CA hits roadblocks in Obamacare implementation

CA hits roadblocks in Obamacare implementation

Covered California front page, Oct. 3, 2013It’s a bumpy road for the implementation of Obamacare through the Covered California exchange.

Thanks to the cumbersome and convoluted nature of the process, state regulators are grappling with bad provider lists, limited plan acceptance and a host of complaints from Californians caught in the mix. Patients, doctors and even whole hospitals have fallen into confusion over whether they are “in” with a particular carrier’s health care plan.

According to the Sacramento Bee, the impact of the regulatory bewilderment is widespread. Some customers haven’t received ID cards or enrollment packets. Some insurers, meanwhile, have found themselves under new legal scrutiny. California state law puts the onus on them to make sure they accurately list doctors participating in plans — and to have enough providers on those lists to meet demand.

Behind the numbers

Part of the chaos has been caused by a spike in new customers. A new Kaiser Family Foundation survey indicates that some 3.4 million adults gained coverage in California over the last year. But most surveyed who did gain coverage had to rely on an “outreach worker” or “enrollment agent” capable of navigating customers through the tangled web of rules, regulations and forms. And about half of the increase in total covered came through California’s expansion of Medicaid, not through the Covered California exchange set up under Obamacare.

What’s more, the rise in insured has come with an even more startling increase in health care premiums. Critics of the Obamacare legislation had warned premiums would skyrocket. Advocates of the health care law, on the other hand, conceded that some increases were necessary to pay for the costs of wider coverage.

As John Sexton put it, “Obamacare intentionally created higher premiums for younger people and those not eligible for subsidies on the individual market. Those increases were not only predicted, they were considered a feature, a way to offset the costs of expanding insurance to millions of lower income people who did not have coverage.”

Regulatory struggles

But as Sexton also reports that the leap in premiums — which have risen as much as 88 percent — has led California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones to throw his support behind a new initiative that would allow state regulators to control increases in insurance rates. The power of Jones’ office currently allows him to deem increases “excessive,” but not to halt them.

Proposition 45, which will appear on November’s ballot, is opposed by insurers, who have put some $25 million dollars into an effort to turn public opinion against the measure.

The politics of Prop. 45 are unusual: U.S. Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, both Democrats, support the initiative. But Covered California officials worry that its increased role for regulators would complicate the rate-setting process and undercut their own authority to negotiate rates with insurers.

One such critic is Diana Dooley, the Health and Human Services Agency secretary who chairs the exchange board. Dooley is officially neutral on Prop. 45, but has argued that Covered California should have an opportunity to negotiate premiums downward without putting the “advantages” of Obamacare at risk.

As the Bee reports, Dooley perceives at least some of those advantages to be political, while “the ‘intervention’ process works for other types of insurance, it could encourage critics of the controversial law to challenge rates to the detriment of the exchange.”

She told the Bee “there are people who are opposed to Obamacare without regard to any of the facts, and anybody could throw a monkey wrench in this. That gives me quite a bit of pause.”

Jones, however, identified a more fundamental policy problem created by the politics of Obamacare. “We’ve given them a legal monopoly,” he told the Bee of the insurance companies. “Now, by law, everyone has to buy their product.”

For Obamacare advocates like New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, the outsized role of Medicaid expansion in California’s increased coverage amounts to “stealth single payer.”

Prop. 45 indicates that Obamacare may drift toward single payer in another way as well. Economics strongly suggest that if regulators mandate a monopoly for a handful of large firms, prices will rise significantly. Such a substantial government intervention in the market could well require a second, more serious round of government intervention to cap such increases.

8 comments

Write a comment
  1. SoCalSteve
    SoCalSteve 4 August, 2014, 18:11

    Even Fox and Hounds Daily, hardly a bastion of liberalism, had a piece by long-time health care reporter and columnist Daniel Weintraub which says just the opposite:

    http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/2014/08/covered-california-gets-high-marks-entering-year-2/

    Of course, the Regressives have taken a page from the Joseph Goebbels playbook: If you keep lying about Obamacare being a complete debacle, people will begin to believe it is true.

    Reply this comment
    • Donkey
      Donkey 5 August, 2014, 11:14

      Obamacare is the worst thing since STD’s. Making citizens buy a product they don’t need or want is criminal, and compounding that with RAGWUS incompetency and a useless bureaucracy is absolutely crazy. Then people like SoCalSteve try to sell the debacle off as a winner, it’s like a blind date with a real sow!! 🙂

      Reply this comment
  2. SoCalSteve
    SoCalSteve 5 August, 2014, 13:36

    Donkey wants us to go back to the good old days, when tens of millions of people were uninsured, when insurance companies were free to refuse coverage or drop policies on a whim, and when we taxpayers had to pay millions for the cost of medical care for those who had no insurance and had to go to the emergency room for care. Talk about criminal. Everyone needs insurance, unless they are somehow guaranteed never to get sick. But if they do get sick, don’t have insurance, and can’t afford to get treated, they either go get care on our dime, or they die. Donkey prefers either of those choices to Obamacare. Sad. Donkey has a thing for insurance companies, I guess.

    Reply this comment
    • Donkey
      Donkey 7 August, 2014, 12:57

      No you freaking half-wit, I want freedom from fools like you!

      People have been around for millions of years and survived without “insurance.” Obamacare is a scam just like the RAGWUS. If the state wants to provide healthcare then it should be profit free coverage, not the scam Obama forced down the throats of working Americans. 🙂

      Reply this comment
  3. Queeg
    Queeg 5 August, 2014, 18:49

    Donkey is a retired globalist living behind an iooelectrified gate in iffy Huntington Beach….land where the skins heads roamed!

    He has his and plans on keeping it.

    No dibs or crumbs for you-

    Reply this comment
  4. Dave Boz
    Dave Boz 6 August, 2014, 05:23

    WTF is a ‘RAGWUS?’

    Reply this comment
    • Donkey
      Donkey 7 August, 2014, 12:59

      It’s a rotten government union created organization that steals at every turn from the California taxpayers. 🙂

      Reply this comment
  5. Queeg
    Queeg 6 August, 2014, 08:19

    Ragwus are Rungametti with Ragu on their Bibs.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply


Tags assigned to this article:
Covered CaliforniaObamacareJames PoulosProp. 45

Related Articles

Anti-smoking bills falter in Sacramento

A surprise switch to a bill that would tightly regulate vaping has caused its sponsor to repudiate the legislation. State Sen.

Legislators, governor to get 4 percent raise

A state panel approved a 4 percent increase in pay for legislators and statewide elected officers on Wednesday. The average legislator’s

Controller expands eClaim feature for unclaimed property

California’s chief fiscal officer is making it easier to reclaim private property held by the state. State Controller Betty T.