Tom Steyer passes on U.S. Senate bid

Tom Steyer passes on U.S. Senate bid

Thomas SteyerBillionaire climate change activist Tom Steyer has decided not to run for U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer’s seat in 2016 when she retires.

After two weeks of almost daily speculation of “will he or won’t he,” Steyer announced his decision in a blog post at the country’s top liberal news website.

“I believe my work right now should not be in our nation’s capitol but here at home in California, and in states around the country where we can make a difference,” Steyer wrote at the Huffington Post. “Going forward, I intend to redouble my efforts working with partners and fellow citizens to push for change.”

Steyer also plugged his climate-change agenda, which has become the former hedge fund manager’s second calling after making millions from coal power plants in Australia.

“Some fossil fuel corporations, and the financial interests linked to them, benefit from the activities that contribute to this urgent crisis for our planet — but they are not the ones who pay the price,” Steyer wrote. “The costs are born by all the people; the rewards meted out to the select few. It’s not fair. And it’s not just.”

Focus turns to John Chiang, other Democrats

John Chiang, wikimediaSteyer’s decision to forgo a U.S. Senate run turns the focus to other wealthy liberals, Democratic name-brand candidates and statewide elected officials who are considering a challenge to the only announced Democratic candidate, Attorney General Kamala Harris. Among those top-tier Democrats still considering the race are state Treasurer John Chiang, Rep. Loretta Sanchez, D-Garden Grove, and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

Chiang, a well-respected Democrat with better net approval ratings than Gov.Jerry Brown, would be a natural successor with his reserved, no-nonsense leadership style. He also earned more votes than any other candidate after Brown in last November’s statewide election.

Mainstream buzz for Villaraigosa

A former mayor of the state’s largest city, Villaraigosa earns the most buzz from the political establishment. However, Los Angeles politicians have struggled to win statewide races, undercut by lower voter turnout in Southern California. Villaraigosa went out of his way to court Steyer and his environmentalist supporters.

“Tom Steyer has shown himself to be a real champion for change in his passionate campaign for a cleaner and healthier world,” Villaraigosa said in a statement released to the Associated Press.

Both Villaraigosa and Sanchez would be bolstered by the state’s sizable Latino voting bloc, which turns out in greater numbers during presidential years as compared to gubernatorial election years. Even with low turnout, Latino voters are a considerable political force.

“The dynamics have changed since 1992,” Fabian Nuñez, a former state Assembly speaker, told the Los Angeles Times. Speaking of Latino voters, he said, “We have a role to play.”

Sanchez could be formidable challenger

In particular, Sanchez could be a formidable challenger to Harris and Villaraigosa. As a prominent Latina congresswoman, she’d likely pull female voters from Harris and Latino voters from Villaraigosa. Moreover, Sanchez has a blunt, straight-talking demeanor that could further expose Harris’ more controlled and calculating political approach.

Loretta SanchezIn its 2014 endorsement of Harris for state attorney general, the Los Angeles Times described Harris as “too cautious,” a trait that could hamper her in a contested statewide primary.

“She is also tactical and sometimes too cautious; consider her reluctance to tackle such thorny questions as marijuana legalization and the implications of California’s teacher tenure rules for the quality of education,” the Times wrote in its editorial backing Harris for attorney general. “Both are divisive issues where taking a stand could alienate supporters.”

Sanchez has a remarkably different approach. With a more direct style and off-the-cuff remarks that occasionally get her into trouble, she has managed to create a cult following with her highly-anticipated annual Christmas card, which the Washington Post described as including a “pinup-worthy pose.”

Still 654 days until Election Day

With so much early hype about the 2016 race, it’s easy to forget just how far away the race is. Under California’s Top Two election system, the race could remain competitive until the November general election. As of this writing, Election Day 2016 is 654 days away. That’s light years in the age of 24-hour news and constant social media updates.

In the short term, Steyer’s decision to pass on the race brings a sigh of relief to Harris. As the perceived front-runner, Harris likely would have been on the receiving end of millions of dollars in Steyer attack ads. His decision was also embraced by GOP critics.

“@TomSteyer not running,” tweeted Rob Stutzman, a GOP consultant who advised Meg Whitman’s failed 2010 gubernatorial campaign, “is acknowledgement that political climate change is real.”


Write a comment
  1. maximilian
    maximilian 23 January, 2015, 12:49

    Steyer, “I believe my work right now should not be in our nation’s capitol but here at home in California, and in states around the country where we can make a difference.” Mark my words, that is the last you’ll hear from this left-wing lightweight. He has no positions on anything relevant and that may include his environmental stand…I know, throw enough money at something and people take notice. He will turn and head home.

    Back to Kamala: “She is also tactical and sometimes too cautious; consider her reluctance to tackle such thorny questions as marijuana legalization and the implications of California’s teacher tenure rules for the quality of education.” Absolutely. I’ve said it before, this lady is not a leader and moves only when she has the hand of the unions to guide her and the resultant $$$ that follow. Do not fall for her supposed “attractiveness” (Obama’s comment) nor her false charisma. There ain’t nuttin’ there.

    We stay focused on Chiang and/or Sanchez as they wind their way through the process. And, a hopeful Republican to stir things up.

    Reply this comment
  2. SkippingDog
    SkippingDog 23 January, 2015, 13:28

    Harris will make a fine U.S. Senator for our state.

    Reply this comment
    • maximilian
      maximilian 23 January, 2015, 16:40

      Skippy, Harris may make a fine U.S. Senator for California…but, I doubt it. Here is a quote from her announcement “I will be a fighter for middle class families who are feeling the pinch of stagnant wages and diminishing opportunity. I will be a fighter for our children who deserve a world-class education, and for students burdened by predatory lenders and skyrocketing tuition. And I will fight relentlessly to protect our coast, our immigrant communities and our seniors.” That’s a mouthful for anyone who believes they are a “fighter” for our state and Harris doesn’t reveal much in her bio that she can do any of this. She is going to be put to the test to show her mettle as a fighter…I’ll be the first on her bandwagon if she does.

      Reply this comment
  3. Hondo
    Hondo 23 January, 2015, 22:47

    I’d pay to watch that cat fight between Loretta and Kamala. You don’t think Loretta isn’t gonna bring up Kamala taking high paying jobs from her boyfriend, Willie Brown. That looks to me to be as close to prostitution as you can get.
    The hair pulling starts soon. This is gonna make roller derby seem tame.

    Reply this comment
  4. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 24 January, 2015, 00:47

    Hondo you always worry about trivial nonevents.

    Relax Bro….you’re sounding like Burrow and Dysentary

    Reply this comment
  5. desmond
    desmond 24 January, 2015, 13:14

    Suspect Steyer has some things in closet that he wants to keep there. Considering Kammie(plzslame)was the SF ho for Willie Brown it must be good. Villahozya, What a motley (s)crew!

    Reply this comment
  6. eck
    eck 24 January, 2015, 18:22

    Too bad. Since Barbara Boxer has decided to spare the country further embarrassment and retire from the U.S. Senate, what better face for the Democratic party than a straight, white, gender-conforming male worth $1.6 billion who gave up finance capitalism for cronyism? How ironic would it be, how sweetly delicious, if the first billionaire senator of the twenty-first century was not a Republican but a Democrat who stood against consumers, unions, Canada, and impoverished Third World nations; whose hobbyhorse is at the bottom of public priorities. C’mon Tom, RUN!

    Reply this comment
  7. eck
    eck 24 January, 2015, 18:23

    On second thought, way, way too bad.

    Reply this comment
  8. desmond
    desmond 25 January, 2015, 10:41

    His smoking gun could be population control. Left wingers drool about it to preserve nature for the bugeyed hung frog, but it is a no no for less well off base, Latino, African-Americans.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Independent jurist overseeing Bank of America case

This month federal judge Rya W. Zobel in Boston, Massachusetts, denied a class action lawsuit brought against Bank of America for

CA pot faces bureaucratic, corporate future

With legal recreational marijuana potentially around the corner in November, California’s public and private sector has scrambled to keep up. In

Will bipartisan coalition restrict public safety unions?

During the effort to curb collective bargaining rights for public employees in Wisconsin, Gov. Scott Walker suggested the exemption for