Green Bank Czar could oversee new state bureaucracy

Green Bank Czar could oversee new state bureaucracy


Obama czarsIn American political parlance, a “czar” is a government official put in charge of a project. For example, the head of the federal Drug Enforcement, currently Michele M. Leonhart, commonly is dubbed the “drug czar.”

Now state Sen. Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, is proposing to establish what in our state could be called a Green Bank Czar. This still is in the early stages, but is important to watch, especially because he is slated to become the next state Senate president pro tem.

He is advancing Senate Bill 1121, the California Green Bank Act. It will be heard by the state Senate Rules Committee, chaired by current Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, sometime before March 22.

SB 1121 reads:

“This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would establish the California Green Bank to coordinate, align, and enhance the state’s efforts to provide energy finance programs for advanced energy technologies and projects throughout the state.”

Note the word “intent.” If this bill passes, a second bill would be needed to provide the exact details of what the Green Bank would do. But the structure of the new state bureaucracy would be roughly what is called for in SB 1121:

“[W]ould establish a board of directors for the California Green Bank to be composed of appointees by the Governor, the Legislature, the Treasurer, the Department of Finance, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Energy Commission, and the California Air Resources Board, who possess expertise in financing and green investments.”

The California Green Bank would be led by:

“[T]he position of an executive director to manage and conduct the business of the California Green Bank, subject to the direction of its board.”

Although not called that directly, the executive director would be the Green Bank Czar.

Green Bank functions

The Green Bank bureaucracy’s functions would be quite extensive over the state economy and would include:

“(1) Reducing rates and decreasing costs for California ratepayers while expanding the accessibility and affordability of clean energy for all Californians.

“(2) Increasing private investment in clean energy projects that currently are not able to obtain financing in traditional capital markets at a reasonable cost by providing a variety of financial tools to stimulate private investment.

“(3) Achieving California’s environmental and economic objectives by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing investments in disadvantaged communities.

“(4) Facilitating efficient, low-cost private financing markets for clean energy projects.

“(5) Supporting California’s unique position as a worldwide leader in clean energy innovation by helping to bring innovative technologies to market.”

Number (3), for example, would tie the Green Bank bureaucracy in with AB32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which mandates reducing greenhouse-gas emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020.

Any legislation implementing the Green Bank would have to spell out how it would interface with the California Air Resources Board, which under AB32 is implementing current greenhouse-gas reduction efforts.

Existing Green Bank

However, California already has a Green Bank established in the State Treasurer’s Office.  Treasurer Bill Locker’s website explains:

“The State Treasurer’s Office does its part by serving as California’s Green Bank. The office invests a portion of funds from the Pooled Money Investment Account (PMIA) in bonds that finance green projects throughout the world and operates two authorities that finance and administer programs and projects that promote green jobs and green California industries, keep our air and water clean, and encourage conservation of natural resources and the use of alternative energy.

Some of the projects include:

California’s new Green Machine politics

In 2009, President Barack Obama and created 38 executive branch “czars.” The most high profile czar was Van Jones, a “Special Advisor on Green Jobs.”  Jones had previously made a name for himself by founding nonprofit agencies in California, such as “Green For All.” And he wrote a book, “The Green Collar Economy: How One Solution Can Fix Our Two Biggest Problems.”

In New York, machine politics was historically founded on boroughs and immigrant neighborhoods. In the middle of the last century, Robert Moses was the czar and “power broker.”  In Chicago, machine politics was based around wards and Mayor Richard Daley.

In California, a new Green Machine politics is emerging, centered around “joint powers authorities,” regional “Strategic Action Committees” between state and local government and green “Watershed Groups” that would usurp local home rule.

If the new Green Bank Czar position is created, it would maintain immense influence over all these projects.

A century ago progressive politics came into power in California to banish the influence of the political machine of the Southern Pacific Railroad over the Legislature. 

Ironically, today progressive politics seems to be establishing — perhaps even without conscious knowledge — a new machine politics within the Legislature based around green economies and industries. If SB1121 passes, and further legislation enacts what it calls for, there would be a Green Bank Czar who could oversee it all.


Write a comment
  1. MadMax3
    MadMax3 7 March, 2014, 12:15

    A Czar is an unelected, unaccountable fascist (meaning; you own it, they control it.) If we need Czars to manage our lives, then dispense with the elected officials entirely.

    Reply this comment
  2. Hank
    Hank 8 March, 2014, 10:41

    The plan for a Central Bank of California, the lender of last resort and least scrutiny. Taxpayers responsible but not otherwise involved. A desperate proposal to continue the California Ponzi.
    For an indication of the brilliance of these creatures see the report on this blog regarding campaign money management.
    What could go right? A ship of fools, with Captain Moonbat.

    Reply this comment
  3. billybs
    billybs 8 March, 2014, 16:23

    Mr. de Leon, representing the state of Oaxaca, maybe that is Lara, I get them confused.

    Reply this comment
  4. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 10 March, 2014, 06:43

    A very good article.

    Fascinating to observe in real time the metastasis of the state throughout the organs of society.

    The proliferation of ‘czars’ is one major symptom of the late stage of the disease. ‘Czars’ began, in classic problem-reaction-solution fashion, as an unaccountable/non-democratic fix to a perceived serious problem. Czars and the bureaucracy they embed in are codependent, and the first order of business is always finding more money so they can pay themselves more.

    California, with its proliferation of alphabet soup environmental agencies, paradoxically has a natural environment that is pretty thoroughly trashed. Yet the governmental layers continue to rain down like leaves in the forest, forming a thick soft duff that seems to nourish the growth of even more government. Once at work we were looking at an overlay of San Diego county for the fairy shrimp critical habitat, and someone remarked that if we had an overlay for every state and federal agency program it would be a couple of thousand pages thick and reach to the ceiling.

    Reply this comment
  5. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 10 March, 2014, 11:45


    Chill Bro.

    Is this all that important.

    Let them Czar up to the moon.

    Nothing changes anyway.

    Same old bureaucracy that will survive even a Czar revolution.

    Reply this comment
  6. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 10 March, 2014, 18:33

    MORE government bureaucracy’s with 6 figure employees, that is JUST WHAT THE DOCTOR ORDERED!!!!! (Y)

    Yikes 🙂

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

2018 gubernatorial race already heating up

Still more than two years away, the race to succeed Gov. Jerry Brown in 2018 has already become one of the

Californians fleeing our lovely state

Oct. 1, 2012 By Steven Greenhut SACRAMENTO — Not long ago, I penned a case for staying in California, arguing