Bullet train survives lawsuit, but faces new delays

high-speed rail fly californiaA California court may have given the state’s beleaguered high-speed rail project enough rope to hang itself.

After surviving a major lawsuit, the bullet train will still be coming fully online years later than anticipated. “California’s high-speed train has just been delayed by three more years,” Gizmodo noted. “The first leg of the state’s high-speed rail is now set to finish by 2025, not 2022 as planned. This could mean that Hyperloop — the Golden State’s other, even more futuristic transit plan — could beat the bullet train to the station.”

Delays arose as a result of the dizzying challenge of navigating Los Angeles County’s mountains, which ring the city of L.A.’s basin. “The high-speed rail authority thought it could do it by 2022, but now they admit it will likely take three years longer,” The Verge observed. “The mountainous passage outside L.A. won’t be built until the end of the schedule, while the San Francisco leg of the project will be built first.”

Day in court

The train recently prevailed in Sacramento County Superior Court, where a judge “ruled that the allegations in the suit were ‘not ripe for review,’ finding that opponents of the project offered no evidence that the state rail authority would not comply at some point with the restrictions as it continues to plan the project,” the Los Angeles Times reported.

Judge Michael Kenny determined that the train couldn’t be halted because “too many unknown variables” hung over the project, which was alleged by Kings County and several farmers to have violated restrictions voters supported when approving the train in 2008. But officials did not land a clean victory. “The ruling appeared to leave open the door for the lawsuit to resume in the future,” according to the Times, leaving a smaller but stubborn cloud over the ambitious and costly project.

Raising the bar

What’s more, the ruling held “the rail agency to strict compliance with some of the bond act requirements that will be difficult to meet,” the Times observed.

“The 2008 bond act, which provided $9 billion for the high-speed rail program, required that the train system would have to be financially viable, allow the operation of trains every five minutes in each direction, operate without a subsidy, have all the funds identified for an operating segment before the start of construction and travel between Los Angeles and San Francisco in two hours and 40 minutes, among other things.”

Cost concerns have continued to dog the train. The agency “reduced projected capital costs from $67.6 billion to $64.2 billion, but the project’s overall price tag has more than doubled since voters in 2008 approved $9 billion in bonding to cover one-third of its cost,” PD&D reported. “The state plans to pay $21 billion to cover the first leg, between San Jose and California’s Central Valley, but that amount is dependent on projections of fees for emissions of greenhouse gases. The remainder of the line, meanwhile, will require billions from private investors — who would likely need to see a profit before committing — and billions more from the federal government.” Congressional Republicans, including members of California’s delegation, have expressed disinterest in bailing out the train.

Seizing the initiative

Some advocates for scuttling the train entirely have taken advantage of the legal and political situation to push for a new ballot initiative that would do just that. The measure would tap approved train dollars to build new reservoirs. Supporters have had to scramble “to gather enough signatures to qualify the measure for the November ballot,” according to the San Jose Mercury News. “A poll in January by Stanford University’s Hoover Institution found that 53 percent of Californians support killing the high-speed rail project and using the unspent money on water projects, while 31 percent do not.”

7 comments

Write a comment
  1. Standing Fast
    Standing Fast 11 March, 2016, 12:58

    The more the State pursues this Quixotic dream, the more idiotic it seems to me. Are the fans of high-speed rail really that stupid or do they just think we are?
    I thank God for small favors. The longer this is delayed the less likely it will ever come to pass.

    Reply this comment
  2. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 11 March, 2016, 15:00

    I can’t wait to ride the BB Gun Train!

    Reply this comment
  3. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 11 March, 2016, 17:18

    I have a GREAT USE for this boondoggle white elephant! We can strap Teddy Steals to the front of it, lay the tracks out into the Pacific Ocean and then let her rip!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Highest and best use!

    https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/img_7496_1016707553.jpg?quality=100&strip=all

    Reply this comment
  4. ricky65
    ricky65 13 March, 2016, 09:52

    So the ballot language of Prop 1A says the train ‘system would have to be financially viable, allow the operation of trains every five minutes in each direction, operate without a subsidy, have all the funds identified for an operating segment before the start of construction and travel between Los Angeles and San Francisco in two hours and 40 minutes, among other things…”
    None of these conditions are not now, or ever will be in compliance with the law.
    Yet somehow this D-Rat appointed judge has determined that the current project complies with the ballot language and the law.
    There are only two possibilities how this can be possible:
    1. A large manila envelope from the unions and D-Rat supporters of this fiasco was slipped under the door of the judge’s chambers.
    2. These same people apparently have pictures of the judge with either farm animals or little kids- or both.

    Reply this comment
  5. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 15 March, 2016, 09:35

    So how much farmland will they use Entimate Domain to confiscate so they can build their pork train railroad?

    Reply this comment
  6. Ronald
    Ronald 21 March, 2016, 13:44

    Shrinking ridership on public transportation may be a sign of things to come for the Bullet Train and the States’ optimistic ridership projections to justify the project. The State is only required to build the high speed rail, then turn it over to an operator. If the high speed rail ever gets built, the completed project will be doomed to failure even before it’s turned over to an operator.

    Since state law says that the system MUST OPERATE WITHOUT A TAXPAYER SUBSIDY, the end results may necessitate higher fares per mile, compared with other similar rail systems worldwide, this will adversely affect ridership projections. Thus, it’s understandable that an investment in the bullet train provides significant ROI risks to that invested capital.

    The bullet train will be competing against the multitude of airports in CA as well as the constantly developing technologies that are affecting the way we do business. Just like the land phones that have become obsolete as a result of cell phone technologies, future travel needs may be impacted in the coming decades as a result of the ever growing virtual world.

    Driving or flying from a multitude of airports can be done at virtually any time of day, but the inflexibility of how many train departure times would be available from a limited number of trains would impact the convenience factor offered by cars and planes and thus also adversely affect train ridership. The snowballing effect of lower ridership would be higher fares for those that do use the train as there would be no state subsidies available. Lower ridership would further impact the ROI risks for invested capital.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply


Tags assigned to this article:
bullet trainhigh-speed railHyperloopMichael Kenny

Related Articles

New PM Abbott dumps Aussie carbon tax

Last weekend Australians voted the ruling Labor Party from power. The Opposition Coalition led by Tony Abbott of Australia's conservative

L.A. proposal: That’s a pension tax — not a pothole tax

This proposal — allegedly from Los Angeles bureaucrats but almost certainly from new L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti — got the

CA bans wildlife hunting contests

Wile E. Coyote is smirking. Despite a robust and thriving population, coyotes have just received an unprecedented degree of legal