Only in CA: Costly edicts depicted as jobs programs

Only in CA: Costly edicts depicted as jobs programs

When Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed AB 32 into law in 2006, he did so after first demanding that the measure include a provision that would allow a governor to suspend it if there was evidence the law was hurting the economy. This was in recognition of the fact that forcing the state to have more costly energy than its economic rivals in other states and nations was fundamentally risky.

draftscopingplan2But two years later, however, Schwarzenegger — in full legacy-hunt mode — didn’t say squat when the California Air Resources Board released a “scoping” plan of the economic impact of AB 32 that was full of happy talk that depicted the law as akin to a job-creation program.

Professional economists pushed back. The “peer review” of the findings was harsh. The panel included Harvard’s Robert Stavins — perhaps the world’s leading environmental economist. Stavins backed AB 32 but considered its happy talk ridiculous. “I have come to the inescapable conclusion that the economic analysis is terribly deficient in critical ways and should not be used by the state government or the public for the purpose of assessing the likely costs of CARB’s plan,” he wrote.

Stavins later told The Wall Street Journal that if shifting to cleaner-but-costlier energy were good for businesses, they would have already done it.

That’s such a crisp, simple Occam’s Razor way to frame this issue.

Unfortunately, in the California of 2014, when it comes to economics, we’re in a post-common sense era.

‘Skimp’ on wages? You’ll make less money!

This is playing out in San Diego, where the City Council’s liberal supermajority wants to make a big splash before November elections in which they are likely to lose their power to impose legislation over a veto by Republican Mayor Kevin Faulconer.

The main way they want to make this splash is by sharply increasing the minimum wage in the city. The initial proposal was to make it $13.09 cents an hour by July 2017. That would be nearly one-third higher than the $10 that will be the minimum state rate effective 2016.

wageBusiness interests point out that this will hurt San Diego on competitiveness grounds. Advocates initially responded by saying job losses from a minimum wage hike would be minimal. But somewhere along the way, the spirit of the loony air board infected their thinking, and now San Diegans are being told that a minimum-wage hike is, yes, a rising tide that will lift all boats.

Consider this nugget from this op-ed defending the City Council’s plan. The gist is that business operators who try to keep costs down are idiots who don’t know what they’re doing:

“Employers who skimp on wages and benefits don’t make more money, they make less. They have greater turnover, resulting in more training, and they engender less loyalty and more cheating.”

Oh, give me a break.

CA activists lecture business on how to make money

According to this one-size-fits-all theory, Wal-Mart and carwashes and taco stands and all the non-union companies in the world that try to keep wages down are simply buffoons who are lucky to still be in business.

The arrogance of this is stunning.

The truth, of course, is that — as the world’s leading environmental economist told The Wall Street Journal — businesses won’t reject strategies that make them money. They will embrace such strategies.

But as I said, we’re in a post-common sense era in which activists and liberal pundits who have never made a payroll or run a business look at successful businesses and say something akin to the following:

Hey, you idiots, you don’t know what you’re doing.

Surreal. And so California-ish.


Write a comment
  1. Ronald Stein
    Ronald Stein 17 June, 2014, 08:24

    AB32: CARB continues to disregard that California contributes only 1% to the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, or that their largely symbolic policies that no other states or the federal government have any interest in adopting, will drive up the cost of energy and transportation fuels for our 37 million Californians, falling most heavily on small businesses and lower income communities that can least afford it. CARB’s efforts will ensure that our already over-regulated businesses will be even less competitive with out-of-state-rivals than they are now, driving up unemployment and over burdening the financially challenged.

    Reply this comment
  2. Ronald Stein
    Ronald Stein 17 June, 2014, 08:26

    Raising the minimum wage: Raising the minimum wage is only a band aid over the wound of the financially challenged, but does not HEAL the wounds for the financially challenged.

    Our government and special interest groups have done a great job of marketing. We continue to “camouflage” more regulations, more taxes, and fees on businesses, and force the financially challenged to disproportionally pick up the costs that trickle down from businesses to their pocket books for products and services?

    Those that earn less than $20 per hour, which includes virtually all those in the food and hospitality industries, are the ones that can least afford higher costs for power, transportation fuels, and food. There is minimal impact to those that can afford the results of our relentless business unfriendly efforts, but little hope for those that barely exist at today’s cost of living.

    If you can remember several decades back, most couples could survive on one income. However, today most couples are two income families just to tread water in today’s costly economy.

    The method to counteract the ever increasing costs to the financially challenged, from the costs of over regulations, over taxation, and uncontrollable fees on businesses that trickle down to the pocket books of the financially challenged, is to raise the minimum wage for the financially challenged. BUT WAIT….is this a camouflaged Ponzi scheme, or just a way to buy votes from the financially challenged?

    Reply this comment
  3. Donkey
    Donkey 17 June, 2014, 12:48

    The RAGWUS has become very clever at buying votes and putting fear into the minds of the slaves they have created with their scheme of stealing money for themselves and making money scarce for the private sector. 🙂

    Reply this comment
  4. Seanmorhamcpoly
    Seanmorhamcpoly 17 June, 2014, 18:25

    Go Olga, Go.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Does Jerry Brown Break Campaign Law?

Sacramento talk radio host Eric Hogue discovered this very interesting audio and video of Jerry Brown meeting with Labor International

Push for sharp minimum-wage hike under way in San Diego

California’s second-largest and the nation’s eighth-largest city appears sure to have a six-month-plus debate over whether to raise the minimum

Defiant UC Davis chancellor’s days likely numbered

It’s growing difficult to imagine circumstances in which UC Davis Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi — once considered a high-performing star