Bullet train agency still slow to acquire land

CHSRA

Buying land for California’s bullet train remains a slow and contentious process for the state’s high-speed rail agency — but the state’s top rail official said this week he doesn’t expect any “significant” project delays as a result.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority must still acquire rights to nearly 1,000 land parcels in the Central Valley for the first leg of the 800-mile rail network, expected to one day stretch from Sacramento to San Diego.

As of July, it had legal possession of just 300 of the 1,277 necessary parcels for the initial Merced-to-Bakersfield line. This 130-mile portion has been called the “backbone” of the project.

The first 29 miles of that leg is expected to be built by the end of 2017 or early 2018, rail officials said this week.

The agency would need to significantly quicken its pace to open its initial operating section, from Merced to Burbank, by the authority’s estimated 2022 time-frame.

Jeff Morales, the rail authority’s CEO, said in an interview on Wednesday that acquiring land is “a big, big focus.”

In the meantime, he said, construction crews will work at key points along land already acquired until the authority obtains the rest.

“We don’t see a significant impact” to the construction timeline, Morales said. “We built in contingencies.”

Still, Morales said, the authority will issue a revised construction timeline for the first 29 miles this fall. He said that revision should better match up construction work with land recently acquired, but added that he does not expect it will push back the initial project’s end-date.

First stretch under construction

Heavy construction started in Madera in June to build the first of 16 concrete footings for an elevated rail bridge over the Fresno River. That work is part of the Central Valley’s first 29-mile stretch, from Madera to Fresno counties. But even for this earliest of projects, the state has just 223 of 543 parcels needed for construction, which is expected to be complete in 2017.

Landowners have alleged the authority’s property agents are using pressure tactics to speed up the process. They’ve also said they’ve received low-ball offers.

Rail authority officials said this week they’re committed to improving the process and making fair offers. Morales said the authority plans to train and retrain its right-of-way consultants, streamline its internal processes and add more staff.

The state’s pace of acquiring land has picked up in recent months. In March, for example, it had legal possession of just 139 parcels.

“We’re seeing an uptick,” Morales told an authority finance committee on Tuesday in Sacramento. “We do expect, based on specific changes we’ve made, the pace to pick up over the next few months.”

The state has also sped up its use of eminent domain.

In July, it listed 159 parcels under “parcel to condemn,” or to take following a fair market offer. That’s up from 33 under the same listing in March.

Use of eminent domain

In an interview after Tuesday’s board meeting, Dan Richard, chairman of the rail authority’s board, said the agency wants to avoid eminent domain as much as possible. That’s because the associated legal process can take longer than negotiating directly with a landowner, Richard said.

In 2008, California voters authorized nearly $10 billion in bonds for the bullet train project by approving Proposition 1A. The ballot measure said the network would link the state’s urban centers from Sacramento to San Diego, with the San Francisco to Los Angeles connection serving as the central line. Cost estimates for that central line have ranged as high as $96 billion, but were revised downward in recent years to $68 billion.

At the authority’s finance committee meeting, board members urged rail authority staff to find ways to improve and speed up land acquisition. But given the complexities of the project, they said they remained realistic about how quickly the authority could move.

“Major government infrastructure projects all have issues. What we’re trying to do is stay ahead of the issues and correct the issues,” said Tom Richards, the board’s vice chairman and a Fresno resident.

“I don’t think anyone thought this was going to be easy, so I guess we’re all right,” added Mike Rossi, also a board member.

Contact reporter Chris Nichols at [email protected] or on Twitter @ChrisTheJourno

5 comments

Write a comment
  1. Veteran
    Veteran 6 August, 2015, 08:43

    Is there no way to stop this complete waste of money and resources. The end product WILL NOT solve a single transportation problem in the State and WILL NEVER be a profitable venture. Such an unfortunate set of circumstances. Why can’t people see this program for what it is… a legacy program for Brown, and hundreds of payoffs for overpriced products and services involving union jobs. There are so many other infrastructure problems we have… a sort of bullet train solves not of them.

    Reply this comment
    • Ulysse Uhaul
      Ulysse Uhaul 6 August, 2015, 09:34

      Every fool country with bullet trains is a slow growth rate disaster! Spain, France, Japan come to mind-

      But Amazon Prime will flourish as well as USPS with cheap, fast long leg deliveries to spiffy minimum wage worker manned regional centers.

      Look forward to New Years party trains rubbing shoulders drinking Thunderbird with spurious people you once saw at a Quarzite, Az. swap meet…. A jaw dropping horror…..

      Reply this comment
  2. DaveW
    DaveW 6 August, 2015, 10:03

    They wish to avoid eminent domain because it would generate a new round of outrage, galvanize opposition, and invite endless court battles, causing serious delays extending beyond the Brown administration and discouraging future federal involvement.

    Reply this comment
  3. spurwing Plover
    spurwing Plover 5 September, 2015, 22:24

    The Chatanooga Choo Choo,The A-Train,The Walbash Cannonball,The Orange Blossom Special,The City of New Orleans, trains from famous sons but call this the Pork Train becuase its a waste and becuase Moonbeam and this fellow demacrRATS want it

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

San Diego mayor leery of subsidizing stadium, sees political risk

San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s call for another task force to consider how to build the Chargers a new stadium

How new CA voter demographic milestone will affect upcoming elections

  As early ballots arrive in mailboxes this week, Golden State voters will arrive at a symbolic and substantial demographic landmark: a so-called majority-minority electorate.  “For the

Gov. Brown bans plastic bags

Because Gov. Jerry Brown just signed SB270, in July 2016 plastic bags will be banned in stores in California. Paper