LA to shift sidewalk burden

JULY 6, 2010


As the infrastructure crumbles throughout California, the sidewalks laid down during the first half of the last century have no immunity.

Initially responsible for the slab of concrete in front of their homes, Los Angeles residents saw this change in the 1970s as city government started picking up the tab for broken walkways. This is set to change as the Los Angeles City Council is expected to pass an ordinance in a few weeks reverting sidewalk upkeep back to the property owner.

In an era of cash-strapped government, Los Angeles cannot afford to keep maintaining 10,000 miles of sidewalk at a cost of about $10 million a year, said Councilman Bernard Parks. About 4,000 miles currently need repair.

“Everybody pays enough in taxes,” Parks said. “Most of that money goes to core responsibilities – public safety like police and fire, and things like libraries. It really gets down to whether fixing a sidewalk is a core responsibility.”

When news of the issue surfaced two months ago, the plan was met with a rousing protest from community leaders and talk show hosts who complained the city’s astronomical tax base should be enough to pay for repairs.

“We have the second highest utility user tax in the state here at 10 percent,” Kris Vosburgh, executive director of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, said of Los Angeles. “For that kind of money, one would think you would get something other than just the usual services.”

Los Angeles talk show host John Kobylt of AM radio’s KFI640 lamented in a broadcast that the tax money was going to “union whores” – the city employees, which are the highest paid in the nation. “And I didn’t ask for that tree to be planted there,” Kobylt said of a parkway tree in front of his Los Angeles house.

But these complaints apparently have fallen on deaf ears as it appears that a majority of the council members support the ordinance, which is currently under review by the City Attorney’s Office. The issue was first broached in 2007 with 11-0 support when the council asked the city attorney to draft the ordinance.

“Some people are very vocal about not being responsible,” Parks said. “These are the same ones who are complaining, ‘When are you going to fix my sidewalk?’ “

If the ordinance passes, property owners will have three years before they have to start paying for repairs and accept legal liability for accidents. This time period will be used to educate the public and create a notification system for requiring repairs, which could cost anywhere from $500 to $5,000. Parks said the city will retain some of the liability for injuries on broken sidewalks.

He added that most cities throughout the state require property owners to maintain upkeep of their sidewalks and Los Angeles will be no different.

A sampling of cities such as San Francisco, Sacramento and San Diego, revealed this to be true. In fact, San Francisco even goes as far as to employ sidewalk inspectors who are responsible for canvassing the city in search of violators. Offenders are given a notice that requires repairs in 30 days, which could include grinding down tree roots and replacing missing sewer vent covers.

“This has been the law forever, LA has been nice and done this” for property owners, said San Francisco Department of Public Works spokeswoman Christine Falvey.

Vosburgh of Howard Jarvis doesn’t see it that way.

“The sidewalks in the neighborhoods are atrocious,” he said. “I’ve seen places with an 18-inch gap between the sidewalk and the dirt because of a tree root. The state of disrepair has been left to the city and now they want to shift that to the homeowner. We’re seeing them raise taxes and charges just because they can.”


Write a comment
  1. Tylerle13
    Tylerle13 7 July, 2010, 12:01

    What the hell is the infrastructure maint. money being spent on? They are paying police overtime to be at the Michael Jackson Funeral & the Lakers riots, but they are so cash strapped that people have to pay to fix the sidewalks? They want more power to control every little aspect of peoples lives, but they cannot even efficiently handle the basic purposes of a government. What a joke.

    Reply this comment
  2. Sue Castillo
    Sue Castillo 9 July, 2010, 08:39

    It was interesting to read about San Francisco’s approach to this – good research. I’d like to know more: how long has this been the law there, and how is it working? Are any people losing their homes (due to lawsuit awards against them)? However, I don’t see how the City could keep from being named in the lawsuit as well, as the City has been maintaining (or failing to maintain) the sidewalks for decades here. Lawyers will always go after the deep pockets…the City, not individual homeowners. If this goes forward, it should be accompanied by another law, requiring pedestrians to take responsibility for paying attention to their movements, instead of expecting compensation when they trip over a 2″ sidewalk joint irregularity. I would also like to see the city make sidewalk repairs more affordable, and waive inspection/permit fees for homeowner repairs. Going a step further, the City should allow homeowners to opt into a City-led pavement repair contract, in order to benefit from the City’s ability to bargain effectively for the best price on a large contract.

    Reply this comment
  3. LA Homeowner
    LA Homeowner 9 July, 2010, 10:19

    If I am compelled to pay for repairing my sidewalk, then I reserve the right to control that sidewalk- it’s my property. If repairs are needed, I will select the contractor, not pay the bloated city rates. If it’s my sidewalk on my lot (and it is my lot) then I will select who gets to use it, and it will not be open to the general public any more than my front yard is.

    Reply this comment
  4. Tesa Becica
    Tesa Becica 10 July, 2010, 15:53

    The article fails to mention how much control the homeowners in those “regulated” cities maintain. We have no control over what type of trees are planted, and then are responsible for what damage they do? This is not logical. If Los Angeles quit being a sanctuary city, we would have plenty of money for our government to run properly!

    Reply this comment
  5. LA property owner
    LA property owner 12 July, 2010, 00:57

    If this is approved, what prevents the city in the future from extending the homeowners resposibility to mainataining the pavement all the way to the centerline of the road, then the infrastrucutre underneath as well!
    Sidewalks is used by the public without control or restrictions from property owners similar to paved roads. Its maintainance should always be the responsibility of the city not the homeowner!

    Reply this comment
  6. Bay Area Homeowner
    Bay Area Homeowner 5 February, 2012, 09:45

    The precident is pretty clear and well established. Cities have implicitly taken ownership of sidewalks by the original installation, design, maintenance and oversight policies. Now – they’re feeling the pinch of a tighter economy and would like to shift that responsibility to homeowners – despite years of acting, in every way imaginable, to the contrary. State of disrepair is the responsibility of the current owners. I do not see how cities can suddenly whip out (to use a phrase from Animal House) “..a little known codicil..” in hopes of undoing decades of their own actions and liability.

    Reply this comment
  7. Mary Patterson
    Mary Patterson 21 August, 2014, 10:29

    I injured myself severely on an uplifted sidewalk in Los Angeles. Who is responsible? The homeowner and the city ignored the problem and I’m suffering with permanent injuries.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

State owes counties $22 million in taxes, refuses to pay

April 16, 2013 By Dave Roberts If you decide not to pay your taxes, you could face stiff penalties, seizure

CA ‘anchor baby’ debate goes national

Republican presidential candidates were drawn deeper into the immigration controversies centered on California, as Donald Trump’s leading opponents sought a

Economist: Taxpayers may pay for $15 billion Delta tunnels

California taxpayers may be liable for picking up part of the $15 billion cost of the proposed Delta tunnels project,