Vergara’s grim implications for CA Dems ignored

Vergara’s grim implications for CA Dems ignored

vergara.posterWhen Asian-American lawmakers objected to efforts by black and Latino lawmakers to gut Proposition 209 and bring racial quotas back to college admissions and other state government programs, the California media thought that was news. Nexis shows 85 stories about the proposed changes to Prop. 209 in the past six months. This L.A. Times piece from May analyzed how the rift developed. Here’s the Associated Press piece from January that first brought national attention to the issue.

Now we have a landmark court ruling that portends another, even more consequential rift between California Democratic factions. The Vergara vs. California decision posits that state policies which protect mostly white veteran teachers and funnel the worst teachers to schools in poor minority neighborhoods are an unconstitutional affront to equal protection laws. The judge explicitly likened his ruling to Brown vs. Board of Education, the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that “seperate but equal” public school systems were unconstitutional.

This puts the Democratic coalition at great risk. Its most powerful members — the CTA and the CFT — are accused of orchestrating an assault on the interests of the children of blacks and Latinos — its most loyal voters.

Politicians on a hot tin roof

This can’t be finessed away. Or at least it can’t be finessed away if the media ask about it. It’s now been three weeks since the ruling, and as far as I can tell via Google and Nexis, I’m the only print journo in California who thinks this is an interesting angle that merits coverage.

I wrote about it in a Sunday editorial. Notice how the Latino lawmaker I got a comment from — Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez — tries to finesse the implications of the Vergara decision.

“The Vergara decision represents a new challenge to those of us who support both the civil right of every child to a quality education and the original intent of teacher tenure which protects academic freedom and provides basic worker protections of due process for education professionals,” the San Diego Democrat wrote in an email.

“Should the decision be upheld on appeal, the Legislature will have to develop a new legal paradigm to protect both students and teachers. I look forward to participating in those discussions.

“In the meantime, I will continue my efforts to hold the California Department of Education accountable for its failure to protect the rights of English language learners. This failure highlights that there are problems in civil rights protections for students that have negative consequences for far more children than teacher tenure.”

Latino pol: It’s the Education Department’s fault!

So Latino students’ civil rights have indeed been violated. But it’s not the CTA or the CFT’s fault. It’s the California Department of Education that must be held “accountable.” Wow, that’s a stretch.

Why aren’t the Sac Bee, the LAT or the Bay Area News Group interested in this angle?

Why don’t Dan Walters or Dan Morain or any beat reporter covering the state government think this is juicy stuff?

You’ve got me.

8 comments

Write a comment
  1. T.Steele
    T.Steele 24 June, 2014, 08:22

    A superior court unpublished ruling is now a “landmark” ruling?

    I don’t think it’s legally even “persuasive”.

    Overruled in 3,2,1….

    Reply this comment
  2. Chris Reed
    Chris Reed 24 June, 2014, 16:01

    T. Steele must have missed the news.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/robert-gibbs-ben-labolt-legal-fight-teachers-union-incite-agency-108243.html?hp=l3

    This is a national story and a national trend.

    Reply this comment
  3. SkippingDog
    SkippingDog 24 June, 2014, 19:07

    Some hungry DC lobbyists hoping on Campbell Brown’s band wagon does not a national trend or movement make, Chris. Let’s see how well the trial court decision holds up at the appellate level, and how much more personal wealth Welch is willing to spend on litigation, before you start claiming a trend or movement.

    Reply this comment
  4. Seanmorhamcpoly
    Seanmorhamcpoly 25 June, 2014, 19:37

    Licking Hog, You are a racist. Go back to your cell, you pig. I will pray tonight you and your spawn die a painful death, due to a relentless cancer, that penetrates every bone till they break, and several years later, you croak.

    Reply this comment
  5. Donkey
    Donkey 26 June, 2014, 06:51

    The RAGWUS will be destroyed, by their own greed and total lack of integrity. 🙂

    Reply this comment
  6. The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm)
    The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm) 26 June, 2014, 14:10

    ragwis means what again?

    Reply this comment
  7. SkippingDog
    SkippingDog 26 June, 2014, 23:16

    I know I’ve hit the target when misfits like Sean and Donk start spraying spittle on their screens and banging out another unintelligible screed in response. Perhaps a doctor visit to check your medications is in order?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Prop. 26 shows teeth, kills San Diego hotel tax hike

One of the few recent big triumphs of the small-government, low-tax movement in California came in 2010, when state voters

‘World-class’ Sacramento deal dead

April 15, 2012 By Katy Grimes Ding, dong, the arena deal is dead. The free market won. Despite the failure of 13

Can GOP stop FCC attack on the Internet?

The Federal Communications Commission, controlled by Obama Democrats, is poised to impose a 1930s telephone-regulation model on the Internet. It