New California in-car cellphone crackdown begins


Amid lingering criticism and doubts about the feasibility of enforcement, Californians braced for new legislation taking effect in January that will ban almost all handling of cellphones behind the wheel.

Beginning Sunday, law enforcement will be authorized to punish drivers using the devices in accordance with Assembly Bill 1785, authored by Assemblyman Bill Quirk, D-Hayward. “The whole idea is you don’t have the phone in your hand, period,” he told the Sacramento Bee.  

Quirk’s bill, AB1785, plugged what safety officials called a major loophole in the state’s groundbreaking hands-free cellphone laws. Those laws ban talking and texting on handheld phones while driving. But any other handheld use of a phone, such as shooting videos or scanning Facebook, has been technically legal.

Growing risk

Statistics have shown that smartphones make life on the road more dangerous. “The California Department of Motor Vehicles statistics show that in 2015 cellphone distractions while driving caused 12 fatal crashes, 500 injuries and 700 instances of property damage,” Rare observed. Even more recent information has painted a picture of Californians drifting steadily into risky routines. “In a study conducted by the California Office of Traffic Safety in April 2016, at least 12.8 percent of California drivers were observed using a mobile device during the day, up from 9.2 percent in 2015 and eclipsing the previous high of 10.8 percent in 2013,” according to the Turlock Journal. “Due to the difficulty of observing mobile device use in a vehicle, these figures are considered minimums, with actual usage likely several points higher.”

“The OTS study also found that the observed usage rates appear to confirm previous studies, which show more drivers admit to using mobile devices “sometimes” or “regularly” and that fewer drivers believe that talking or texting on a cellphone is a major safety problem. Meanwhile, the percentage of those who say they have been hit or nearly hit by a driver using a cellphone remains steady at nearly 60 percent.”

Although a culture of keeping one eye on the phone and one eye on the road has spread, drivers have not embraced the trend simply for the sake of travel entertainment. Even with GPS, apps have not eliminated the need for basic interactive tasks like following directions, leaving Golden State drivers at risk of citation simply for using their phones as if they were maps. “If you are using your cellphone for directions, it must be placed on the dashboard or windshield of your car,” as the Kern Golden Empire warned

Judgment calls

The fines promised to sting multiple industries reliant on drivers legally monitoring and interacting with their smartphones over the course of their daily drives. AB1785 did leave a carveout with affected businesses in mind, allowing motorists to “activate or deactivate a feature or function” of their devices “with the motion of a single swipe or tap of the driver’s finger.” But the narrow rule left many puzzled as to what possible constituency would find the carveout sufficient. “How does a cop distinguish between texting, which you can’t do, and activating or deactivating a feature or function, which you can?” asked the LA Weekly’s Dennis Romero. “Judges will love this law.” Ironically, the number of citations being dismissed in court under the old rules provided an argument in favor of passing AB1785.

Perhaps the gray area surrounding enforcement contributed to the relatively modest size of the fines imposed by the law. “Violators will be subject to a $20 fine for the first offense, with fines going up for additional offenses,” CBS San Francisco reported. But California Highway Patrol Officer Rodney Fitzhugh told ABC 10 “the cost of the ticket is up to the courts and local jurisdictions.”


Write a comment
  1. Mike
    Mike 29 December, 2016, 13:50

    Does not apply to Mexicans here illegally.

    Reply this comment
  2. ricky65
    ricky65 29 December, 2016, 14:58

    It will be generally ignored like most of the nanny state laws in this state. I’ve people openly use their cell phones next to a patrol car in the other lane at a stoplight and nothing happens. Same with the windshield wiper/headlight law. Next time it rains observe how many of the cars wont have their lights on but nobody gets pulled over. All these laws will be used randomly on hapless victims who are unlucky enough to encounter a cop who is having a bad day. Or possibly the patrol duty officer whipped the troops that day reminding the revenuers their pension fund is running low.
    Passing laws no one obeys devalues overall respect for the ones that should and need to be enforced.

    Reply this comment
  3. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 29 December, 2016, 16:22

    Illlegal aliens,liberal demac-rats and hollywood liberals are exempt of course

    Reply this comment
  4. Hasamindandusesit
    Hasamindandusesit 30 December, 2016, 08:47

    What a bunch of comment trolls. You have absolutely nothing of factual interest to add, so you fall back on ridiculous off topic rants.

    Reply this comment
    • ricky65
      ricky65 31 December, 2016, 07:29

      For a person who claims to have a ‘mind and uses it’, you haven’t made much of a contribution either.
      Go away newbie.

      Reply this comment
  5. Surfcityusa
    Surfcityusa 30 December, 2016, 09:21

    Sad thing is more regulations. Average person can’t know all the laws. There are too many. Should just have a handful of easy common sense laws to point people in the right direction. They can retain my more with less.

    Reply this comment
    • Hasamindandusesit
      Hasamindandusesit 30 December, 2016, 09:24

      Wouldn’t it be nice if that could happen? Unfortunately, this is the real world, populated by both the stupid and the malicious. They are they ones that 99% of laws are aimed at.

      Reply this comment
  6. Dave
    Dave 4 January, 2017, 11:04

    A little more research, Calwatchdog, instead of just using others’ work. That “modest” $20 base fine actually means $162 ticket cost.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:
cell phonesGPSBill Quirkdistracted driving

Related Articles

Legislators Consider Merits of Williamson Act

Mar. 3, 2010 By KATY GRIMES For more than 45 years, California farmers, ranchers and land owners have voluntarily participated

Carly Fiorina On Gold And War

OCT. 11, 2010 By JOHN SEILER Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard calls the duel for U.S. senator from California

State forces Uber to stop testing self-driving vehicles

Uber’s defiance of a California Department of Motor Vehicles’ demand that the pioneering transit company stop testing its self-driving Volvo