L.A. sportscaster: Chargers may not be welcome

ChargersAfter months of public-relations skirmishing and a few hours of actual discussions between team officials and elected leaders, the future of the San Diego Chargers seems more unsure than ever.

The attorney for the Spanos family, which owns the team — former Clinton administration media aide Mark Fabiani — depicts the city of San Diego as disorganized, unrealistic and “unsophisticated” with its plan to have city voters weigh in via a Dec. 15 special election on whether the city and San Diego County should help the team pay for a new $1.2 billion stadium in Mission Valley. Fabiani points to the unlikelihood that the stadium can readily win necessary environmental approvals and questions the soundness of the funding plan, among several concerns.

City leaders, meanwhile, have gone from quietly seething over what they see as bad-faith negotiating by the team to open displays of disappointment and anger. In a recent radio interview, Mayor Kevin Faulconer accused the team of trying to “run out the clock” by delaying meaningful negotiations while pursuing a stadium project in Carson in southwest Los Angeles County.

Faulconer’s arguments appear to be winning the public-relations war in San Diego County, where social media, letters to the editor and online comments largely reflect the view that the Chargers are going through the motions in their talks with local officials while yearning for a chance to play in the far bigger Los Angeles metro market in a stadium they would jointly own with the Raiders, who want to leave Oakland for L.A.

‘Do you want to be in business with them?’

fred.rogginIf that local perception becomes a national perception, that could hurt the Chargers’ chances of winning support for relocation from three-quarters of the 32 teams, as is required by league rules. The likelihood that this does become conventional wisdom recently got a big boost from an unexpected source: prominent, popular L.A. sportscaster Fred Roggin.

The longtime KNBC Los Angeles broadcaster made big waves recently by denouncing the Chargers and suggesting that they might not be welcome in Los Angeles if they left San Diego in ugly fashion.

“Given the way they’re conducting business, do you want to be in business with them? If you could pick, would you want to be in business with somebody who is spinning out of control, telling everybody a different story, trying to manipulate?” he said in an interview with 1090 AM San Diego. “We’re not stupid people, and would you want to be in business with someone that you couldn’t trust, that every 35 seconds changes his mind, or you are sitting across talking from him comes up with a reason to walk out of the room? I think that’s going to hurt the Chargers in Los Angeles.”

This isn’t the norm for cities which are being eyed by NFL teams for relocation. In the mid-1990s in Nashville, Tennessee, for example, the rumblings of interest from the Houston Oilers in relocating led to an intense campaign meant to show local enthusiasm, capped by bus-loads of fans showing up at the NFL owners’ meeting where the relocation was approved  — with the minimum number of votes.

On Monday, Faulconer had a 45-minute phone conversation with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell about the stadium situation. Details of the conversation weren’t divulged, but the city’s position — that the Chargers don’t want to give San Diego a chance — has been plain since Fabiani ridiculed the proposal for a Dec. 15 stadium vote earlier this month.

For their part, the Chargers have repeatedly made the case to Goodell and other owners that San Diego has been on notice for more than a decade that the team urgently needs a new stadium if it were to remain competitive in a league where new stadiums with lucrative luxury boxes and first-rate facilities have become common. Fabiani says the idea that San Diego never was given a chance is a historical fiction manufactured by city leaders who can’t get their act together.

5 comments

Write a comment
  1. brando
    brando 25 June, 2015, 12:07

    Why should citizens of San Diego pay for a stadium? Do citizens pay for shopping malls, supermarkets, or hardware stores? NO! The Spanos family wants their business to be heavily subsidized by taxpayers. If they want a new stadium the Spanos and private investors can pay for it NOT taxpayers. If they want to leave San Diego let them go. The city is spending too much time on this and wasting taxpayers money.

    Reply this comment
  2. Elmo
    Elmo 25 June, 2015, 14:26

    I agree with brando. The SD taxpayers gave the Chargers $40M once and essentially got nothing in return. Now they want them to do it AGAIN?! I love the Chargers but enough is enough …NO more corporate welfare! The mayor and city council should not base there business decisions on nostalgia anyway. Adios Chargers!

    Reply this comment
  3. ThinkingOutLoud
    ThinkingOutLoud 25 June, 2015, 20:13

    Simple solution. San Diego provides the financing they want, gets 30% of the take!
    The NFL should make it mandatory that in exchange for financing stadiums, those cities get a nice slice of ownership. That way, if the team decides to move in 20 years or so, the city gets bought out at what is then current market value, based on recent team sales, etc.

    Reply this comment
  4. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 26 June, 2015, 07:19

    This is the team that FIRED DREW BREES. Repeat: they FIRED DREW BREES! San Diego taxpayers should string a huge banner on Murphy stadium that says “ADIOS NALGONAS!”

    Reply this comment
  5. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 26 June, 2015, 10:09

    Booze pickled residents have very short memories.

    When the Raiders played in LA many were encouraged to pay competing gangs “protection”, so there cars were not “keyed”, or lose tires in game day parking lots.

    In OC my young son and I were terrified at a Rams vs Bears game…..drunken fan fights in common areas, beer hurling on fans at lower seat levels, cars vandalized in parking lots.

    Is making money on football include a “Mad Max” enviroment?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

Dems Defend Crooked Employees

John Seiler: Sen. Tony Strickland’s bill to strip pensions from public employees who commit financial felonies on the job failed

The book of Jobs

Not sure if you’ve noticed lately, but everybody who’s ever been elected to office, from the lowly dogcatcher to the

Lopsided approval shows SEIU had its way on contract

July 10, 2013 By Chris Reed The assertion that public employee pay and benefits aren’t excessive compared with the private