Bill would allow liens for unpaid wage claims

Bill would allow liens for unpaid wage claims

 

mark stoneCalifornia labor law soon could become even more problematic for business.

Assembly Bill 2416 is by Assemblyman Mark Stone, D-Monterey Bay. It would allow employees with unpaid-wage claims to file liens on the property of business owners. Stone said it would thwart “wage theft” by employers and recover hundreds of millions of dollars for abused employees.

Business groups warn the bill would create a “dangerous and unfair precedent in the wage and hour arena.”

AB2416 already passed the Assembly, 43-27. It’s scheduled for consideration by the Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday.

Chamber warns of employer harassment

The California Chamber of Commerce argued in an Aug. 8 press release the bill “would allow employees to harass employers by filing prejudgment unproven wage liens on their property.”

The bill does provide penalties for frivolous, malicious liens, according to the committee’s legislative analysis. An employee acting “in bad faith” by refusing to release a lien could receive a $1,000 fine and have to pay the employer’s attorney fees and court costs.

Employers can ask the California Labor Commissioner to remove the lien if the employee doesn’t respond in 30 days to the employer’s request to release it. In response to critics, the bill was amended to exempt an employer’s principal residence from a lien.

But the Chamber warned:

“AB2416 would cripple California businesses by allowing any employee, governmental agency, or anyone ‘authorized by the employee to act on the employee’s behalf’ to record liens on an employer’s real property or property where an employee ‘performed work’ for an alleged, yet unproven, wage claim.

“At the time of recording the lien, the employee would have no burden to provide any actual evidence that the employer violated any wage and hour law. There is no question that improper liens will be recorded on the employer’s or third party’s property.”

The Chamber is also concerned that AB2416:

  • Allows a wage lien on property where an employee worked, potentially making third parties liable.
  • Allows an employee’s creditor the right to record a lien.
  • Does not remove the risk that a homeowner will have to pursue legal action to have an improper lien removed.
  • Precludes financing options for property, interfering with commercial investments, lending and personal home loans.
  • Forces property owners into the state’s underfunded, over-booked court system to petition for removal of the lien before being able to fully utilize their property.​​

​The Chamber argues there are already sufficient protections in place for workers, including the ability to file an unpaid wage claim with the labor commissioner and to appeal that decision in civil court.

Jackson: Wage theft a serious problem

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairwoman Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, speaking at the committee’s June 17 hearing, said something needs to change.

“There is clearly, and I don’t think we have any dispute, we have a serious problem with people who are getting cheated out of their hard-earned money,” she said. “So the question becomes: How do we address that problem in a way that is fair to them?

“A lot of these folks are Spanish-speaking people who are working in minimum wage jobs who are working their tails off and getting stiffed on their wages. There’s $300 million of unpaid hard-earned wages [taken] from people.”

Chamber policy advocate Jennifer Barrera responded that the solution is to expand the powers and increase the budget for the Labor Commissioner’s Office in the Department of Industrial Relations.

“We agree there is a problem and would like to remedy it as much as anyone else,” she said. “Wage theft impacts good actors in the employment community who are trying to do it right and comply with the law.

“What we have proposed and have been trying to do, through either legislation or support for the recent wage-theft campaign that the labor commissioner has launched, is to support the labor commissioner in increasing the labor commissioner’s authority to deal with this issue.”

The commissioner should review a claim to determine whether it has merit before a lien is filed, she said. He also should determine the amount of the claim rather than leaving that to the employee.

“We believe increasing the labor commissioner’s authority is the way we should be going, not necessarily giving this authority to every employee,” said Barrera.

Increasing labor commissioner power would be expensive

But the increase in funding needed to provide that authority would be astronomical, according to Matthew Sirolly, an attorney at the Wage Justice Center who said he’s litigated dozens of lien cases.

“The reality is that as it stands, hearings take a year or two for the labor commissioner to have their resources to actually hold a hearing,” he said.

“So if we were to follow statutory timelines requiring these things to happen in a couple months, let alone some sort of expedited pre-decision to determine whether a lien is valid, it seems the inquiry and resources would have to be on the magnitude of 100-fold. We’re not talking of something that’s realistic.”

The business community is prepared to increase the fees it pays to the labor commissioner’s office if it results in increased power for that office, said Barrera.

“What I’m suggesting is, maybe not this year but next year if this were in place, there would have to be an adjustment of the employer assessments in order to account for the resources necessary to enforce the proposal that I’ve set forth to have the labor commissioner do this as part of the process that already exists for hearings before the labor commissioner’s office,” she said.

Stone joined Sirolly in dismissing that possibility.

“We do require statements made under penalty of perjury, so that we can assure that there’s some legitimacy to the claim,” said Stone. “The issue with the labor commissioner is … we would have to significantly increase the amount of money going to the labor commissioner so they can hire the staff and do that job. I’m not sure that’s realistic in this form.

“This is a form that would not cost the state or anybody else additional administrative fees to put into place, because it’s a self-enforcing mechanism.”

Analyst: ‘Potentially significant court costs’

There actually will be some costs to the state budget and potentially big impacts on the state court system if the bill passes, according to the legislative analysis. The labor commissioner’s office would incur first-year costs of nearly $9 million, with ongoing annual costs around $8 million. The Secretary of State’s office estimates increased costs of $100,000 annually.

The analysis also warns of “unknown, potentially significant court costs associated with additional proceedings regarding wage claims.”

Stone argued those costs are nothing compared to the costs that unpaid workers are facing.

“Government works best when we provide balance,” he said. “The system is completely out of balance. That’s to the detriment of the lowest paid worker. They have rights but absolutely no remedy. If we … have employees without any remedy, what else are they going to be doing, how else are they going to get their issues met, unless there’s something of value against which to attach the claim?”

‘Chilling impact’ on California real estate market

The bill’s costs could also take a toll on the statewide real estate industry, warned Craig Page, executive vice president for the California Land Title Association.

“We think it’s going to have a profound chilling impact on the real state economy of California, both in a residential context and a commercial context,” he said. “I think what will happen is the dragnet of unintended consequences will pull a lot of innocent homeowners into this as well as commercial property owners.”

What is now a fairly straightforward process for a title company to search county records would be complicated by also having to search court records to discover whether a wage lien action is underway and whether the property affected is a principal residence.

“It’s going to take the escrow process that now is a 30-to-45 day process on average and extend it perhaps months if not years as we try to interact with the courts and the labor commissioner to determine how real property transactions will happen,” warned Page.

“We have by definition many wage lien holders who are unsophisticated and not familiar with the recording process who are going to record these. And they are going to be recorded against homeowners in districts throughout California by accident.

“Once the damage is done you have to undo that either through quiet title action, or you’re going to have to go through the courts to get those liens removed. It’s not an easy process to do. Consumers are going to be adversely impacted by this.”

8 comments

Write a comment
  1. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 13 August, 2014, 22:39

    Current problems. Some shave tail contractors, handymen, ignorant casual laborers want to muddle property records with bogus mechanic liens. They try to extort you with outrageous charges totally unfounded or justified……most people are scared being uninformed on how to defend themselves from these vultures and they need attorneys….so you get reamed no matter what.

    My daughter hired a painting contractor. He paid a casual laborer for one day of work….this casual laborer has been harassing and threatening my daughter for three days of unpaid labor for over 18 months….granted he has no claim, but the scenario is unsettling……

    This law will be a worse nightmare….mega nightmare. Bogus claims will be flying all over the place….much of it from shake down artists…..whatever…and an attorney costs $350.00 per hour…..figure on 5k a case minimum….and you can have multiple cases during your property ownership. If this passes, so many coming injustices…..like the bogus ADA law suit scams.

    Reply this comment
  2. Bill Gore the Eternal Magus of Cosmic Wisdom
    Bill Gore the Eternal Magus of Cosmic Wisdom 14 August, 2014, 08:53

    Agreed: This is absolutely balls out totally INSANE! All of you who avidly read my musings on labor know that I’m a softy on the minimum wage, but this proposal is cuckoo for coconuts…Right now scammers are looking at California’s sky-high property values and DROOLING at the potential of this bill. Guaranteed to further gut the California small and medium business community. Guaranteed to convert Ulysses Uhaul into a bona fide doomer, selling out before this gets signed into law and hitting the road up to cool wet safe and sane OREGON, where there’s no sales tax, BTW…..

    Reply this comment
  3. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 14 August, 2014, 18:54

    For some reason the legislature attracts kooks who always want to save the little guy while creating economic nightmares for business owners.

    It is virtually impossible running a business without breaking some unreasonable law. Also, if you advertise your business to grow your besieged by inspectors, regulators, con artists, unscrupulous employees, parasite insurance agents, chamber of commerce hacks, bushels of junk mail….thousands of emails weekly.

    If your brick and mortar your THE TARGET, for all this ilk feel your stuck and you will roll over and succumb to cleaning out of your pockets.

    So….you are seeing business flight, liquidation, outsourcing, becoming a mobile service business with few employees, joining the grey market economy, hiding, selling off brick and mortar……

    Yep. Business is becoming low margin unless your into vices, tech for the truly young and dumb or your into call centers for TV hustles using all those diversity studies/history/music/political science/communication studies graduates out there (someone has to do it).

    Reply this comment
    • Bill Gore Channeling the Mind of Infinity
      Bill Gore Channeling the Mind of Infinity 14 August, 2014, 21:57

      Sounds like your ready to move on up to central Oregon, buddy.
      The local U-Haul center on route 97 has returned UHaul’s rented one way from California lined up
      around the block. Many more coming in than leaving.
      Everything you cite was an inducement for me to vacate San Diego 2.5 years ago, and I
      haven’t looked back. I even like winter….A buddy of mine is a contractor in OC and he says he thinks of leaving “100 times a day”.

      Reply this comment
  4. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 15 August, 2014, 12:44

    Ulysses is a survivor!

    What could go wrong when Queeg got your back?

    Reply this comment
  5. ECK
    ECK 15 August, 2014, 19:52

    Another bad unintended consequence of term limits. This Bozo is trying to make a name for himself to get re-elected to his parasite job. There are already laws and procedures to deal with this kind of problem. It happened to me some years ago. The county DA’s office was glad to point the way towards filling out the right forms and submitting them. Back wages paid (after a few months delay). This is a non-problem. Somebody stuff this guy.

    Reply this comment
  6. Ms. O
    Ms. O 11 September, 2014, 19:41

    Mark Stone runs/ran corruption crime rings. His false red tag scheme in Santa Cruz County to defraud property owners with illegal fees, penalties and fines for bogus violations has snagged thousands of property owners. The slandered title blocks owners from refinancing or selling i.e. no money to pay for lawyers for defense against the corrupt Supervisor/Assemblyman Stone is. A leopard does not change its spots. He also voted in more fees in other areas when the recession started years ago and against protest speeches and factual analysis against such continued insanity. This is bad government. Whatever legislation Stone submits there is either Agenda 21 involved to remove your rights or anti-constitutional directives to remove your rights. He was/is in cahoots with County Counsel, County Administrator, the other 4 Supervisors, Planning Director and Code Enforcement. His ACTIONS speak louder than words. Wake up Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties – Vote for Kain – who stands to right the wrongs! I know what I am talking about – I sued Stone for 4 years and won a huge settlement by a Federal Judge in recently!

    Reply this comment
  7. Raisa Atomz
    Raisa Atomz 7 November, 2014, 13:18

    The Government shutting down in 2013 would be proof enough for tax-payers to realise that most wages have been exhausted through the system “Pay as you go” method. Unemployment insurance was another ripp off. It’s really sad how bureaucrats uses the system to exploit working class people. I hope it comes back to all of them and explode in their cheap faces.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

SB 1 pushes high-rises over suburbs

Will the Manhattan Dream replace the California Dream? The Manhattan Dream is to live in a high-rise in a densely

State Controller fined for disclosure violations from 2014

State Controller Betty Yee was fined $2,082 on Thursday by the state’s campaign ethics watchdog for violations during her 2014

MADD angry at ridesharing regulations

Does ridesharing cut down on drunk driving? Mothers Against Drunk Driving says yes. MADD has entered California’s heated debate over new