Legislators Steer Clear of Super Bowl

superbowl 50Though just over 100 miles from the Capitol, state legislators showed no love for Sunday’s Super Bowl between the Denver Broncos and the Carolina Panthers, at least not in person, likely an indictment of exorbitant ticket prices and an acknowledgement of ethics rules barring tickets that expensive from being given as gifts.

Around 70 state legislators’ offices, plus spokespeople for the governor and lieutenant governor, responded to email requests from CalWatchdog about whether or not their bosses attended the game.

While around 50 offices didn’t respond, there was a clear consensus among those who did. With the exception of Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democratic candidate for governor in 2018, no other lawmakers attended (of those who responded).

Cost Prohibitive

Certainly, many legislators either had no interest in going or were committed elsewhere. But the cost of tickets was likely a factor too. USA Today reported that the average resale ticket price was $4,879, while face value ranged from $500 to $3,000 — from nose bleeds to club seats.

A campaign spokesperson confirmed Newsom — who, between him and his wife, is worth at least $8 million according to 2015 disclosures — paid out-of-pocket for his ticket. But the spokesperson could not say how many tickets were purchased, who Newsom was with and how much the ticket(s) cost.

Watch Those Gifts

To have received tickets as gifts would have been problematic for legislators. According to the Fair Political Practices Commission, the maximum value of a gift from a lobbyist is $10 per month, and the maximum value of a gift in other circumstances is $460 from a single source in a calendar year.

The Capitol still smarts from the Kevin Sloat scandal in 2014, where Sloat, a lobbyist, was fined $133,500 by the FPPC for improperly disclosing — or flat out not disclosing — contributions, which included hundreds of dollars worth of tickets to sporting events. It was so widespread that 37 lawmakers received warning letters from the FPPC.

Enjoying The Game On T.V.

Many offices responded that bosses were back in their district last weekend, attending unrelated events or watching the game at private gatherings.

Asms. Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego, and Melissa Melendez, R-Lake Elsinore, had an emoji-laden debate on Twitter on whether the actual game was better than the halftime show:

The two also squared off on whether during the game was the appropriate time to discuss cheerleader pay. Gonzalez said yes, but Melendez argued the game was more important:

According to a spokesperson for the Denver Broncos, their cheerleaders did get paid, although the spokesperson declined to say how much or if it complied with the minimum wage law. A representative from the Carolina Panthers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

1 comment

Write a comment
  1. InYerFace
    InYerFace 12 February, 2016, 22:09

    Glad some of our hapless Calif pols can focus on something besides their left wing agendas, and maybe shoping. Wait a minute, they can’t. Re: the comment on cheerleaders salaries.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

CA tax board owes 27,000 overcharged taxpayers

The California Franchise Tax Board potentially owes millions of dollars to 27,000 taxpayers who were overcharged interest after applying overpayments

Little Hoover A Bust On Long-Term Care

MAY 11, 2011 By K. LLOYD BILLINGSLEY California needs new bureaucracies and a “champion” to oversee long-term care under Medi-Cal,

Gov. Brown signs captive orca ban

  Capping off a protracted political battle focused around animal rights and aquatic entertainment at SeaWorld, the San Diego’s longstanding tourist attraction, Gov.