New fears push more California e-cig bans

New fears push more California e-cig bans

e-cigarettes, wikimediaSouthern California’s thriving e-cigarette industry faces a big new problem: nationwide, their products are becoming a hot new focal point of public health worries.

In the latest report casting “vapes” in a negative light, the New York Times called the nicotine solution found in e-cigs “poison by the barrel.” That has producers and retailers in a “defensive crouch,” according to the Riverside Press-Enterprise. The most sensational danger posed by nicotine “juice” is its potential to kill children who consume even a teaspoon.

That alarming piece of data presupposes a nicotine concentration level that not all vials of juice contain. For anti-vape advocates, however, the Times report is an aid in turning public opinion firmly against permissive e-cig laws.

California’s robust market for vapes makes the state a critical test case for the advancement of new prohibitions. Relying in large part on health fears surrounding the safety of children, advocates have already made substantial gains on the West Coast.

In Los Angeles, City Council President Herb Wesson delivered an impassioned address during the floor debate, testifying that his desire to “be cool” as a young man led to a lifelong addiction to tobacco cigarettes that would probably end his life.

The city extended its sweeping tobacco cigarette ban to vapes, permitting their use in “vaping lounges,” but rejected an exemption that would permit vaping in bars or nightclubs with a 21-and-over policy.

Crackdown

In the wake of the action by Los Angeles, other California municipalities are considering a crackdown of their own. The Long Beach city council voted to ban vaping even inside places where e-cigs are sold, prompting an outcry from industry business people. One distributor objected that half of the juice sold in South Orange County is actually nicotine-free, the OC Weekly reported.

Frustration is mounting over officials’ tendency to ban now and ask questions later. As the current director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention told the Times, “I think the precautionary principle — better safe than sorry — rules here.”

Judging by developments in California, municipalities agree. “If you watch the city council meeting,” the Long Beach vape distributor told the Weekly, “some of the members said they don’t have enough information to make a proper decision, but they decided to go with the original ordinance anyway.”

The precautionary principle may well take hold among some citizens as well.

Elsewhere in the state, the Santa Cruz city council is now set to consider whether to become the 46th California community to add e-cigs to their tobacco smoking ordinances, according to KSBW. While city officials worry that failing to crack down will permit confusion and disorder to take hold, residents find themselves even less informed than would-be regulators. KSBW illustrates the point by citing one restauranteur’s support for a ban “because of the unknown effects of e-cigarettes.”

While local governments often look to Washington, D.C., for strong guidance and information about which substances to ban or regulate, federal data on e-cigarettes is still lacking. That has led lawmakers in at least ten states to treat e-cigs like tobacco cigarettes, or ban their sales to minors, with still others considering industry-specific taxes and tougher regulations for online commerce.

Permissive

The case for more permissive e-cig regulations, meanwhile, now centers on a few key arguments. Proponents point to the absence of harms equivalent to secondhand tobacco smoke, the lack of adverse findings by the Food and Drug Administration, and the inspirational power of e-cigs to draw smokers away from cigarettes’ lethal carcinogens. Nationwide, libertarian organizations are turning their attention to increasing public awareness of these attributes.

New developments suggest that the tide of regulatory opposition is now leading vapers to organize and push back. Confronting an e-cig ban in the San Diego County town of Encinitas, the Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association created a tip sheet, complete with talking points and city council contact information.

As the need for a better public image grows clear, a confrontational attitude to e-cig crackdowns is increasingly discouraged. In its recommendations, CASAA urged vapers who attend the Encinitas hearing to refrain from smoking e-cigarettes.

It remains to be seen whether the e-cig movement’s turn to better public relations is enough to keep California vapers in the regulatory clear.

1 comment

Write a comment
  1. Kathryn Silvia
    Kathryn Silvia 27 October, 2014, 14:28

    NO body, ANY where, needs another toxic pollutant foisted upon them by self serving industries and ignorant abusers. The Tobacco Companies have already proven their priorities and destructive modus operandi, ecigs need to be banned at EVERY level, if not Worldwide. One Planet, One Solution.

    It took far too long with too much devastation, but the majority of people have finally become informed enough about the negative affects of smoking cigarettes, that it is on the decline. Vaping is not “harmless water vapor”, not with unregulated ingredients and formulas of juice, and particularly not when an ecig is used as an implement for illicit, home brewed drug abuse. (hence their phenomenal popularity with the less than savvy young people).

    Unfortunately, in the tobacco industry’s desperation and blatant disregard for the safety and welfare of humankind, our children, local wildlife, and the World environment… they have wrought yet another vehicle of addiction. Thus imposing its pollution and consequences upon the UNWILLING populations.

    As a Society, lets not repeat these same mistakes with ecigs and their questionable use, juice and litter. Smokers, Tokers, and Vapists have no right to impose their vice on others, or to damage a Community’s health.

    Why is “America the beautiful” indiscriminately trashed with a mulch of cigarette butts and its toxic waste… do we really want to add even more plastic, metal and glass bits containing concentrated poisons and drugs to the mix? I would rather have Bees and Sea Life!

    Our Constitution’s “pursuit of happiness” never meant that you can just do anything and everything you want, particularly at the expense of other people’s rights… and it NEVER should!

    The base NEED of breathing healthful air and access to non toxic water and foods will be further in jeopardy by yet another assault on our well being… ecigs will just become another form of uncontrollable, migratory pollution that is unjustifiable by even the lowest of standards.

    … We CAN avoid this particular affront NOW…
    … We NEED to NOW!

    There is no excuse.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply


Tags assigned to this article:
tobaccoJames Poulose-cigarettesHerb Wesson

Related Articles

Gun sales spike before California law hits

  Unwilling to be locked out of the gun cabinet by Sacramento Democrats, California residents have pushed gun purchases up

Supreme Court ruling appears to help Vergara plaintiffs

A landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision last week that Texas programs implementing the federal Fair Housing Act have had a

Budget Negotiations Getting Combative

MARCH 18, 2011 By KATY GRIMES The Legislature Thursday passed the main budget bill, with nearly $14 billion in spending