CA Dems’ congressional delegation on borrowed time

CA Dems’ congressional delegation on borrowed time

Dianne_Feinstein,_official_Senate_photo_2Statewide, California Democrats enjoyed another dominant Election Day. But at the national level, a much different reality has set in for the party’s Golden State representatives. Generational turnover, retirements and a slow but steady erosion of public support have all undermined California Democrats’ position in Congress. The changes have created a significant possibility of a political shakeup to come.

Although California’s congressional Democrats have made a substantial mark on politics, their vigor has run up against one obstacle that even popularity can’t remove: Age. Sen. Barbara Boxer and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi both turned 74 years old; Sen. Dianne Feinstein turned 81.

Traditionally, younger legislative leaders have not had to worry much about unfavorable election cycles that leave them in office. For Boxer, Feinstein and Pelosi, however, their decades in office have left little time to wait for Democrats to recover Congress.

As the San Francisco Chronicle reported, while Pelosi has determined to press on as House Democratic leader, Boxer and Feinstein must both surrender influential positions they have likely lost the opportunity to recover. Boxer has lost her control of the Environment and Public Works Committee.

Even more important, Feinstein has had to surrender her control of the Intelligence Committee. Although some Republicans, such as Sen. Rand Paul, have led observers to think Feinstein’s interest in oversight of the CIA and other agencies will be maintained or even expanded, the loss of her prominence has reminded Democrats that the generational turnover created by this month’s GOP wave could well be permanent.

Eyeing the door

California’s two senators have also encountered an unaccustomed shift in public opinion. Boxer has intensified suspicion that she will retire instead of seek re-election in 2016. Recently, according to the Chronicle, “she told reporters that she has served half her Senate career in the minority and half in the majority, and learned that ‘I really like the majority much better. Much, much better.'”

Boxer did not cite any polls, but her remarks underscore that most Californians have begun to consider it’s time for fresh representation. In new polling conducted by USC Dornsife and the Los Angeles Times, in-state voters have indicated that Feinstein’s future is also at stake.

According to the Times, nearly 60 percent of registered voters preferred that both senators be replaced next time around, saying California “would be better off with new candidates for the two seats.” Perhaps predictably, a preponderance of respondents who identified themselves as Republicans agreed — almost 80 percent.

“But even many Democrats said it was time for new representation,” reported the Times, with 44 percent preferring new candidates — more than the 43 percent that favored Boxer and Feinstein again.

A new playing field

Few political analysts suggested that Boxer, Feinstein or Pelosi have become politically weak. Pelosi’s fundraising prowess and the established electoral advantage of California’s senators would be too daunting to overcome even for a Democratic primary challenger. Nevertheless, more plausible candidates from both parties could emerge over the next year if and when it becomes clear they would run for open seats.

Meanwhile, congressional Democrats have gone out of their way to indicate a willingness to work constructively in the new GOP-led political landscape. Feinstein recently pronounced her respect for incoming Intelligence Committee chair Richard Burr, R-N.C.

And Boxer was able to work with her replacement, James Inhofe, R-Okla., on a previous transportation bill, according to Southern California Public Radio.

With GOP Rep. Kevin McCarthy set to return as House majority leader, California Democrats have set their hopes on playing a role in legislation by keeping attention focused on statewide issues that matter to Washington.


Write a comment
  1. LetitCollapse
    LetitCollapse 13 November, 2014, 10:17

    Oh come on, Mr. Poulous – I think you’re smarter than that. You know it’s not going to make a darn bit of difference whether the Republicans or Democrats own Congress. Look, POTUS Obola is about to pull the trigger and give many millions of lawbreaking foreign indigents amnesty and the key to the nation after they stole millions of jobs from our underclass and scarfed up many BILLIONS of dollars in free medical care, education, etc….. And what do you think the Republicans will do about it???? N-A-D-A!!! Oh they will wag their fingers at Obola and give it lip service. But will they refuse to pass a long-term spending budget and refuse to fund his executive amnesty action? N-O-P-E!!!! They will all complicitly go along with it because they all surreptiously want it to happen!!! But if the American citizens had a chance to vote on it – it would get slapped down 70%-30%. So regardless whether dems or pubs own Congress – we do not have a democracy, Mr. Poulous. The sooner you understand that and begin reporting it in that light, the better. The media is supposed to remove the blindfold. Not make it tighter. We live under a one-party system. The nation is being flim-flammed so that the pols can represent their real constituents – the ruling class. So let’s tell it like it is and throw away the scripts. Okay? 😉

    Reply this comment
    • Terry
      Terry 13 November, 2014, 12:35

      Letitcollapse you are probably right. I hope not. Hopefully there will be enough Republicans that can make a difference.

      Reply this comment
      • LetitCollapse
        LetitCollapse 13 November, 2014, 13:57

        “Letitcollapse you are probably right.”

        Terry, recent history proves me right. Look what happened under Bush with his republican majority congress. He blew up the world economically. And all of congress was in on it. Obola took over and has a dem majority congress. What happened? ObolaCare. You can’t call it the Affordable Care Act because all informed citizens realize that there is nothing “affordable” about ObolaCare unless you happen to be an indigent. If you’re a working class productive citizen they’ve got you by the financial short hairs. Your premiums are going to rise 12% to 15% a year. And if you don’t pay up the IRS penalties are going to be enormous. Somebody has to pay for all the parasites, Terry. That’s why ‘going Galt’ is an attractive option these days. If you aren’t allowed into the ruling class, the 2nd best option is to become a parasite. Otherwise they’ll turn you into a debt slave with small wages and enormous taxes. Recent history supports my theory, Terry. We are not the nation we were only a short 20 years ago. Our evil side has emerged. There is a war on the average citizen going on. The pols protect illegal foreigners before they protect their own citizens. Sick, sick, sick!!!! 🙁

        Reply this comment
  2. LetitCollapse
    LetitCollapse 13 November, 2014, 11:11

    How much money do you think Di-Fi has spent on her face and hair over the last 40 years (to include plastic surgery, make-up, colorings, botox, etc…)? A couple mil? No, I’m not exaggerating. I pay $7 for a haircut. I bet she pays $400 and doesn’t even bat an eyelash. Both she and Jerry Clown need to retire together and walk off into the sunset. Maybe they could join a peaknuckle club for the elite at some Montecito old folks resort and reminisce over the days of ‘free love’ and ‘Chubby Checker’. The wiring in both their heads is going bad and it’s time to hang up the gloves. I don’t want a bunch of people leading my nation who spend half the day looking for their car keys.

    Reply this comment
  3. SeeSaw
    SeeSaw 13 November, 2014, 11:57

    At least, learn to spell, “pinochle”!

    Reply this comment
  4. Dork
    Dork 13 November, 2014, 15:26

    How much money do you think Di-Fi has spent on her face and hair over the last 40 years

    not enough

    Reply this comment
    • bob
      bob 13 November, 2014, 20:44

      Just look at Crimestein…100 years old and not a grey hair on her head…she will live forever.

      Reply this comment
  5. desmond
    desmond 13 November, 2014, 18:09

    Gee, with modern medicine, singularity, Pelosi could serve another 100 years. Just her head on a stick balanced on a Segway. Maybe Bill Clinton would run in Cal, just his head and his (what rhymes with stick) on a Segway.

    Reply this comment
    • bob
      bob 13 November, 2014, 20:41

      Crimestein will live forever, just like Fidel Castro.

      Old Demoncrats never die…they don’t even fade away.

      Reply this comment
    • bob
      bob 13 November, 2014, 20:42

      Crimestein is just like that stain in my carpet…nothing will ever remove it…it’s there forever…just like Crimestein in the Senate.

      Reply this comment
  6. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 13 November, 2014, 19:27

    Word is out Brown, Fiestein and Boxer face images will be carved into Half Dome.

    Bobo time to call for reservations.

    Reply this comment
  7. LetitCollapse
    LetitCollapse 13 November, 2014, 21:55

    Harry Reid, Slimestein and Babs should retire together and do a TV sitcom calling it “Harry’s Girls”. Harry could wear a wide-brimmed peacock hat and drive them around SF in a pink Cadillac in search of desperate generous Pentagon and Wall Street lobbyists, letting the girls work their magic. I bet it would be the biggest hit since “Maude”.

    Reply this comment
  8. ricky65
    ricky65 14 November, 2014, 06:33

    Dino-crats all..

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Feds To Erode CA's Green-Power Edge

NOV. 8, 2010 By WAYNE LUSVARDI California’s often-myopic embrace of “green power” may soon come back to hurt the state.

Correa Wants To Kill 3rd Parties

Steven Greenhut: Sen. Lou Correa, D-Santa Ana, has introduced a bill that has passed out of committee that will effectively

Legislature targets BB guns

SACRAMENTO — Last year, Gov. Jerry Brown signed 11 gun control bills into law and vetoed seven. More gun bills