Can California GOP Get Its Mojo Back?

NOV. 8, 2010

By JOHN SEILER

The Nov. 2 election was almost a total wipe-out for California Republicans. They even lost the 28th state Senate District to incumbent Jenny Oropeza, who died two weeks earlier.

At the state level, they were smashed in every race except attorney general. Republican Steve Cooley barely leads as counting goes on. Yet he should have easily beaten opponent Kamala Harris, the far-left Democratic district attorney from San Francisco who opposes the popular death penalty.

Is there any hope for this party regaining its running legs? Or should it be led to the elephant graveyard like in one of those old Tarzan movies?

“They have nowhere to go but up,” Jack Pitney told me; he’s Roy P. Crocker Professor of American Politics at Claremont McKenna College and author of “The Art of Political Warfare” and other books. “That’s the optimistic way of looking at it. The party is in about as tough a shape as you can imagine.”

Voters passed Proposition 25, which dropped from two-thirds to a majority the threshold for passing a state budget. “That means they’re cut out of the budget process,” Pitney added. “They don’t have any significant leverage in the Legislature. Interest groups don’t have any reason to give them the time of day.”

He said that there are two kinds of contributions to political campaigns: Access money and belief money. Access money is to buy influence; Republicans won’t be getting much of that. Belief money is because the politician advances something the donor believes in. “Republicans now will have to motivate people with their beliefs. They will have to make arguments to persuade people to move away from the Democrats.”

Hasta la vista, Arnold

One of the Republicans’ few pieces of good news, Pitney said, is that fellow Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger soon will be leaving the governor’s throne. “Schwarzenegger has essentially divorced the Republican Party,” Pitney added. “It’s one of those divorces that’s OK with the wronged party,” meaning almost every other Republican.”

Anther sign of hope is the defeat of Proposition 27, which would have canceled the 2008 redistricting reform voters passed. After redistricting next year eliminates the severe gerrymandering imposed in 2001, in 2012 Republicans might have a chance to pick up a few more seats in the Legislature, “although it won’t allow them to capture a majority” in either the Assembly or the state Senate, Pitney figured. “Then they could start rebuilding” the party and its power in the state Capitol.

Billionaire losers

California Republicans haven’t done well with the mega-millionaire and billionaire business candidates they have put up for statewide office. Michael Huffington lost a race for U.S. Senate in 1994. Bill Simon lost the governor’s race in 2002 to Democrat Gray Davis. Both Steve Poizner and Meg Whitman lost in 2010 for the governor’s office. And Carly Fiorina lost her bid for a U.S. Senate seat against Barbara Boxer.

Of course, the exception is Arnold Schwarzenegger, who won in 2003 and 2006. But his first race was the freakish recall. And in 2006, his re-election came in the peak year of the real-estate boom, with the state flush with boom tax money a year before everything went bust.

Moreover, voters didn’t actually vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger, but for the Terminator, Conan the Barbarian, John Matrix, Mark Kaminsky, Dutch, Ben Richards,  Capt. Ivan Danko, Jack Slater, Harry Tasker, Mr. Freeze, et al. They’ll all be leaving come January.

“There’s nothing wrong with a billionaire running for office, if the billionaire is a competent politician,” Pitney said. “His policies were another thing, but Nelson Rockefeller, the New York governor and politician, was a gifted natural politician, who knew how to work a crowd. It’s not enough to have millions. You also have to have political skill. That’s something money can’t buy.”

The contrast is unavoidable with Whitman, whose persona everywhere was described as cold and aloof. And that was known before she was nominated.

To find out what Republicans specifically can do to get their mojo back, I asked two Orange County Republican activists, Bob Pace, who is a former Young Republican and in the 1990s was the associate representative of the executive committee of the California Republican Party.

And Allan Bartlett, an elected member of the Orange County Republican Central Committee from the 70th Assembly District.  He’s also a candidate for the first vice chairman position on the party’s executive committee next term.

Arnold’s aftermath

“I don’t think he really hurt the party that badly,” Pace told me. “Most don’t think he is really a Republican. I have called him a ‘European Republican.’ Not to be too cute, but I think that says it all. He is an economic moderate/conservative without any religious upbringing or belief. He seems to be completely secular. Personally, I think  he will be a footnote in history.

“The real damage was done by Pete Wilson,” Republican governor from 1991 to 1998. “He was against Proposition 187,” which cut off funding for illegal immigrants, “until he figured he needed it to gain votes. He wanted to win, flip-flopped on the issue, and rode it to a true pyrrhic victory. The people I knew told me at the time that this was going to ruin the Republican party for years.”

Bartlett disagreed. “Schwarzenegger has done untold damage to the GOP brand,” he told me. “People look at our elected leaders of what the party represents. Unfortunately for Republicans, we chose a person like Arnold Schwarzenegger as a our standard bearer in 2003 and 2006.  Now it is costing us dearly.”

Are more billionaires the answer?

Should the Republican Party keep nominating super-rich candidates from outside politics?

“I’m not prejudiced, John!” Pace said. “I have no problem with rich people wanting to run. It is just that we need someone with a little ‘passion,’ in the classical meaning of the word, to run — even if they are rich.

“What we’ve gotten are some people who got a little lucky in life and think they can just throw their hat in the ring and others will shrink. Reagan didn’t act like that. He was really passionate about America and people. He saw himself as one of the people.”

Bartlett said, “This is a classic case of money not being everything in politics. It’s readily apparent that Meg did not receive much value from all the dollars she paid out to consultants.  California voters have rejected these types of super-rich candidates over the last 20 years: Michael Huffington, Whitman, Carly Fiorina, Steve Westly, Al Checchi, Bill Simon, etc.”

Is there a future for Republicans in California?

After Tuesday’s wipe-out, does the Republican Party have a future in California?

“The California Republican Party leadership should all tender their resignations effective immediately,” Bartlett told me. “If Republicans can’t win any statewide offices in a year where we had a lot of electoral factors in our favor, I’m not optimistic about the party’s future going forward in California.”

“Yes, it does have a future,” Pace told me, being more optimistic. “If the leaders start listening to people who are good at their job, have produced results, and have good ideas. Instead, they remind me of the Scottish House of Lords in ‘Braveheart.’ They worry more about gaining power in the party than they do gaining the power of California. They actually think that, ‘If I can just play enough games to get ahead in the California Republican Party, then afterward I can take over the world.

“They need to take the message to the Hispanic community, to all minority communities. Basically every small businessperson should be a Republican. Every churchgoer pretty much should be a Republican. I am sure the party will say they have taken the message to these communities. But all you have to do is look around and see that isn’t true. ”

John Seiler is a reporter and analyst for CalWatchDog.com. His email: [email protected].

No comments

Write a comment
  1. stevefromsacto
    stevefromsacto 8 November, 2010, 19:27

    The problem is that the Republican Party in California is the party of exclusion. Anyone who refuses to toe the ultra-right-wing line: 1) No tax increase ever, no matter the need or the circumstances, 2) put all illegals in jail or send them all back to Mexico (no mention of who will pay for all that); 3) Prop. 8 forever, etc. will find his or her head on a stick.

    Tom Campbell would have been elected U.S. Senator. There is no doubt in my mind about that. But he couldn’t get past the right wing Republican death squad.

    The majority of the California electorate are moderates. They want people in office who will work together to solve our state’s problems. Year after year, election after election, they say NO to the right-wing agenda. Yet the GOP goes on and on with its failed strategy of addition by subtraction.

    Reply this comment
  2. Benito
    Benito 8 November, 2010, 21:23

    The Republicans are so funny, when the economy is good you say let’s all celebrate “Cinco de Mayo, my brothers” but when the economy is down “it’s all your fault, you damn immigrant”.

    The GOP has gone on a nationwide rant in proposing and passing several anti-immigration legislation (that our US Courts continue to strike down) and have continue to blame the immigrant for the flat economy or worse.

    Plus the more radical of the GOP are now attacking our Constitution (with all Amendments), and the Declaration of Independence, in their crazy notion of wanting to take away rights that all of us take for granted in their misguided attempt to garner some much needed votes, they really are fools, and leading the GOP towards obscurity because they are no longer a party of ideas, just of empty suits.

    When most Americans (of Latin America roots) went to the polls this November we all remembered who stood with us and who stood against us, so trying to make amends now is somewhat funny, but go ahead, you did not change our minds. Your hate made you do it, and you found out that you reap what you have sown. I wonder what Abraham Lincoln would say about todays GOP, he unlike the current GOP was a man of ideas.

    Reply this comment
  3. John Seiler
    John Seiler Author 9 November, 2010, 09:59

    Steve,

    The Republican Party now is effectively dead in California, so enjoy you monopoly.

    And as to Tom Campbell winning against Boxer, when Campbell ran for the U.S. Senate in 2000 against DiFi, he lost by 19 points — and by 15 points even in his own congressional district. And that was another Republican year nationally.

    As to Prop. 8, it won because blacks and Latinos backed it overwhelmingly, even though they’re overwhelmingly Democratic. (In any case, same-sex “marriage” is an absurdity; it doesn’t exist.)

    Reply this comment
  4. David in Irvine
    David in Irvine 9 November, 2010, 14:16

    Disjointed thoughts: Remember, although we “vote”, the politicians choose whom to represent. Democrats have a farm system- look at where Gray Davis and Nunez, Villar, and Perez earned their stripes… Can you imagine Meg Whitman taking her fortune and working as a staffer in Sac-town in order to build a rep. and activist base to run for statewide office? The GOP is at a disadvantage- the Dems love the gov’t. and spend their entire lives in it or in close proximity to it… California can look to two potential models of one-party rule in a democracy: SF/NYC-style 3rd world livability but utterly hostile to the middle class (we’re on our way), or Detroit-style kleptocracy and ruin. Has either been tried on such a large scale in the US?

    Reply this comment
  5. John Seiler
    John Seiler 9 November, 2010, 19:31

    David,

    You made some great points. The California Republican “farm” system seems to be to raise young hacks to leech off rich candidates, who then lose.

    Reply this comment
  6. David in Irvine
    David in Irvine 10 November, 2010, 11:12

    It also points out an unintended consequence of term limits for a minority party. Dems can meander their way through the power structure by holding various elective offices (hello Karen Bass), appointments and private sector jobs based on access and influence. Imagine if Villaraigoso hadn’t termed out- he’d still be speaker and could be held responsible for his part of the current fiscal mess (not that his constituency would hold him responsible, again hello Karen Bass). Once a younger GOP rep. like Chuck Devore gets termed out, what are his options if he wants to stay in the game? A principled figure from the opposition, even with his power diminished by Prop. 25, could at least remain in the legislature shouting “fire” while the Dems. continue their Nero impersonations.

    Reply this comment
  7. Charles Sainte Claire P.E. and proud of it
    Charles Sainte Claire P.E. and proud of it 10 November, 2010, 11:48

    My advice to Republicans. Push district boundaries drawn by unbiased people who want them to make sense, not make them “safe”. Make term limits longer to encourage the development of sensible compromise. Quit foaming the the mouth, you have to have a believable plan. California wants jobs, less taxes and less oppressive regulation of business. Quit shooting yourselves in the foot.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment



Related Articles

Proposition 16 Hidden Intent?

Could there be a hidden intent behind the PG&E sponsored Proposition 16? Peter Darbee, chairman and CEO of PG&E, is

Lily-white enviro groups: Snail darters > minorities

March 26, 2013 By Chris Reed So the Washington Post has a 1,500-word-plus analysis of why leaders and members of environmental

CA Dems Hold Looters' Convention

MAY 2, 2011 By JOHN SEILER H.L. Mencken called elections “advanced auctions of stolen goods.” That certainly was true of