CA Freebies Enrich Low-Wage Workers
NOV. 29, 2010
By WAYNE LUSVARDI
Contrary to half-truths by both liberals who believe the minimum wage is a poverty wage or conservatives who believe it creates more unemployment and sends jobs overseas, at least in California minimum wage is a ticket to enjoying more disposable income than the median wage earning family — not through the mandated boost in wages, but because the minimum wage opens the door to myriad welfare programs paid for by tax dollars. Minimum wage is a ticket to qualifying for a number of aid programs that boosts a family’s expendable income to almost 25 percent more than a California family earning the median income who do not qualify for any income assistance or tax credits.
A working family of four with one wage earner at $8 per hour in California has 23 percent more expendable income, after receiving an earned income tax credit, food stamps, free school lunches, Medicaid and Section 8 housing assistance, than the same family earning the median income of $61,154 ($28 per hour) where an employer pays for the majority of medical insurance costs.
The stimulus for this conclusion is a Web post floating around the Internet claiming that a working family has more disposable income from a minimum wage job plus all the qualifying entitlements than if the same family was making the median income.
This writer tried to replicate this finding to see if was valid but with more refined and documented data from California. A comparison was made in California of a family of four with one working parent and two school age children living in a two–bedroom apartment based on varying income levels and assumptions:
1. Part Time Worker – Working one week per month at minimum wage ($8/hour) assuming qualifying for free childcare, earned income tax credit, food stamps, school lunches, and Section 8 rental housing assistance.
2. Minimum Wage Worker – Working full time at minimum wage ($8/hour) assuming qualifying for free child care, earned income tax credit, food stamps, school lunches, and Section 8 rental housing assistance.
3. 50 percent Median Income Earner – Earning 50 percent of the median household income ($14/hour) assuming an employer pays the majority of medical insurance costs and household qualifies for earned income tax credit.
4. Median Income Wage Earner – Earning the median household income ($28/hour) assuming an employer pays the majority of medical insurance costs.
It was assumed that all four families lived in a two-bedroom apartment in San Diego County where the county median household income ($62,820) is approximately the same as the state median income ($61,154). Rents, utility costs, transportation costs and household expenses were based on San Diego County data from the county housing authority and from the California Budget Project – 2010: How Much Does It Cost To Raise a Family in California? (see link at bottom). The table below summarizes the results of this exploratory study. Links on the sources of data relied upon are found at the bottom.
| Money earned in a year | $4,000 1 week/month @ $8/hour |
$16,000
@$8/hour |
$30,500 | $61,154 |
| Percent of Median Income | 6.5% | 26% | 50% | 100% |
| Payroll & Federal Income Taxes | ($0) | ($0) | ($0) | ($3,531) |
| Child Care Cost 2-school age children |
$0 | $0 | ($5,337) 17.5% |
($10,792) 17.5% |
| California Income Tax | 1% $0 |
2% $0 |
6% ($324) |
9.3% ($1,366) |
| Earned Income Tax Credit | $1,610 | $5,036 | $3,126 | 0 |
| Food Stamps CalFRESH |
$8,016 | $8,016 | 0 | 0 |
| School Lunch Program (NSLP) | $2,371
|
$2,371
|
0 | 0 |
| Medicaid CHIP *** | $0 | $0 | ($2,856) | ($2,856) |
| Rent Cost with Section 8 Rent Subsidy ** | ($1,450) ** | ($4,350) **
|
($13,584)
|
($18,000) |
| Utility Bill Cost with Subsidy | ($362) | ($1,450) | ($1,200) | ($1,200) |
| Transportation | ($324) | ($1,296) | ($3,564) | ($3,564) |
| Misc. Expenses | ($479) | ($479) | ($479) | ($479) |
| Total Expendable Income | $13,382 | $23,848 | $6,282 | $19,366 |
| Percent of Expendable Income of Median Family | 69% | 123% | 32% | 100% |
| Source: Wayne Lusvardi 11-23-2010 *** – employee’s share of medical insurance |
||||
Minimum wage can’t be looked at in isolation from the full cafeteria of income assistance programs for which it serves as an entry pass. Singularly looking at minimum wage is like finding the tree and missing the forest.
When Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger called for state employees to be paid the minimum wage in lieu of their salaries to cure the state budget deficit he must have known this would have increased the welfare burden in California, albeit possibly shifting it onto the federal government. State employees and unions may not have realized that minimum wage guaranteed more disposable income than the median income wage earner, albeit without all the lucrative retirement benefits and Cadillac medical insurance coverage.
Given the symbiotic relationship between minimum wage and the whole bureaucratic vending machine of income assistance programs, California’s perpetual budget deficits may have been even larger if the number of minimum hourly wage workers in California had not fallen from over 300,000 in 1998 to about 75,000 in 2007.
It may have been no coincidence that The Cash For Clunkers program offered a $4,500 tax rebate to trade in an old car, paradoxically allowing the middle class wage earner to catch up with the net income of the minimum wage household instead of the other way around.
It is partly true that “the true minimum wage is zero” as economist Tom Sowell once stated if by this he meant that a minimum wage job might create two outsourced jobs in a zero sum game. Minimum wage has many aspects and many layers of meaning to different people depending on their social location.
But recipients of minimum wage in California apparently receive a $4,500 annual annuity for a family of four with one wager earner and two children. A $4,500 annual payment compounded at 5 percent over 30 years reflects about $10,000 per year. It is no wonder that Democratic politicians and unions argue for the minimum wage so strongly for it surely must buy votes for an effective net income premium of $4,500 per year.
This also refutes the half-truth that you “can’t support a family on a minimum wage.” It is true you can’t support a family on minimum wage alone, but if you know how to work the system you can realize more net income than white-collar workers with much more education and training. To the contrary, you can support a family on a minimum wage and you can afford luxuries like a new car and a flat screen TV. Contrary to socialist U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont the minimum wage together with its qualifying income supplement programs is most definitely not “a poverty wage.”
Where minimum wage jobs are given to undocumented persons who may not be able to qualify for the whole range of income assistance programs this would run counter to apparent social policy to wrap a “safety net” around minimum wage jobs. The whole package of minimum wage income supplement programs seems to follow a social policy that no full time working family shall be deprived of the means to at least appear to be in the middle class.
The above comparison intentionally does not take into consideration other welfare transfers such as a homeowner’s mortgage interest deduction because it only compared families in rental housing. Neither was a comparison made with two wage earner families, which would have also been apples and oranges. The above conclusions are tentative and are subject to modification based on better data and analysis or assumptions.
A provisional conclusion is that minimum wage in California is an annual winning lottery ticket not only into the middle class but a big leap-frog over the working class one earner family.
Links to sources consulted:
Making Ends Meet – How Much Does it Cost To Raise a Family in California?
Food Stamp Eligibility Standards
California Median Household Income
San Diego County Median Income
Apartment market rent – San Diego (upper tier)
Apartment market rent – San Diego (mid tier)Medical insurance cost quotes
6 comments
Write a commentRelated Articles
Firearm association accuses Fish and Game commissioner of conflict of interest
One of the most controversial bills passed this year by the California Legislature was Assembly Bill 711, by Assemblyman Anthony
Do Californians want to raise oil taxes?
Are Californians ready for another tax increase? That’s what California hedge-fund manager Tom Steyer sought to find out in his “People’s
State to foist inmates on counties
MAY 27, 2010 By LAURA SUCHESKI Although state legislators say that state-to-county unfunded mandates are illegal, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger wants
Well, subsidized school lunch isn’t cash that anyone can spend. Obviously the parents save the cost of the PB&J sandwich and apple, but counting it as income is a stretch.
Section 8 vouchers, meanwhile, have infamous waitlists, literally years.
And arbitrarily discounting transportation costs and miscellaneous expenses — and then counting the remainder as expendable income — is just strange. And you say you used CBP’s figures, but if so you must have miscalculated them.
8K a year in food stamps, though — even for a family of four, I am surprised it’s that high.
Well, subsidized school lunch isn’t cash that anyone can spend. Obviously the parents save the cost of the PB&J sandwich and apple, but counting it as income is a stretch.
============================
It is a compensated benefit. They also get free breakfests in many districts.
But overall I agree with your post, the notion that these welfare services are easy to get or maintain or are decent is just a myth.
And Section 8 housing, while subsidized, is usally awful. And as you pointed out-takes years to receive.
8K in foodstamps is $154/week, or about $38 per person per week, not steak dinners, but I could eat decent on that amount, although I usually spend double that.
I do not agree with the article-and I usually do agree with what is written on this site.
I was a teacher in LAUSD for 5 years.
The kids get free breakfast and free 2nd breakfast. I myself witnessed it. They can have breakfast before school starts and they serve it again at recess. The lunchroom doesn’t do meal counts unless the school has to use meal tickets. Next the kids would get free lunch. Then after school they get free snack in LA’s Best- the free after school program. The school I was at -the entire school qualified for ‘free breakfast program’.
After looking at my students records it was shocking how many of their parents were illegal. The legal child by birthright is entitled to housing, food stamps, medicaid, etc. That’s how they do it.
After 5 years of witnessing these continued abuses I moved away from Cali after living there my whole life.
Yes, including the additional programs does provide more than just minimum wage – exactly because $8/hr alone is insufficient.
I agree with the comments above about section 8 housing – usually awful and years of wait lists.
Assuming that a single wage earner family would spend $10.8K a year on child care is not at all realistic.
This is apalling! That anyone would encourage people to not support themselves and partake of the system as being more fortuitous than earning your own way is terrible. I hope someone shuts this website down. Happening upon it has dropped my opinion of the people in this great nation down a peg. Sad, very sad. I do not agree with but have to accept the masses of ilegal immigrants who abuse the system but to preach that it is the way to create more disposable income, shame, shame, shame on you.
Very interesting. I was surprised that the number of minimum wage recipients was only 75,000. Is that because most of those positions are now filled by non-reporting illegal immigrants? PS How come the utility bill in column two is bigger than in three and four?