Proposed pilot program could replace Caltrans with counties

Caltrans is on notice: A new bill looks at a life where counties would fix roads themselves.

Responding to years of mismanagement and voter frustration with state roads, coupled with successful transportation programs administered in his home county, Sen. John Moorlach is pushing a measure that would create a five-year pilot program empowering two counties to assume the responsibility of Caltrans in their jurisdictions.

John Moorlach1That responsibility would include the operation, maintenance and improvements of all state highways in their counties, with Caltrans relinquishing all responsibility and funding. The two counties would volunteer, with one chosen from the north and one from the south.

Moorlach said eliminating Caltrans could be an eventual byproduct of the bill, but the purpose of the bill is to empower counties to handle work in their areas at a lower cost with less overhead, compared to Caltrans which has a history of cost overruns.

“How can you go to people and say you want to spend more money on roads when you’ve got a Department of Transportation that’s a mess,” the Costa Mesa Republican told CalWatchdog in an interview.

The bill will be heard on April 12 in the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee.

Voters want better roads

Almost seven of 10 voters say more money should be spent on the maintenance of roads, highways and bridges, according to a Public Policy Institute of California poll released this month.

Moorlach said more funding could help roads, pointing to counties’ ability to tax themselves. In conservative Orange County, where he served as supervisor, voters twice passed a temporary increase in sales tax to widen highways.

“If you want to tax yourself, do it in your county,” Moorlach said. “But don’t give it to Caltrans for crying out loud. What a mistake.”


Road constructionThe bill was introduced last month, but has resurfaced after a scathing report on the maintenance division from state Auditor Elaine M. Howle earlier this month alleging Caltrans mismanaged funds.

The audit highlighted Caltrans spending $250,000 on a budget model that it didn’t use and then telling the Legislature it was implementing the budget model. Apparently, the budget model was scrapped after it made a recommendation Caltrans didn’t like, such as the reduction of staff by 100 people in its Los Angeles district.

“Instead of trying to determine why the model produced such allocations, the maintenance division decided to abandon it,” Howle wrote in a summary.

The audit also called out Caltrans for not allocating funds by need and not using funds to hold counties accountable for poorly maintained districts and for not promptly performing certain maintenance work.

In a response addressed to Asm. Freddie Rodriguez, the chair of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, Malcolm Dougherty, Caltrans director, said the auditor’s office took too narrow of a look at Caltrans’ practices, but acknowledged that the language to the Legislature “mischaracterized” the way funds were allocated. Dougherty apologized.


Write a comment
  1. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 30 March, 2016, 12:44

    We need to replace Moonbeam with someone with more common sense which is a very rare bird in Sacramento were stuck with the turkeys

    Reply this comment
  2. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 30 March, 2016, 15:49

    OK, I am worried about seesaw, she is not posting her usual drivel and I think she may be in the old ladies home and in need of some friends, who has her email??

    Reply this comment
    • Ulysses Uhaul
      Ulysses Uhaul 30 March, 2016, 18:32

      Get back to your pretzel salt box station in Randsburg. You need this valuable and pivotable career opportunity badly.

      Reply this comment
  3. Mamamia
    Mamamia 30 March, 2016, 18:56

    How many times have we been stopped on a road with people holding up stop signs, a “follow me” truck leads you past a ditch being worked on by one of two guys with 15 others in their trucks or standing around watching? The waste of money is shameful. Those guys make 100K a year!

    Reply this comment
    • Operator
      Operator 31 March, 2016, 15:47

      Im an operator for caltrans in the maintenance dept. I gross 4236.00 a month, not quite 100k lol and take home net 2600.00 to 2700.00. So quit spreading lies please. The work zone is created for safety, and it may be a small task that needs attention. So to ensure we get home to our families after repairs or cleanup of public roadways. The last thing we need is the traveling public loose and complacent where we are working. Just because you don’t understand what’s going on in the zone, please don’t assume its just another waste of funds.

      Reply this comment
  4. talltalk
    talltalk 31 March, 2016, 05:39

    decentralize!!!! central control is communism. welcome local control whenever possible. costs will drop like a rock with competive, open bid, non- auto renewel contracts.

    Reply this comment
  5. fletch92131
    fletch92131 2 April, 2016, 07:42

    I’ve really enjoyed reading about the recent Georgia city, Sandy Springs, and how they outsourced everything,, except police and fire services,, saving tons of money and limiting the bureaucracy of Fulton County Georgia.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

UCs use Brown agreement for salary boost

Its budgetary outlook finally clear, the University of California system has pivoted quickly from planning to spending. With negotiations concluded between

Solar panels might not help home values

Putting solar panels on home roofs is the rage in California with all our sunshine. But it might not help

Rail Program In Deep Doo-Doo

MAY 24, 2011 You know a massive government program is in trouble when even its hand-picked “working group” of insiders