CA lawmakers plot CPUC’s demise

2 CPUG LogoThe California Public Utilities Commission may not live to see the next presidential election.

Under a new proposal put forth by Assemblyman Mike Gatto, D-Glendale, the new chairman of the Committee on Utilities and Commerce, the CPUC — long under fire for alleged lapses and mismanagement — “would be broken apart with many of its duties distributed to other state agencies,” U-T San Diego reported. Gatto, the paper detailed, “would place an initiative before voters as soon as November that would remove the commission’s regulatory authority from the California Constitution, effective July 1, 2018.”

Joined in the initiative by Assemblymen Scott Will, R-Santa Clarita, and Marc Levine, D-San Rafael, Gatto lambasted the CPUC’s performance. “The people of California are deeply concerned by the CPUC’s failures in recent years,” he said, according to California Newswire. “You have folks in the Bay Area justifiably concerned after a pipeline explosion, Orange County worried about nuclear waste, Sacramento and the Central Valley on edge with oil trains, and of course, Angelenos deeply concerned after a gas leak.”

The L.A. neighborhood of Porter Ranch has been sent reeling by massive emissions from a recent pipe rupture. The ordeal has added to a full plate of woes for the commission; “response to the San Bruno pipeline explosion in 2010 and the 2012 closure of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station have become the subjects of criminal investigations by state and federal prosecutors,” the Los Angeles Times observed.

Solar squabbles

The CPUC also recently ruffled feathers with a hotly contested vote on the way solar power is metered relative to traditional power. The commission cast its lot with the solar industry in “a dramatic 3-2 vote that saw two commissioners change their minds after a last-minute development favorable to the rooftop solar industry,” as the Desert Sun reported.

“The decision will require Southern California Edison and other utilities to keep paying solar-powered homes and businesses full retail rates for the electricity they generate. In an 11th-hour revision announced by Commission President Michael Picker on Wednesday, it will also ensure that solar customers don’t have to pay for the upkeep of transmission lines. The solar industry cheered that change, even as it prompted two commissioners to vote against a decision they said they otherwise would have supported.”

The move left some aggrieved. State “ratepayer advocates and the utilities, which lose out on electricity sales and some of the infrastructure costs that are bundled into retail rates, say that solar customers put an undue burden on nonsolar customers, who must make up that shortfall,” the New York Times noted.

Mustering support

Faced with news of Gatto’s plan, the commission signaled its hopes to forge ahead on the basis of support from other lawmakers. CPUC spokeswoman Terrie Prosper acknowledged “there is still much to do,” but added, “we look forward to working with the Legislature on any constructive and helpful reform initiative that is put forward,” as the Times reported. “Only by working together on real changes that have the ability to succeed can we make the CPUC stronger and more efficient, and our relationship with the Legislature more productive,” she said in a statement.

One bulwark for the commission has been the governor’s office. “Last year, Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed six bills that would have changed how the commission conducts business,” KQED recalled. “Three bills by now-Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon would have established new oversight measures on the commission.

“Another of the vetoed bills, by state Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, would have tightened rules on private communications between utility executives and state regulators. It also would have tightened conflict-of-interest rules and limited the CPUC president’s powers. And two bills from state Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, would have set performance criteria for the agency and included commission meetings in transparency laws.”

As yet, the station noted, Gov. Brown’s office has not offered comment on the Gatto scheme.


Write a comment
  1. Brandon
    Brandon 9 February, 2016, 07:12

    The CPUC sucks in $1.3 billion a year in taxpayers money to create regulations that hurt the taxpayers and consumers by having us pay more in energy costs. The CPUC has about 1000 employees and it’s costing Californians $1.3 million per employee for them to screw us financially.

    Disband this monstrosity and let free market principles control the energy market. See

    Reply this comment
  2. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 9 February, 2016, 07:46

    We have a whole lot of goverment buracracies in our own Federal goverment that need to be abolished the EPA is just one of them

    Reply this comment
  3. Queeg
    Queeg 9 February, 2016, 18:15


    Think on it…..1000 agressive, uncaring, slimy plutocrats looking for energy wasters, polluters, the usual suspects.

    They are looking at you too- And you probably deserve it…..

    Reply this comment
  4. scojohnson
    scojohnson 11 February, 2016, 09:53

    Start with the CPUC, then move on to the Air Resources Control Board, and I feel like we’ll have the makings of some real cost savings to California residents and businesses and maybe we can get out of our stagnant economy finally.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

East Bay proposal reignites minimum wage fight

When a handful of corporations conspires to fix wages, they face legal action. But for several cities in the San

Tough Talk Can't Hide Tax/Spend Budget

JAN. 11, 2011 By JOHN SEILER In his Jan. 3 Inaugural Address, Gov. Jerry Brown promised us a respite from

$3.9 Million Pension Demands Sunshine

JUNE 9, 2011 By K. Lloyd Billingsley Pension payments such as the $3.9 million in supplemental funds to Samuel Downing,