Public Servants Lack Accountability

May 2, 2011

Union arguments in favor of their members’ lush pensions are falling by the wayside as the public examines the facts. For instance, union officials argue that the average public-sector pension benefit in California is “only” $30,000 a year, while neglecting to mention that the number, according to the state’s watchdog Little Hoover Commission, rises to $66,000 a year for recent retirees — a reflection of the widespread pension boosting of the past decade.

Virtually no one in the workaday private sector gets that level of guaranteed benefit, and the number of retired government employees grabbing $100,000 a year is growing by at least 40 percent a year. No wonder the public is angry. But the public is angry at more than the unsustainable pension debt and the unfair imbalance between the amounts received in the public vs. the private sector. People are getting angry at the abuses by public employees and at the lack of accountability even when miscreants are caught red-handed.

The Sacramento Bee reported recently on state employees who walk away at retirement with as much as $800,000 in unused leave — a clear violation of the rules. Now the newspaper is reporting that a “top NATO general who formerly led the California National Guard enhanced his salary during his state tenure by collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars in dual pay.” Maj. Gen. William Wade padded his pay by about $155,000 — “beyond the legal limits” as the Bee put it.

There are hasty legislative proposals to stop such greedy enrichments in the future, but there’s no apparent push to put Wade — since promoted to a top NATO position in Italy — where he belongs, in the hoosegow. Somehow, when government officials commit offenses we get euphemisms about conduct being beyond legal limits and improper behavior.

Try to find any effort to deal with massive disability fraud that goes on at police and fire stations, as majorities of public safety union members discover a back injury or knee injury just in time to protect half their retirement pay from taxes.

The Public Awake

Union officials such as the Orange County Employees Association’s Nick Berardino argue that the public is demonizing public employees. In reality, the public is waking up to the scams perpetrated on us for years. A statewide union official, Art Pulaski, claims that the public is simply envious of public employees. There’s some truth to that — and why not be envious when the people who are supposed to work for us live far better than most of us, courtesy of our tax dollars? – but what these union leaders miss is the brewing anger over the accountability issue.

The private sector doesn’t work perfectly. No human endeavor does. But in my lifetime there, I have never seen managers cover up for and defend miscreants. If you don’t produce enough to justify your salary, you are gone. If you commit crimes or do things “beyond the legal limits,” corporate managers are all too happy to turn the case over to the authorities. There is too much downside in keeping around lazy, misbehaving and lawbreaking employees. It can put you out of business or can prompt prosecutors to look for fraud and other crimes.

In government, officials typically circle the wagons. The unions stand up to protect the worst of the worst. The disciplinary rules are so cumbersome that it’s generally not worth trying to do anything about misbehavior. That’s why the public schools have “rubber rooms” — places where allegedly bad teachers wile away the years receiving full pay and benefits as their cases are adjudicated at a glacial pace. That’s why police officers accused of wrongdoing and misjudgment – even misjudgments that lead to unjustified killings and violations of individual rights — end up with months of paid leave (i.e., additional vacation time), before eventually being returned to the streets after a closed process that tilts heavily in the officers’ favor.

Accountability Rare

Notice how only a handful of sleeping air traffic controllers — union members who endangered lives by neglecting their responsibilities — received suspensions and other minor punishments. There’s rarely any accountability. The California Supreme Court ruled recently in a case involving two Orange County social workers who were found by a jury to have filed false reports and held back evidence so that they could unjustly take away a woman’s two children. This is almost hard to fathom, but I’ve reported on Child Protective Services and find it easy to believe in the context of my research. Social workers have immense power and few checks and balances, and some of these workers are on power trips — “Obey or we take your kids!”

In this case, the state’s highest court upheld a verdict of nearly $5 million plus millions more in legal fees and noted that this was no isolated incident. So what happens to these people who were admonished by the courts and who put a family through more than six years of living hell?

Marcie Vreeken and Helen Dwojak were not even disciplined. As the Register’s Kimberly Edds reported, Dwojak retired in 2006, and Vreeken was promoted. Get this — Vreeken now trains other social workers. Let’s hope it doesn’t include the class, “Creative methods in snatching people’s kids.”

Orange County officials actually argued that social workers should be afforded immunity, even for wrongdoing. I recall a bill that would have done the same thing for firefighters after a D.A. had the audacity to try to prosecute a firefighter for alleged misbehavior that killed someone.

Do we really want to provide powerful government agents with full immunity even when they break the law and misuse their power? Isn’t that situation the opposite of what our nation’s founders had in mind? It’s in totalitarian nations where officials are untouchable, and lowly citizens had better obey or else.

My prediction is that the public employee issue is not going away — not simply because the pension debts are depleting budgets, but because we are only scratching the surface of the accountability issue, which touches on the foundation of what we are as a society. It’s about time that we bring on this necessary debate.

— Steven Greenhut

 

 

No comments

Write a comment
  1. Bruce
    Bruce 2 May, 2011, 08:28

    “But in my lifetime there, I have never seen managers cover up for and defend miscreants.”

    You should have been paying closer attention.

    Reply this comment
  2. RObert
    RObert 2 May, 2011, 08:36

    These are the Days Of Of The Triffids! Oppression and evil by a few…got to change!

    Reply this comment
  3. Bruce
    Bruce 3 May, 2011, 09:48

    This article writes about ‘FACTS’. For every dollar paid in pension benefits,
    64 cents come from investment earnings, 15 cents come from member contributions
    (which has increased with the most recently approved union contracts), and 21 cents coming from employer contributions (which may decrease as member contributions increase.) These numbers reflect that pensions are a shared responsibility. CalPERS is nearly 70% funded which is considered adequate funding. I believe that journalists should be accountable for providing balanced
    information whenever they don’t suffer from pension envy.

    Reply this comment
  4. Tylerle13
    Tylerle13 3 May, 2011, 15:32

    Bruce, I recently heard an official speaking about the funding levels of all of the states pensions funds, the highest of which is New York, which if currently at 110%, and any states that are at 80% or below are in trouble. If California is, as you stated, at 70%, then they are 10% below the level that is considered dangerous. 10% below the reccomended minimum does not seem to be “Adequate funding” by any conventional standards.

    And the pensions that are currently being paid out pale in comparison to the pensions that are a result of the jackpot contracts that were given out by Gray Davis. Those will begin drawing on the pension fund over the next 10-20 years as those “public servants” reach the retirement age. They are going to be a big problem, especially if the employees get that standard “Promotion & Paybump” for their final year and if they happen to come down with that mysterious “Back Injury” that seems to be an epidemic among public employees in their final year or 2 on the job. Those statistics about “Current Payouts” are misleading because they do nothing to address the lack of funding for the spiked pensions that will be coming due within the next decade or so.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Give officials 100% pay cut

Nov. 26, 2012 By John Seiler The California Citizens Compensation Commission just cut our wonderful state officials’ pay by 5

Don't Dis The Public Safety Unions

I heard a very disturbing story today on a Sacramento radio news program, leaving me to wonder what happened to

WikiLeaks Good For Free Society

DEC. 5, 2010 The response by pundits to the latest WikiLeaks classified-document dump has reminded me of a preacher who