Why subsidize millionaires and billionaires?

Here’s two cheers for Democratic Assemblywoman Lori Saldaña of San Diego. She’s introduced a new law that would ban stadium subsidies from taxpayers for the NFL — or any sports league — if it a “blackout” rule. Under the NFL’s current rule, if a game isn’t sold out within 72 hours of kickoff, broadcasts of it are blacked out for a 75-mile radius around the stadium.

I don’t give her three cheers — withholding one — because the ban should be comprehensive, whether or not leagues have blackout rules or not.

Today’s major-league owners are billionaires, with most of the NFL teams by themselves worth more than $1 billion.

The median salary in the NFL currently is $770,000.

Julius Peppers of the Carolina Panthers gets $16.7 million a year.

So, why should taxpayers subsidize the NFL? Supposedly, a city “loses” something if it doesn’t have an NFL team. Well, when I came to Southern California in 1987, we had two NFL teams: the Raiders and the Rams. Both left. I haven’t missed them even for a second.

If these millionaires and billionaires want new stadiums, they should pony up the money themselves.

— John Seiler

(Note: this was corrected to reflect that the bill would ban such subsidies for all leagues with blackouts, not just the NFL. — J.S.)

Related Articles

12,744 new laws signed by Brown

Oct. 2, 2012 Katy Grimes: Whenever someone tells me what a lousy governor Arnold Schwarzenegger was, I remind then that

Fight flares over ‘realignment,’ Prop. 47 effects on crime

The battle over state policies that some call soft on crime and some see as humane and thoughtful appears to

Oct. 3 key deadline for CA response to anti-bullet-train ruling

The implications of Sacramento Superior Court Judge Michael Kenny's Aug. 16 ruling that the California High-Speed Rail Authority had failed