Unions bank on CA for new gains

Unions bank on CA for new gains

Union negotiating, taxpayers, cagle, Aug. 26, 2013Across the country, union membership has long been in fairly steep decline. After a series of recent reverses, including a failed attempt to pass national minimum wage legislation in Washington, D.C., union leaders shifted to a state-by-state, city-by-city approach to advancing their agenda. And though their support has not grown much stronger, they have gained enough traction in California to put that state at the center of their struggles.

In an interview with Southern California Public Radio station 89.3 KPCC, one professor familiar with the strategy described an investment of energy with high stakes and, so far, low returns. Kent Wong, director of UCLA’s Center for Labor Research and Education, told KPCC there now are more union organizing campaigns in California than in any other state. Car-wash workers and home-care workers, the station reported, had been successfully unionized according to a model now being exported to other cities across the country.

The report goes on to detail unions’ broad-strokes plans to experiment and expand further in California: “One California organizing strategy has been to pitch union commitment to more than just a bigger paycheck.” That means aligning the union brand with so-called “broader social concerns,” including those relevant to “faith communities and neighborhood groups.”

The specific issues unions have planned to center on may not come as a surprise to many, however. Immigration and minimum wage policy have already been associated closely with a union agenda. With political power shifting away from unions, however, their aims may have shifted too, with a new stress on being strengthened by non-union partnerships.

Education battles

Where possible, unions have made a determined push in California to protect their interests and make new inroads. Education has shaped up as a virtual ground zero for those activities. To begin with, teachers unions have followed Gov. Jerry Brown and state Attorney General Kamala Harris in challenging the ruling in the landmark Vergara case, which held unions’ teacher tenure protections to violate students’ constitutional rights. In a filing with the 2nd District Court of Appeal, the California Federation of Teachers joined the California Teachers Association in calling the decision “without support in law or fact.”

Meanwhile, this year the CTA identified charter schools for the first time as a focus of its strategic planning. Unions have made little progress, but the National Education Association — which counts the CTA as its biggest state affiliate — recently offered some support, sending its new president to two California charters.

Lily Eskelson Garcia dropped in on two small charter schools sharing a campus in Alameda, both of which are unionized. Although the first charter schools were unionized in Los Angeles and other cities back in 2009, as Education Week reports, an anticipated spike in further unionizations never materialized; in fact, the percentage of charter schools that have been unionized has declined by 5 percent from 2009 to 2012.

Turning against Democrats

In its fight to regain the initiative, the CTA has sometimes found itself playing defense against its own frequent allies. Eyebrows were raised in Sacramento early this month when the CTA joined Service Employees International Union to torpedo SB52, a major piece of campaign finance legislation known as the California DISCLOSE Act.

Backed by hundreds of left-leaning groups, the bill was opposed only by the conservative Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and labor unions. According to The Huffington Post, the CTA argued SB52 imposed costly reporting requirements that would hurt smaller campaigns — and, reportedly, that it would violate free speech laws. DISCLOSURE Act backers dismissed those concerns as farfetched.

Few victories

California has handed unions at least one possible opening, however. Late last month, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that FedEx had improperly classified its Northern California employees as “independent contractors.”

That gives unions a potential chance to hunt for members among a new group of workers. But with labor strategy in California hinging on the fate of embattled teachers unions, these kinds of small opportunities may be too few and far between to make a difference.

7 comments

Write a comment
  1. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 11 September, 2014, 16:45

    Good thing about these articles they whip up and motivate lots of fearful residents clamoring for trailers and packing supplies….we expect a strong Fall…..

    Keep up the good work writers!

    Reply this comment
  2. fletch92131
    fletch92131 11 September, 2014, 17:18

    the cartoon couldn’t of been more real;usually in these negotiations, the taxpayer doesn’t really have a voice, he is lost in the crowd, as union negotiators bargain with themselves!

    Reply this comment
    • SeeSaw
      SeeSaw 11 September, 2014, 19:39

      We have a representative form of government. The taxpayers have elected representatives to make these decisions–that is their voice. The union negotiators assist the non-management reps in the process of negotiating with management. If you don’t like that, move to a right-to-work state where you and your children will be able to earn less than minimum wage.

      Reply this comment
  3. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 11 September, 2014, 21:44

    Saw

    Appreciate any moving referrals that come your way-

    Reply this comment
  4. Bill - San Jose
    Bill - San Jose 13 September, 2014, 21:53

    And Sacto wonders why the Tesla factory never had a chance here in CA instead of a right to work state like NV.

    Too blinkin’ funny.

    // my non-union company pays as good and better than most union outfits //

    Next lie please.

    Reply this comment
  5. Dork
    Dork 14 September, 2014, 12:24

    “We have a representative form of government. The taxpayers have elected representatives to make these decisions–that is their voice. The union negotiators assist the non-management reps in the process of negotiating with management ”

    Close but not quite accurate:

    We the Employer (taxpayers) hire a group of negotiators (elected Representatives) to negotiate a CONTRACT with OUR Employees, they secretly meet and hammer out a deal that is Mathematically Impossible to fulfill. Then as soon as the Ink is dry on said contract we find out that Every Last Negotiator was and is receiving MONEY from the very people they are supposedly negotiating with. Thereby rendering any such negotiation a farce. So what does that leave us??

    1. A contract that “requires” future investment from future investors to pay for day to day expenses is the very definition of a PONZI SCHEME and Wholly Illegal.

    2. They are guilty of Felony Collusion, Larceny and just plain old Bribery..

    Reply this comment
  6. SeeSaw
    SeeSaw 14 September, 2014, 14:40

    Not true. The people at the table are all employees–they are not getting extra money above and beyond what is on the table for disbursement. Any union reps and attorneys present are getting paid, of course–that is what they do for a living. I was there for many years and got all my negotiated benefits–mathematically possible. Bribery is what Rizzo did; bribery is what former CalPERS Board member Villalobos did; bribery is what Governor McDonald and Mrs. McDonald of Virginia did. The normal collective bargaining process is not bribery. If you don’t believe in Collective Bargaining, there are many other states that don’t allow it and you can move there where you will be happy to make a lot less than you would make if you were in a union.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*


Tags assigned to this article:
CTAlaborteachers unionsJames Poulos

Related Articles

Supreme Court effectively upholds CA affirmative-action ban

Today the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Michigan’s ban on affirmative action. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote: “There is no authority in

Well, lookie here: Jerry Brown serves as voice of reason

Nov. 28, 2012 By Chris Reed I think Gov. Jerry Brown’s good image in the media is driven much more

Kashkari would veto gun bills

GOP candidate Neel Kashkari assured gun owners Friday he’s opposed to controversial gun-control measures now sitting on the desk of