CA small biz hit with health care hikes

CA small biz hit with health care hikes

No on Prop. 45It wasn’t supposed to be like this.

Proposition 45 on the Nov. 4 ballot would have given the California insurance commissioner the power to limit health-insurance rate increases. It lost.

Opponents, including officials at Covered California, assured voters adequate price controls would be negotiated by the officials running the exchange — without Prop. 45. Covered CA is the state’s health insurance exchange set up under the federal Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare.

But for the state’s small businesses and their employees, those words have begun to ring hollow. As the new year rings in, some 64,000 Californians will see rate increases averaging more than 10 percent — in some cases, nearly 20 percent, according to the state Department of Insurance.

As the Los Angeles Times reported, that nets out to $23.5 million in “excessive” premiums for small business employers and employees.

Broken promises

Party politics only added to the controversy. California’s two Democratic U.S. senators, Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, threw their support behind Prop. 45. But other Democrats opposed it, instead backing Obamacare and the Obama administration figures brought on to ensure Covered CA succeeded in enrolling big numbers (unlike many other state exchanges).

Republicans, meanwhile, saw Prop. 45 as yet another effort to expand government regulation over not just Covered CA, but private insurance concerns.

State Sen. Ted Gaines, R-Roseville, seeking to unseat incumbent Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones, lambasted him for standing with Boxer and Feinstein. But although voters dumped Prop. 45, they also stuck with Jones.

Adamant that its increases are properly calibrated, “Aetna said its rate increase was justified based on the expected medical costs for employers,” the Times reported. Jones’ office had tried, but failed, to limit Aetna’s rate increases to  just 2.6 percent on the 64,000-strong small business group.

A domino effect

For Jones, Aetna’s calculations led to excessive rate hikes because the company misjudged the effect of Obamacare and Covered CA on its risk pools. Although other factors came into play, Jones’ office determined Aetna had wrongly assumed “that customers enrolled in new plans complying with the federal health care overhaul are less healthy than those in older policies,” according to the Sacramento Bee.

What’s more, Jones implied, Aetna bumped up its increases once it looked likely Prop. 45 would go down to defeat.

Pushing back against that interpretation, Aetna vowed through a spokesperson that Jones had it all wrong. Cynthia Michener, the Bee reported, “said that though rate increases are never easy, the rates are based on actuarially sound data and a reasonable projection of future cost. She said the firm Milliman provided Aetna with an independent actuarial analysis and certified the insurer’s assumptions and rates as reasonable.”

Previously, Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini had spoken out against the ACA, warning it would result in higher premiums.


From a bird’s-eye view, however, some analysts have pointed out that Aetna’s rate increases are a rational result of the market distortions created by the ACA’s regulatory framework. As Scott Gottlieb argued at Forbes, “Obamacare was designed with the goal of commoditizing health insurance. The belief was that competition between plans would turn largely on premiums and cost sharing. This was seen as a way to hold down prices.”

What happened instead, Gottlieb explained, was that pushing down on competition in the areas of networks and care delivery discouraged competition between “different benefit packages and plan designs.”

In other words, the big, established coverage providers discovered they could create many variations on very similar benefit packages.

In a free market for health care, different plans would differ in their benefit packages as well — giving small business owners, for instance, greater options around not just scope of coverage but cost of coverage.

Instead, the ACA has dramatically narrowed their available coverage, leaving business owners with little alternative to Aetna’s hiked rates.


Write a comment
  1. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 24 December, 2014, 22:53

    Free is costly.

    Reply this comment
  2. TruthandtheAmericanWay
    TruthandtheAmericanWay 25 December, 2014, 11:38

    Once again the liberal mantra is killing the country – “Why is everything from liberals based on not enough taxation or more government controls?” The day of reckoning is just around the corner and let us hope government employment gets decimated and free markets prevail.

    Reply this comment
  3. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 25 December, 2014, 11:44

    You goose steppers never solve anything…always doom in the future. The future has passed you by many many times….

    So bend over. Pay your taxes, fees and fines. You’re ruled.

    Reply this comment
    • Bill Gore
      Bill Gore 26 December, 2014, 08:42

      The only goose steppers on this board are you and Ms. Ted, ponytails flapping in the breeze, tho I know it does get a little confusing for you ladies trying to spin the narrative….

      Reply this comment
  4. The Sirens
    The Sirens 25 December, 2014, 23:42

    Oh yes Ulysses, keep listening to our call. Turn left onto the rocks over here, where so many fools have tred before you. You’ll be be in equivalently demented company.

    Reply this comment
  5. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 26 December, 2014, 08:39

    This is good. Very good. Everyone needs comprehensive health care insurance, and business owners, vile scum who exploit the labor of their workers to enrich themselves, must be forced to pay more. Eventually, in a few short years, the system will collapse, and in the panic of a national emergency, a true nationalized health care system shall be implemented. Everyone will be on Medicaid.

    Reply this comment
    • Deserttrek
      Deserttrek 29 December, 2014, 16:24

      vile scum? my my .. you need some fresh air .. maybe grandma’s basement isn’t the healthiest place. Single payer .. never

      Reply this comment
  6. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 26 December, 2014, 08:51

    See the well fed blue hairs out jabbing at Uly the blue collar truth sayer.

    Yep the future is so so bleake….doom…collapse…..gloom…..

    “Lighten up my subjects” says Honorable Jerry Brown. Sutter throws you a bone too!

    Reply this comment
  7. Queeg
    Queeg 26 December, 2014, 16:27

    Siren. Welcome….left or right makes little diff.

    Your life is changing due to demographics. The hordes of underprivileged will redistribute as a survival mechanism, for a stinking slaver service economy only brings painful economic misery.

    So when you post Comrade remember you’re mere a grain of sand in the capitalist system with no hope unless you accept collectivism!

    Reply this comment
  8. Dork
    Dork 28 December, 2014, 15:48

    Don’t worry about the increased costs to business for Health Insurance, Most small businesses will begin cancelling their plans and dumping people into the exchanges this year. It will be cheaper to pay the fines. Good luck finding a doctor that even accepts Covered California plans, there are very few, and soon there will be NONE. I have explained this before and it is not rocket science, just simple math, and NO Common Core principles will not change Mathematical LAWS.

    I have 1 employee, He earns $60K, it COSTS me between $80K and $90K for this employee. He MUST produce at MINIMUM of $120K in PROFIT, in order to Keep his Job.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:
ObamacareJames PoulosProp. 45Aetna

Related Articles

Supreme Court refuses to hook Delta smelt case

  Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court refused to put a hook into an appeal of lower-court actions that shut off water

New dose of Obamacare pain arriving by mail

After nearly four years of covering the Affordable Care Act, more commonly referred to as “Obamacare,” it's hard not to

Controller 2014: 7 reasons why John Perez should quit while he’s behind

The “sunk cost fallacy” — a self-destructive quirk of human behavior — explains why we persist in losing. We hold onto