tu wearing parrot!! Al wants to rid the eastern part of the nation of cold and ice TCS, shuffle those feathers little man!! 🙂
Can you do 1 pushup little buddy? ™
He’s still dancing! 🙂
Teddy….aghast…..does Dr. Donkey realize his cover is compromised…..does he spit fire out of both orifices?
Dr. Duncey says there’s no such thing as a PhD in climate science! LMAO– I think he’s just being modest! Or perhaps his organic brain syndrome ™ is kicking in again!
Oh. Thks for the heads up….then he is disgraced and has to turn his divining and lightning rods along with his snake worship liturgies?