Appeals court backs bloggers’ First Amendment rights

Appeals court backs bloggers’ First Amendment rights

Bill of rights, wikimediaThe First Amendment protects, among other things, “the freedom of speech, or of the press.” Yet modern governments, less solicitous of our liberties than the Founding Fathers, keep trying to curtail those  rights. The latest gimmick is to insist that only the Main Stream Media are protected by the First Amendment. That blogs, like this one, can be censored by the government.

Fortunately, the courts seem to be siding with freedom. A Florida state Circuit Court recently held that bloggers enjoy the same First Amendment protections as other members of the media. Gigaom reported:

“Under state law, anyone who wants to pursue a defamation case has to notify the media outlet in question five days before filing. But Christopher Comins argued he didn’t have to do so in the case of a blog post from university student Matthew VanVoorhis, because blogs aren’t a traditional form of media and therefore aren’t entitled to notice.

“As Techdirt notes, Comins’s argument was thrown out by the original court, but he appealed. Now, an appeals court has upheld that decision — and in the course of doing so, the judges in question chose to provide some great commentary on the importance of blogging as a form of media.”

Here’s the key section from the court decision:

“The advent of the internet as a medium and the emergence of the blog as a means of free dissemination of news and public comment have been transformative… the impact of blogs has been so great that even terms traditionally well defined and understood in journalism are changing as journalists increasingly employ the tools and techniques of bloggers – and vice versa.”

Indeed, as Gigaom noted, a Pulitzer Prize just was awarded to blogger Glen Greenwald for reporting on Edward Snowden’s revelations that the government spies on all of us, all the time, in violation of our Fourth Amendment rights. (Albeit the blogs also were published in two print newspapers; but most of us read Greenwald’s articles on his blog.)

Freedom is indivisible. Bloggers, fortunately, also are protected by the First Amendment.


Write a comment
  1. Ted O'Steele, CEO
    Ted O'Steele, CEO 19 April, 2014, 21:03

    john— does this apply to a “journalistic venture”?

    And— isn’t this the place where you remind us your Dad was a judge and if u like the opinion you support the bench and if your teabag crew hates the opinion you then pretend Article 3 does not exist?

    Reply this comment
  2. Donkey
    Donkey 21 April, 2014, 07:22

    Make it illegal to speak ill of the RAGWUS, every feeders dream! 🙂

    Reply this comment
  3. Queeg
    Queeg 21 April, 2014, 07:31

    Poor Donkey….the little white wagon is on it’s way. Your final ride to careful care will be sweet and comfortable…’re assured….really…now take your meds!

    Reply this comment
    • Ted O'Steele, CEO
      Ted O'Steele, CEO 21 April, 2014, 08:15

      If we could only adjust his meds Dr. Q– we may have a productive Adelantite there able to dip corn dogs like the others?

      Reply this comment
  4. Queeg
    Queeg 21 April, 2014, 08:22


    Just thinkin-

    Are corn dogs sorta mind altering?

    By the way…..looked in Donkey’s Yugo and he had lots of Der Weinerschnitzel coupons.

    Did you know he was a Euro gourmet?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:
bloggingFirst AmendmentJohn SeilerGlenn Greenwald

Related Articles

Bill would mandate double time on holidays

A new bill would mandate double-time pay for some holidays. The Bee reported: Californians working through the holidays could get heftier

Ballot initiatives results vary

Katy Grimes: From City of Sacramento races, to the state of Ohio Governor’s race, election predictions appear to be coming

Politics pollutes ‘water rights’ bill

Aug. 30, 2012 By Katy Grimes SACRAMENTO — An interesting debate took place Wednesday in the Assembly over a bill